Bush to Consider Closing Guantanamo

By talkleft

ABC News reports that President Bush is holding talks about the future of Guantanamo and may decide to close it.

High-level discussions among top advisers have escalated in the past week, with the most senior administration officials in continuous talks about the future of the prison camp at Guantanamo Bay--and how it will be dramatically changed and/or closed in the wake of the Supreme Court's ruling that gave detainees there access to federal courts.

He may decide by Saturday when he leaves for the G8 summit. But it's unlikely he will issue an announcement that soon. As to the reason: the recent Supreme Court decision and those that preceded it.

High-level administration officials say the Court's decision dramatically changes the legal landscape--and raises questions about whether the government has solid evidence to present to federal judges to justify ongoing detentions.

Meaning, of course, evidence that would be admissible in a criminal proceeding as opposed to a military tribunal.

Comments

(33)

Why, what a strange ko-inkly-dink!

This wouldn't have anything to do with, oh I dunno, trying to increase the Senile Pants-shitter's shot at being "elected," would it?

You don't have to burn books to destroy a culture. Just get people to stop reading them.
---Ray Bradbury

Naaah, couldn't be THAT...

...or could it?

Things to make you go "hmmm......"

If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error. ~~~John Kenneth Galbraith

Good, now they can be imprisoned in their countries of

origin. Reminds me of the old saying: Be careful of what you wish for, you just may get it. No constitutional rights, torture, etc. Well, you guys may have gotten your wish, but do you think the detainee's really relish the idea of returning to Afganistan, syria, saudi arabia, etc? Oh well. Hey, didn't we just have a discussion about what Syria does to innocent people in their detention facilities? Hummmmmmmmmmmm And you people claim to have compassion.

Say it, Sissy Boy

PENIS

You can't, can you? Typical little closet gay republicunt.

You don't have to burn books to destroy a culture. Just get people to stop reading them.
---Ray Bradbury

You have a problem with sending them HOME?

Well, I suppose you should be worried...after all, Gitmo has been instrumental in increasing the number of terrorists in the Middle East ever since Cowboy-hat Oathbreaker decided to use it to hold his "detainees".

Way to go, RepubliCANTs. You're creating enemies of the US faster than you can kill them!

If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error. ~~~John Kenneth Galbraith

No it hasn't. Your making a statement.

Back it up with facts. Nano traitor man.

Look at the EVIDENCE.

Then go enlist, traitor.

If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error. ~~~John Kenneth Galbraith

What evidence?

Nano traitor man. You made the statement, now back it up, or admit your full of shit, and are just spouting propaganda to prop up your Islamo facist masters.

You can't be mastered by someone who doesn't exist

...and since "islamofascism" only exists in your deranged imagination, it proves that I'm thinking for myself and you're just aping your betters.

Now go enlist, traitor scum. Cowboy-hat Oathbreaker and his PNAC masters need your blood to help pull more oil out of the Iraq desert. Just ask them.

If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error. ~~~John Kenneth Galbraith

Google it. I did a quick

Google it. I did a quick google and here are just a few:

War on Terror May Breed More Terrorism, Experts Tell Madrid Summit...
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0309-13.htm

...And Americans Agree
http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/view/13008

Even a Government study concurs that "The War on Terror Is the Leading Cause of Terrorism"
http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/48620/

'nuff said!

-- McCain = Four more years of the same --

Did you even bother to read your own links

or did you post them thinking no one would? They prove nothing. The commondreams site only says it MAYBREED mor terrorism, the angus site is just an opinion of what some american's believe may be true, and the alterne study is not a government study but one done by mother jones magazine. Please, get real. You apparantly are a propogandist for the Islamo facist, or are just brainwashed by them.

The first 2

cite numerous expert opinions that agree with his statement. The third cites statistics that terrorism has increased since our occupation of Iraq began. If you don't like the source of the study, find a STUDY that shows that attacks are down. GOOD LUCK.

So, opinions are facts to you, is that it.

Look at your answer, numerous expert opinions. Who are these experts, and why are their opinions any more valid than mine, or yours? What makes them experts? Who considers them experts? What information do they rely on? Who do they work for? Who funds their studies?
Regarding the study, Terrorism, world wide is down, unless you include attacks within the iraq/afgani/Chechnya/pakastani sphere of conflict. Did your study include these "war zone" attacks as part of their stats? Or do you know? europe has seen a marked decrease in attacks, so has most other places in the world. You seem to just pull facts out that only support your position, regardless of methodology.

Maybe one source you should look at is the UN. Why don't you research and use as a source their findings? Or NATO's findings? Or the Heritage foundation's findings? Or the CATO instituter's findings? They are a lot more credible than Mother Jone's.

who the experts are

and their credentials are in the article.

Again, if you don't like the source, do your own homework and find a STUDY that refutes it.

Those were found in 10

Those were found in 10 seconds using "the google". I didn't cherry pick out of the pages and pages of results, I just took 3 decent ones from the first page.

So all these independent studies, polls, government reports (see the NIE), government studies, etc are all wrong. And *I* am the propagandist?

-- McCain = Four more years of the same --

gt6 and dtaylo I read yours now you read mine.

Condoleezza Rice Says She's `Proud' of Decision to Invade Iraq

By Janine Zacharia

July 3 (Bloomberg) -- Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said she's ``proud'' of the U.S. decision to wage the Iraq war and insisted that the world is not more dangerous than it was when George W. Bush took office.

``We're now beginning to see that perhaps it's not so popular to be a suicide bomber. We're beginning to see that perhaps people are questioning whether Osama Bin Laden ought to really be the face of Islam,'' Rice, 53, said in an interview to be broadcast this weekend on Bloomberg Television's ``Conversations with Judy Woodruff.''

``And I am proud of the decision of this administration to overthrow Saddam Hussein,'' said Rice, who was Bush's national security adviser at the time of the March 2003 invasion. As of yesterday, 4,107 U.S. soldiers died in Iraq and more than 30,000 were wounded. She said the Iraq war has been ``tougher than any of us really dreamed.''

Rice, who backs the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, Arizona Senator John McCain, said she ``thought it was great'' when the Democratic race came down to a woman and a black man. ``I didn't think it was surprising,'' she said.

People abroad are ``fascinated'' by Illinois Senator Barack Obama, the presumptive Democratic nominee, Rice added when asked what effect Obama's candidacy is having around the world.

``But I'll tell you something. Ultimately, whoever is elected president of the United States will represent the United States, not as a black president or as a woman president or as a black secretary of state or as a woman secretary of state, but the United States of America,'' Rice said.

North Korea

Rice, with only seven months left as secretary of state, has a wide diplomatic agenda, trying to make progress toward an Israeli-Palestinian peace agreement and a North Korean nuclear disarmament deal while trying to persuade Iran to accept incentives to abandon uranium enrichment, a process, once mastered, that could lead to a nuclear bomb.

While Rice was in Asia last week, North Korea submitted an inventory of nuclear plants and material to China, and the U.S. moved to remove North Korea from its list of state sponsors of terrorism. The Bush administration was hammered by conservative critics, including House Republican Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, who called the deal ``cause for profound concern.''

In the interview, Rice cited as progress that the North Koreans were ``putting themselves out of the business of making plutonium'' even as many U.S. sanctions remain in place.

``So with all due respect to those who look at this deal and say somehow North Korea has gotten a great deal, I think one can say that this is a really good step for non-proliferation,'' Rice added.

China

On China, Rice said the Chinese were being ``somewhat more helpful on Darfur.'' Demonstrations over China's support for the Sudanese leadership in Khartoum as it wages war with rebel groups in the Darfur region, as well as China's rule in Tibet and its treatment of the Dalai Lama, could overshadow the Olympic Games, which open in Beijing August 8.

Rice reiterated that Bush plans to attend the games, even as some human rights activists have urged him to boycott the event. ``The president has been very clear that the Olympics is a sporting event and he's going to go to it as a sporting event,'' Rice said. In Beijing earlier this week, she said she'd be keen to watch some Olympic basketball and track-and-field competitions.

Iran, Pakistan

Asked if she thought it would be a mistake for Israel to launch a pre-emptive strike against Iran over its nuclear program, Rice said the Israelis have been willing to work with the U.S. on a diplomatic solution.

``They, too, believe that it's possible to deal with this diplomatically. But we better have really robust diplomacy in order to deal with this threat because the Iranians are making progress,'' she said.

Rice said she believed Iran, which the administration has accused of funneling weapons to Shiite militias in Iraq, had ``vulnerabilities'' in Iraq that the U.S. could exploit. She did not specify what they were.

Rice defended the Bush administration's policies when asked about a June 30 New York Times report that al-Qaeda, since the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, has successfully shifted its base of operations from Afghanistan to Pakistan's tribal areas and has rebuilt much of its ability to attack.

Rice, acknowledging there are policy debates within the administration on how to confront al-Qaeda, said many of the terrorist group's leaders are ``either in custody or they're dead.''

`Certain Strengths'

``Yes, it has certain strengths and continues to have certain strengths in this area that is very difficult for anyone to govern and very difficult for anyone to operate in. But there have been successes there too,'' Rice said.

Rice, who has been suggested as a possible McCain running mate, has said repeatedly that she has no plans to seek elected office and will return to Stanford University in Palo Alto, California, where she was provost, after the end of the administration in January 2009.

She has said may write another book on foreign policy. And in the interview she noted: ``I have been very active in educational causes before, particularly for underprivileged kids. That's what I'll go back and do.''

To contact the reporter on this story: Janine Zacharia in Washington at jzacharia@bloomberg.net.

Last Updated: July 3, 2008 13:04 EDT

What did you expect

after she lied to get us in.

No she didn't.

All she did was play up the positive's and play'd down the negatives. It's called pushing your(the Presidents) agenda.

By leftysrsickJuly 3, 2008 - 8:03pm

Don't you mean"catapulting the propaganda"? It's also known as lying.

George W. & George H.W. Bush - Living proof that the dumbshit doesn't fall far from the dumbass.

we've been through this before Hatey

Her statement about the aluminum tubes was an unequivocal lie.

By leftysrsickJuly 3, 2008 - 7:20pm

Bwwwahahaha!

Good ol' Cunninglingus. She's always good for a laugh. It's too bad that she never knows what she's talking about.

George W. & George H.W. Bush - Living proof that the dumbshit doesn't fall far from the dumbass.

Is Georgie finally accepting responsibility for his actions?

Bush Tours America to Survey Damage Caused by His Disastrous Presidency

George W. & George H.W. Bush - Living proof that the dumbshit doesn't fall far from the dumbass.

BWAHAHAHAHA!

Gotta love The Onion!

BTW, if you've ever heard the term "to have a conniption," and want to know what it means, look at the trolls after reading THAT article :D

You don't have to burn books to destroy a culture. Just get people to stop reading them.
---Ray Bradbury

George W Bush

Building a stronger Al Qaeda for tomorrow...

I notice not one of you can provide

any basis for your absurd statements.
That's why I consider all of you propagandists.
You all are just puppets of your Islamo facists masters, and traitors to your country.

Hi, Pot. This is Kettle. You're black.

Go enlist, traitor scum. Make sure KBR and Halliburton can sustain their profit margins. And take your sock-puppets with you.

I don't tell jokes. I just watch the government and report the truth. ~~~Will Rogers

Here's how it works

When we make a statement that you think is not true, you say so and say what you believe to be true ( be specific)and we will document it. But be ready to do the same because if you don't, neither will we.

gt6

I have done that, many times. All I get from your side is insults. And just because you post something doesn't make it true. See my comments above to dtaylo, about his posted links.
And before we go any further, I will state right here and now, I do not think the Republican party is ever 100% correct, nor do I believe the Democractic party is 100% wrong. Nor do I think Bush is error free, but I don't believe he intends harm to this country or whats to destroy the constitution. He's just a man, doing a difficult job, in trying times.

I have yet to see you SPECIFICALLY point out a flaw

and you have NEVER backed up your statements with documentation.

\His intent is not harm, that is merely a consequence of his actions about which he does not care. What he cares about is profit for his corporate cronies at the expense of the average guy.

Give me an example.

When I make a statement of fact, you'll know where It came from.

By dumb ass July 3, 2008 - 5:33pm

When I make a statement of fact, you'll know where It came from.

I bet you miss your mom now!

Don't close Gitmo!

Evil doers like Bush and Cheney need to be sent there.

hatey always builds up to the big spam bomb

Any moment now. Then it's Bye Bye!

Comments

(33)