Thurgood Marshall Would Turn 100 Today
Via NPR, Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall, the court's first African American Justice, would have turned 100 today.
Check out this clip -- billed as a "lost interview" between Marshall and Mike Wallace. Though it's undated, Marshall talks about Adam Clayton Powell's controversial support of Republican president Dwight Eisenhower and the Democratic Party's failure to act on segregation in the South.
- Original article
- FILED UNDER: Guest Blogger
- July 2, 2008








I like the last line, about the democractic party.
The truth comes out. The (democratic) party of segregation and slavery.
- Email this page
By leftysrsickJuly 2, 2008 - 11:15pmThat was true then
but that wing of the party left it after Johnson pushed through his great society. They have since all become republicans. The dixiecrats became the base of the republican party.
- Email this page
By gt6July 2, 2008 - 11:35pmProof?
So, what happened to the pro civil rights base of the republican party? They sure as hell didn't become democrats.
- Email this page
By leftysrsickJuly 3, 2008 - 12:02amThe division was on geographic lines
not party. The North was for it, the south against. More northern Repubs voted no than northern Dems. When the Dixiecrats switched sides they became the base of the party and are most influencial even today. There was no pro-civil rights base per se, just that the north wwas less against it.
The original House version:
Southern Democrats: 7-87 (7%-93%)
Southern Republicans: 0-10 (0%-100%)
Northern Democrats: 145-9 (94%-6%)
Northern Republicans: 138-24 (85%-15%)
The Senate version:
Southern Democrats: 1-20 (5%-95%) (only Senator Ralph Yarborough of Texas voted in favor)
Southern Republicans: 0-1 (0%-100%) (this was Senator John Tower of Texas)
Northern Democrats: 45-1 (98%-2%) (only Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia opposed the measure)
Northern Republicans: 27-5 (84%-16%
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1964
- Email this page
By gt6July 3, 2008 - 8:49amThey where still democrats, and with out the
northern democrats pandering to the southern democrats, the party would have ceased to exists. Just like today and the parties pandering to the far left socialists. The democractic party only exists to grap power in any way it can. It will climb in bed with anyone, so long as they maintain power.
The republican party did not accept the racists, anti civil rights KKK part of the dixie crats. Remember, it was the republican party who historically fought for civil rights, and their base has always been those who did so. You can't twist things to say any differant. The democratic base has, by its own history, been the party of racism, trickery and deceit. Only in recent times, by adopting the republican platform of racial inclusion, have they moved beyond their racists past. And for you to try and say that because the democrat abandoned their racists platform, the republicans adopted it is just plain absurd. By the way, name the democratic programs that have actually benefited people of color. The civil rights act? No. That actually came from Eisenhower. The voting rights act? Wrong again. Another Republican program, stolen by LBJ.
The only thing the democractic party is good at is deception. That's why poor people tend to vote for them. Take from those who have, and pretend to give it to those who don't, while all the time, lining your pockets with power. Ted Kennedy is prime example of this duplicity.
- Email this page
By leftysrsickJuly 3, 2008 - 10:39amWant some cheese and crackers to go with that WHINE?
It's always fun watching a sheeple-troll's head implode when confronted with actual FACTS. Yours makes a really weird whistling noise!
Now go enlist, traitor scum.
If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error. ~~~John Kenneth Galbraith
- Email this page
By nonexistent manJuly 3, 2008 - 10:43amJeez, your brain cell must of leaked out of your ear...
with that amazing display of twisted logic.
Was David Duke a democrat?
- Email this page
By thaelmann37July 3, 2008 - 10:46amYa, he was for quite awhile.
and the re publican's rebuked him, soundly. Is that all you got, noman37? By the way, your party seems to hve accommodated the KKK for over a hundred years. What's up with that? You guys don't care who you get in bed with, so long as they can keep you in power.
- Email this page
By leftysrsickJuly 3, 2008 - 4:05pmBy leftysrsick July 3, 2008 - 4:05pm
Everyone say 'hello' to hatemoron;
Hi Again, Dummy!
- Email this page
By othelloJuly 3, 2008 - 7:47pmAn example of your rainbow lovin' civil rights republican
is our favorite bullshit artist bebe, who demonstrated his compassion for other races with the comment below.
- Email this page
By thaelmann37July 3, 2008 - 10:48amWho gives a damn what
Who gives a damn what Thurgood Marshall might think?
- Email this page
By bebeholmesJuly 3, 2008 - 10:22amOne HELL Of a Lot More People...
... than care what you think, race baiter.
- Email this page
By othelloJuly 3, 2008 - 10:28am