Lieberman is Out of Line

By Booman Tribune

by BooMan

The effort to turn Iran into the latest incarnation of Nazi Germany is deeply dishonest and depressing. For some people, anyone that makes Israel uncomfortable is a de facto
Nazi. Iran has not fought a war of territorial expansion in centuries.
I can't even think of an example in the last 500 years. What's more,
Israel is armed to the teeth with nuclear weapons. Iran has no nuclear
weapons. And, if they did have them, they'd be no more likely to
explode one in Israel than Pakistan is today. If Pakistan were to
attack Israel with nuclear weapons there would be no need for America
to 'obliterate' them because Israel would do the job first.

Iran has its faults. So did the Soviet Union. But the Soviet Union
never used its nuclear weapons. And, unlike the Soviet Union, Iran has
no territorial ambitions. Their support of Hezbollah is as much about
strengthening their Shi'a brethren in Lebanon's internecine political
fights as it is about harassing Israelis. And their alleged support of
Hamas is about having street cred as one of the few Islamic countries
willing to continue the fight post Camp David.

I don't expect Israelis to turn a passive eye to activities that
threaten and sometimes kill their citizens. Israelis are rightly
angered by both Iran's actions and their irresponsible rhetoric. But
Iran poses a low-level threat, not an existential one. The Iranians are
not suicidal.

Moreover, it pays to remember that even Nixon and Kissinger met
repeatedly with our communist adversaries in China, North Vietnam, and
the Soviet Union. They talked to the Soviet ambassador almost daily.
And that is really what this debate is about. Do we talk to our enemies
or do we just try to kill them?

When President Bush goes before the Knesset and compares Democrats to Nazi appeasers, he's crossing a line. And for Joe Lieberman to issue this statement is just appalling.

 

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Senator Joseph Lieberman (ID-CT)
issued the following statement in response to President Bush’s
statement to the Israel Knesset this morning:

“President Bush got it
exactly right today when he warned about the threat of Iran and its
terrorist proxies like Hamas and Hezbollah. It is imperative that we
reject the flawed and naïve thinking that denies or dismisses the words
of extremists and terrorists when they shout “Death to America” and
“Death to Israel,” and that holds that—if only we were to sit down and
negotiate with these killers—they would cease to threaten us. It is
critical to our national security that our commander-in-chief is able
to distinguish between America’s friends and America’s enemies, and not
confuse the two.”

What does Joe want to do? Kill all the Iranians? Kill all the Lebanese?
Kill all the Gazans? That kind of exterminationist thinking is a lot
closer to NaziThink than Joe would like to admit. But it's implicit in
his logic. And why does Joe Lieberman say that these groups threaten
'us'? Has Hezbollah attacked America, or attacked Americans in the last
twenty years? Has Hamas, ever?

You want to know what has made Israel safer than anything else in its
history? The peace treaties that Carter hammered out with Egypt and
Clinton hammered out with Jordan. That was accomplished by talking, not
fighting. Israel no longer faces any credible threat of land invasion,
and they have the last two Democratic presidents to thank for it.
Presidents Reagan and Bush encouraged two disastrous invasions of
Lebanon. That's the kind of terrible advice Israel has received from
Republican leaders that are supposed to be strong on terrorism. Prior
to the 1982 invasion of Lebanon, suicide bombing was almost unheard of
in the Islamic world, and Iran's influence was almost completely
contained within their own borders.

Comparing Iran to Nazi Germany is a grave insult to our intelligence. Even our Secretaries of Defense and State
recognize the necessity and advisability of engaging Iran. Is it any
wonder why the Democrats kicked Joe Lieberman out of the party? I don't
know what it would take to convince him that his policies make Israel
less secure. History is so stark and decisive on the matter, that I
suppose Lieberman just doesn't read it.

Comments

(111)

LIeberman doesn't work for US interests

He works for the interests of the far right in Israel. Even moderate Israelis don't agree with him.

Loserman will go republican soon

And probably accept Jay-zuz as well. It's the republickin' thing to do.

You don't have to burn books to destroy a culture. Just get people to stop reading them.
---Ray Bradbury

Joe it the man!

This in neat coming from the guy you people put as #2 on the Dem ticket by ALGore. Probably one of the few things ALGore got right. Oh and Joe STOMPED Ned Lamont in liberal CT....

"My presidency will be al Qaeda's worst nightmare." -John McCain Sep 4, 2007

Before you go praising Lieberman for stomping Lamont

You may want to remember who got Lieberman elected. Was it dems? Ummmmm....no. He was supported by the repub party, who had refused to give any real support to their own candidate. The majority of the votes for Lieberman came from repubs.

Lieberman is a moron of the highest order, and after November, he will probably switch to the repub side to finish his career, which will no doubt end in 2012. He has such impecable timing, picking a time when the repub president he supports has record disapproval ratings, and is even being shunned by his own party. He wants to support a party that not only is a minority party in the House and Senate right now, but has lost all 3 seats in traditionally repub districts in special elections in the past couple of month, which is a sign they will become an even smaller minority after November. It's like he decided to jump on the bandwagon of a team that is down 3 games to nothing in a 7 game playoff, and is losing badly with 5 seconds to go in the game. I guess Hillary isn't the only one with terrible judgement.

And I am also glad the commentator in the thread pointed out what I have been pointing out for quite a while. Why threaten to nuke Iran, when Israel could do the job so much faster than we could ever hope to do? Would we really need to send some nukes to kick up the radioactive debris and incinerated bodies left by an Israeli counterstrike? Or is it just that someone feels they need to prove they've got big balls by telling everyone how "tough" they are. To me, it sounds like Michael Jackson singing "I'm bad, I'm bad, you know it". Saying it, (or singing it) doesn't make it true. It just makes you sound shrill and desperate.

By UffdaguyMay 15, 2008 - 2:36pm

Why threaten to nuke Iran, when Israel could do the job so much faster than we could ever hope to do?

-Who ever said nuke Iran. I think using nukes is in NO WAY a good idea. We can use conventional weapons to wipe out their nuclear facilites just like the Israel did to Syria and Iraq.

Now, you ask why should we do it when Israel could do it just as well? My answer is because if WE do it Iran has no reason to hit Israel and because Iran has no business with the means to create a nuclear weapon.

"My presidency will be al Qaeda's worst nightmare." -John McCain Sep 4, 2007

Iran has no means to create

Nuclear weapons, you deranged ditto head. Your hatred of America is appalling. I hope people like you are soon rounded up and sent to re education camps. Your continual lack of respect for the laws of this country can no longer be tolerated. You have shown that you are not capable of understanding world events and you represent a terrible danger to the American people. You will never get your wish to murder the citizens of Iran.

By hufflarry2000May 15, 2008 - 3:55pm

Really? Check this out...

http:// news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4617398.stm

ISFAHAN - Uranium conversion plant
Iran is building a plant at a nuclear research facility to convert uranium ore into three forms:

Hexafluoride gas - used in gas centrifuges
Uranium oxide - used to fuel reactors, albeit not the type Iran is constructing
Metal - often used in the cores of nuclear bombs. The IAEA is concerned about the metal's use, as Iran's reactors do not require it as fuel.

NATANZ - Uranium enrichment plant
Iran resumed uranium enrichment work at Natanz in July 2004, after a halt during negotiations with leading European powers over its programme.

It announced in September 2007 that it had installed 3,000 centrifuges, the machines that do the enrichment.

This is the facility at the heart of Iran's dispute with the United Nations Security Council.

The Council is concerned because the technology used for producing fuel for nuclear power can be used to enrich the uranium to a much higher level to produce a nuclear explosion.

ARAK - Heavy water plant
The existence of a heavy water facility near the town of Arak first emerged with the publication of satellite images by the US-based Institute for Science and International Security in December 2002.

Heavy water is used to moderate the nuclear fission chain reaction either in a certain type of reactor - albeit not the type that Iran is currently building - or produce plutonium for use in a nuclear bomb.

But that's ok Chamberlin keep your head in the sand and appease Imademonjihad....GWB will take care of it for you...WAITAMINUTE...Wasn't it HILLARY the voted FOR war against Saddam AND VOTED FOR the Kyl-Lieberman amendment!

"My presidency will be al Qaeda's worst nightmare." -John McCain Sep 4, 2007

Iran has so far

succeeded in enriching Uranium to 3% purity, which is fine for power generation. For bomb you need better than 90%. They are not even close to that capability.

Like I said Iran has no nukes

and will not for many years if ever. You will not get your mass murder. The American people will not let your kind attack another country over lies. Hillary never voted for war, neither did anyone else. The kyl-lieberman amendment means nothing. It is people like you that have left this country in such a sad state of affairs. You are guilty of nothing less than treason and soon you will pay for your crimes against my country.

Don't look now, but other nations have much the same capability

or could have even faster than Iran. Brazil, Japan, South Korea, to name a few. Should we nuke them too, or just make them part of the Axis of Evil? Maybe just get UN sanctions against them, and send some carriers to cruise off their coasts to threaten them.

Do

any of them have oil? No? Then never mind.

By UffdaguyMay 15, 2008 - 4:42pm

Once they become state sponsors of terrorism....Yep. Do you deny that Iran is a state sponsor of terrorism? And how can you put Iran on the same level as Japan, S. Korea and Brazil. Completely different ideologies...Can you deny that?

"My presidency will be al Qaeda's worst nightmare." -John McCain Sep 4, 2007

when do we invade

Saudi then?

Bush is a sponsor of terrorism

or is lying to start a war not considered terrorism? But that is YOUR kind of terrorism so it is OK to murder innocent people that never did anything to us. You perverted, souless, unamerican mother fucker. Now provide proof that Iran sponsors terror.

Did you know that the US is and has been a state sponsor of

terrorism? For example, it is reported that 6 weeks ago, Bush signed an order for a program initially funded for $300 million that will fund groups that our own government has labelled as terrorist organizations to run terrorist operations in Iran. It also funds lovely things such as targeted assasinations. Now this is a tough one, so listen carefully. If a foreign government initiated programs to fund terrorist attacks and targeted assasinations in your country, what would you call it? Perhaps a declaration of war? Or is it OK because it is righteous America doing it to evil Iran? Would you be pissed off if Iran did the same thing to us? How about if North Korea did that?

We act so morally superior to the rest of the world, but we can't seem to get enough of displaying our hypocrisy to them at every opportunity.

By UffdaguyMay 16, 2008 - 9:20am

To put it simply...Yes. We in the west ARE superior to the hard line Islamic governemnts of the Middle East. This includes Saudi.

Am I ok with us funding organizations that would overthrow the Iranian govt and the Ayolatohls (sp?)...YEP.

Am I ok with targeted assassinations so that military action isn't needed...YEP.

Could Iran view this as an act of war? Sure if they want to. Do they have the "right" to declare war on us for it...Sure...Let em.....

"My presidency will be al Qaeda's worst nightmare." -John McCain Sep 4, 2007

By Fight4itMay 16, 2008 - 10:39am

You are a terrorist and a murderer. That sums you up in a nut shell.

You condone actions that cause large numbers of innocent casualties and you dismiss it with a heartless comment about it being a time of war. And why do you do this? Because you are a coward. you look at your family and you think the deaths of these people in other countries is acceptable to keep them safe. Not only is the source of your fear unjustified but so is your dismissive attitude of the pain you are causing.

I don't suppose you have taken the time to read the words of parents who have lost children as a consequence of the terrorism the US is responsible for in the middle east. You probably don't care. But they are parents and their children are suffering. And your silly fear is to blame for their pain. Yes your are to blame for their pain. You and every fearful US citizen that believes might is right.

If you asked your children if they would like you to kill several other children to keep them safe I'm sure they would say know. But eventually you will ween the off of their natural morality and they will be murderers like yourself.

By f u bush2May 16, 2008 - 10:48am

Well, you know. If the governments of these wonderful Islamic countries didn't support the tactics known as terrorism (you know, suicide bombing, killing children, blowing up schools and wanting to kill, enslave or convert all non-Muslims) then there would be no need for shooting wars and we could all have fun in trade wars (much less blood shed)....

Now just explain that to those in the middle-east. Egypt is Islamic and guess what, they don't support terrorism....

"My presidency will be al Qaeda's worst nightmare." -John McCain Sep 4, 2007

By Fight4itMay 16, 2008 - 11:32am

Do me a favor murderer. Show your children this picture. Tell them you did this for them.

You are a terrorist.

By Fight4it May 16, 2008 - 10:39am

There's a name for folks who think one group is superior to another. I'll let you work it out, bigot.
____________________
The "Dream Ticket" is a Death Trap!
Obama / Sebelius '08

By SJerseyIndyMay 16, 2008 - 11:35am

bigot

Main Entry: big·ot
Pronunciation: \ˈbi-gət\
Function: noun
Etymology: French, hypocrite, bigot
Date: 1660
: a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance

Nope, wrong again...

(I don't hate Arabs or Persians) I do think that Western Culture is patently superior to Middle Eastern culture....That makes me:

ethnocentric

Main Entry: eth·no·cen·tric
Pronunciation: \ˌeth-nō-ˈsen-trik\
Function: adjective
Date: 1900
: characterized by or based on the attitude that one's own group is superior

Get your sad attempt at an insult correct next time...

"My presidency will be al Qaeda's worst nightmare." -John McCain Sep 4, 2007

By Fight4itMay 16, 2008 - 12:17pm

You're both wrong. The best label for you is terrorist.

By f u bush2May 16, 2008 - 12:19pm

Sigh...Sad remark from a sad little mind.... Next...

"My presidency will be al Qaeda's worst nightmare." -John McCain Sep 4, 2007

By Fight4itMay 16, 2008 - 12:42pm

Your children are the spawn of a terrorist. Tell them you want to drop nukes on Iran to save them.

You murdering scum.

By Fight4it May 16, 2008 - 12:17pm

I didn't say the name was "bigot", bigot. It just so happens that you fall into multiple categories of those who discriminate against others...
____________________
The "Dream Ticket" is a Death Trap!
Obama / Sebelius '08

Wrong again....

Look at the definition..

Main Entry: big·ot
Pronunciation: \ˈbi-gət\
Function: noun
Etymology: French, hypocrite, bigot
Date: 1660
: a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance

Look at the examples and think back to that SAT or GRE...Now read with comprehension...
"Racial or Ethnic".... Now, think back...
A person can NOT change their Race and Ethnicity. A Caucasian will always be a Caucasian but a person CHOOSES to be a Christian, Muslim, Wiccan or whatever....

So:
Caucasian is to race what ethnicity is to Arab - True statement

Caucasian is to race what ethnicity is to Muslim - False statement

If I were to say I hate Arabs or I hate Persians or I hate Caucasians then I am by definition a bigot. If I say I hate Islam and it's teachings or I hate terrorists or Klansman, then I hate a group who have decided on a way of life... I don't hate Arabs and I don't hate Persians. Hell I don't even hate Muslims. I do think that the teachings of Islam are patently evil just as the teachings of the Klan are evil.....

Class dismissed. But you just go ahead and make yourself look ignorant....

"My presidency will be al Qaeda's worst nightmare." -John McCain Sep 4, 2007

re: By Fight4it May 16, 2008 - 2:08pm

Ifg you had any reading comprehension at all, it said "members of a group", and only provided racial or ethnic as an example.

It doesn't make you any less of a bigot. Muslims are as much of a group as Caucasians or Arabs.

♪ ♫ ♪ ♫ ♪

"Three great forces rule the world: stupidity, fear and greed." -- Albert Einstein

Most bigots

do not recognize their hatred for what it is. They find ways to rationalize and redefine it.

By gt6May 16, 2008 - 2:41pm

So, is it irrational to hate what the Klan represents? Are you in fact a bigot because you dislike/hate Klansmen and Nazis? If that is the case and I am in fact a bigot as I dislike the Klan and Nazis....

"My presidency will be al Qaeda's worst nightmare." -John McCain Sep 4, 2007

By Fight4itMay 16, 2008 - 2:44pm

You are a fascist but you don't know it. Just like the population of Germany didn't realize they were part of the problem, so you and your fellow Bush supporters have become.

It doesn't matter if you hate the Nazi's if you are one. And your ignorance of that fact is no excuse.

You are like the right wing pundit Mathews put down in that interview. You have no concept of history and no sense of introspection, no self awareness.

I hate what the Klan represents

But I don't lump all southerners together because of it or talk about obliterating Birmingham or Montgomery.

By Fight4itMay 16, 2008 - 2:08pm

bigot
Noun
a person who is intolerant, esp. regarding religion, politics, or race [Old French]

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/bigot

By frazzledMay 16, 2008 - 3:10pm

OK fair enough...I'll take it because I realize that Islam is evil. So named....

"My presidency will be al Qaeda's worst nightmare." -John McCain Sep 4, 2007

By Uffdaguy May 16, 2008 - 9:20am

American hypocrisy? Nah. No way.

I mean, it's not like we've said to Iran that they cannot have a civil nuclear energy program while our President is assisting with a nuclear program in a country where children are indoctrinated with hatred and a number of hijackers supposedly came from to fly airplanes into our buildings...

As Bush flew into Riyadh, the White House said the United States, the world's largest energy consumer, had agreed to help protect the resources of the world's top oil exporter and help it in developing peaceful nuclear energy.

____________________
The "Dream Ticket" is a Death Trap!
Obama / Sebelius '08

Now, now, remember, our resident genius illuminottie

said that it isn't about who has the bomb.....oh, wait, she DID say it was about who has the bomb, even though that's not what she said. I get confused, as she flip-flops more than Pander McFlipflop.

I guess it's ok for the Saudis to have nuclear power because they are family friends of the Bush family. See, if Ahmedinajad had just flown over to Crawford and cleared brush on the ranch for a couple of days, it would be just fine and dandy for him to have nuclear power too. Hey, Kim Jong Il, Bushie needs some landscaping done on the ranch. Hurry on over and you too can be a beloved nuke-possessing friend of the US! LOL

Uh, yeah Uff brain....

Brazil, Japan, and South Korea are all rogue states led by insane people. Damn you people are stupid. It isn't who has the bomb. Hell France has the bomb, are we worried about them using it? Nope. So do we care they have it? Nope. So glad folks like you have no power and never will.

When you men get home and face an anti-war protestor, look him in the eyes and shake his hand. Then, wink at his girlfriend because she knows she’s dating a pussy… ~ Attributed to General Tommy Franks

ummm...America is led by an insane person

who is the worlds BIGGEST terrorist. But that is your kind of terrorism so it is OK, right? Lying to start a war is fine as long as your masters do it, right. I hope they send your worthless ass over there and you get your tits blown off, you traitorous bitch.

re: By IlluminatiHottie May 15, 2008 - 5:22pm

And exactly how many countries has Iran attacked?

Hint: Less than the US.

What a fucking brain-washed Republibot! Your fearful leader tells you to cower in fear, and you blindly bend over and kiss his deranged ass!

♪ ♫ ♪ ♫ ♪

"Three great forces rule the world: stupidity, fear and greed." -- Albert Einstein

By GazmikMay 15, 2008 - 5:31pm

snottie is catholic you see.

Rush told her Iran was a nation overflowing with priests you see. She is very afraid.

Ummmm... Ever hear of Lebanon?

When you men get home and face an anti-war protestor, look him in the eyes and shake his hand. Then, wink at his girlfriend because she knows she’s dating a pussy… ~ Attributed to General Tommy Franks

By IlluminatiHottieMay 15, 2008 - 8:14pm

snottie

how many iraqi children's eyes had to glaze over in death to make you unafraid of the Saudi hijackers?

You dumb bitch.

Here is your just reward. Your republicans will get what they want. Deregulation and a weakened EPA. May the children of your family succumb to leukemia brought on by ingestion of carcinogens. Watch your children's eyes as they sicken and die. May god take your children in revenge you fucking murderer.

snottie is a supporter of terrorists

Her children and nieces and nephews deserve death.

By IlluminatiHottieMay 15, 2008 - 8:14pm

snottie

I hope the republicans stay in power. They will destroy the economy of this country and the world. As society breaks down the laws will too. And anything goes.

Laugh now while you can bitch. You are a murderer and a terrorist.

The misinformed one thinks

The misinformed one thinks that Iran attacked Lebanon. It was Israel that did.

Well, I'd call you illuminottie brain, but I know you don't have

one. What do you mean "It isn't who has the bomb"????? You yourself just said that this is PRECISELY the point. You say it is ok for France to have the bomb, for Brazil, Japan, and South Korea to have the bomb, but NOT for Iran. IN OTHER WORDS, YOU ARE SAYING THAT IT IS ALL ABOUT WHO HAS THE BOMB. To quote some retard on this thread (YOU), "Damn, you people are stupid". Do everyone a favor and go demonstrate your complete lack of brain cells somewhere else.

Who said nuke Iran.......ummmm.....Hillary?

Ummmmm....Bush? Hillary said that if Iran attacked Israel, they would be obliterated, would face mass retaliation. We both know exactly what that means. It isn't a few stray cruise missiles taking out an aspirin factory. That's nuclear weapons, pure and simple. And the Bush administration said long ago that some of those nuclear facilities can only be taken out with nukes, so yes, some people say we need to use nukes.

Use conventional weapons like Israel did to Syria and Iraq? Two points:

1. There is absolutely zero proof that the facility attacked in Syria was a nuclear plant. In fact, given the track record of this administration for fabricating intelligence data, such as WMD and biological warfare trailers and Iraqi drones, I wouldn't believe a thing they are saying on this. If you look at the images, they look like they were Photoshopped, and it was a pretty sloppy job too. In addition, if you look at the Israeli reaction (or non-reaction) to this whole affair, one thing you can comfortably conclude is that they did NOT hit a nuclear site, and they know it. When have they ever been this shy about talking about their attacks, especially when it comes to nukes? They were positively crowing about the Entebbe raid, and the raid on Osirak. They have been very vocal about Iran's supposed nuclear threat. The fact that they have been extremely quiet about what they did in Syria, not even saying a peep when the US presented its "proof" about the Syrian facility tells me that they know they didn't hit anything that posed a threat.

2. The attack on Osirak was on a not-quite-finished, unfueled nuclear reactor. That is vastly different from what you are proposing. The Iranian facility is fueled, and the centrifuges are loaded with uranium. Hitting those facilities will make Chernobyl look like a day in the park. The Union of Concerned Scientists estimates that 3 million people would die in 3 weeks due to radioactive contamination if just the reactor was hit. Add in the centrifuges, and the number grows. And that will permanently contaminate the Iranian oilfields, cutting world usable oil reserves by about half. And must we mention that the fallout will travel for thousands of miles, into places like Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, China, Korea, Japan, and beyond? Is it worth the deaths of millions and millions of people, the permanent loss of a significant percentage of the world's oil supply, the destruction of hundreds of thousands of square miles of agricultural land and the permanent contamination of cities such as Tokyo, New Delhi, Seoul, Mumbai and others just to prove to the world that you have balls of titanium? Not only will the rest of the world not thank us for this great service to mankind, they will hate us with unrestrained passion, and rightfully so. They would be fully justified in treating us as a pariah nation at best, and as an enemy to all mankind at the worst.

Finally, why should we attack Iran instead of Israel? Because if we do it Iran has no reason to hit Israel? That is so ridiculous I can't believe you said it. Do you have any idea how the muslim world sees us? We and Israel are seen as one and the same, joined at the hip, a notion that is only furthered by Hillary's remarks on mass retaliation, or Lieberman's idiotic comments, or Bush's foolish remarks. If we attacked Iran, muslims around the world would see it as simply something done for Israel by their friends, the US. After all, Bush says Israel is our oldest and best ally. Bet the Brits loved hearing that. Way to insult the nation that truly is our oldest and best ally.

Since you advocate mass murder

on this blog, so will I. I hope your whole family is wiped out and you end up horribly disfigured and crippled in a wheel chair. You deserve to know how the people you want to destroy feel. You have no morals, values or conscience. Some day soon, enemy combatants like you will be taken out of this society for good.

It's a real shame that some

It's a real shame that some people who advocate themselves as pro-life have such disdain for diplomacy in everything else. For them bloodshed and more bloodshed is the solution to anything. Like you suggested in your blog history offer us another view of things that war never has solved anything. In the other end talks has made the world a much better place. North Korea in recent memory is a good example of that. I can't wait for Obama to be elected so the world can go back on the pursuit of peace and not false bravado that line the pocket of a few rich people.

Joe is the man!

This in neat coming from the guy you people put as #2 on the Dem ticket with ALGore. Probably one of the few things ALGore got right. Oh and Joe STOMPED Ned Lamont in liberal CT....

"My presidency will be al Qaeda's worst nightmare." -John McCain Sep 4, 2007

Not to mention...

He's a shoo-in for 2012! Oh, and that trick with the burning bush...very classy. Can't wait until he comes down from the Mountain to give us the law!

You don't have to burn books to destroy a culture. Just get people to stop reading them.
---Ray Bradbury

By Fight4it May 15, 2008 - 2:19pm

Trust me: posting it twice doesn't make it any less retarded.
____________________
The "Dream Ticket" is a Death Trap!
Obama / Sebelius '08

Oh look, he puts "Al Gore"

Oh look, he puts "Al Gore" all together as one word... Wonder where he got that idea from (Rush)?

Nobody knew what an ass Joe was when Gore picked him.

-- McCain = Four more years of the same --

Lie berman

" Is it any wonder why the Democrats kicked Joe Lieberman out of the party?"

Regrettably, they didn't.

He *still* has his committee chairmanship (Homeland Security, of all things) and all his cushy perks. He sits in the Democratic Conference/Caucus and is party to the strategy sessions.

He is actually pondering the possibility of his speaking at the Repug convention in nomination of his bosom buddy Mc Cain.

He has no loyalty to anyone but himself. He is a stain on our federal government.

By imGillianMay 15, 2008 - 2:33pm

Zell Miller paved his way, but at least Zell waited until he was out of office to shoot his elephant dung spitballs.

Support the Troops
End the Occupation

Where's Our Beloved Hillary?

It's worth noting that, despite the uproar of numerous leading Dems, Hillary has remained oddly silent.
I noticed she took the time today to send out a press release about how she's "ahead in the popular vote".

When will we hear her denouncement of these remarks?

I suppose I'll just assume she agrees with the President, Senator McCain, and Joe Lieberman?

After all, she has hurled some of the same criticism at Barack for daring to mention he would meet with leaders of "hostile" nations (one that Hillary went so far as to vote in favor of labeling their military a "terrorist organization"), while at the same time has suggested that she would take the Bush-McCain-Lieberman approach and "totally obliterate" said nations...
____________________
The "Dream Ticket" is a Death Trap!
Obama / Sebelius '08

You wait for Hillary

I will wait for Obama. Will Obama vote to fund the war again? How about his comments on Pakistan?

By hufflarry2000 May 15, 2008 - 2:48pm

Who do you think Obama should name as his veep, seeing as to how the Democratic Party has turned the page on The Clintons?
____________________
The "Dream Ticket" is a Death Trap!
Obama / Sebelius '08

IF he gets the nomination

it had better be someone from PA, OH or FL if he even hopes to have a chance.

re: By hufflarry2000 May 15, 2008 - 3:08pm

News flash! The universe doesn't revolve around Ohio!

♪ ♫ ♪ ♫ ♪

"Three great forces rule the world: stupidity, fear and greed." -- Albert Einstein

Tell that to John Kerry

and the rest of the American people who have suffered thru Bush.

re: By hufflarry2000 May 15, 2008 - 3:22pm

There are fifty states in America, and Ohio is only one of them. No more important than any of the others.

♪ ♫ ♪ ♫ ♪

"Three great forces rule the world: stupidity, fear and greed." -- Albert Einstein

Maybe Jerry Springer would be the best choice for

a VP that could bring in the OH vote!!

re: By SJerseyIndy May 15, 2008 - 2:45pm

She wouldn't want to alienate Joe. Clinton/Lieberman 2008!

♪ ♫ ♪ ♫ ♪

"Three great forces rule the world: stupidity, fear and greed." -- Albert Einstein

With Zell Miller as Minister of Propaganda!

Seig heil.....I mean, hail to the Chief!

Tired of Being Polite.

I've always defended Israel and defended American Jews from anti-semitism... But I am an American FIRST and my first concern is America.

JOE LEIBERMAN IS NOTHING BUT AN ISRAELI MOLE WHOSE ONLY POLITICAL CONCERN IS WHAT'S BEST FOR ISRAEL.

Old timers here know how vehimently I've always defended Israel and defended American Jews from anti-semitism, so you know I don't say this lightly... BUT I'M TIRED OF BEING POLITE TO JOE LEIBERMAN AND MAKING BELIEVE HE REPRESENTS ANYONE BUT ISRAEL.

CHRIST!

I saw the other threads had died down and I thought that finally the Clinton cult was put to bed. But here they are.

I guess they are excited about Hillary's new strategy of getting super delegates to endorse Obama and the steel workers union too. She is so clever.

ITS OVER

Go to bed Hillary clan. At least you still have her poster on the wall.

Iran is not a threat

Only ditto heads that drink the Rush poison think so.

The US sponsors more terrorism than Iran could dream of.

And we enslave people around the world to make our clothes.

Wow FU, I never realized there were so many "ditto heads" in

France, Britan, Germany.... oh, and the UN. You know the UN, the international body which currently is imposing sanctions against Iran because they think Iran is a threat? So, Rush runs the world? And fool, we don't enslave anybody nor, do we sponsor terrorism. What color is the sky in your hate filled little world?
It's 4:20. I know what you're doing.

When you men get home and face an anti-war protestor, look him in the eyes and shake his hand. Then, wink at his girlfriend because she knows she’s dating a pussy… ~ Attributed to General Tommy Franks

By IlluminatiHottieMay 15, 2008 - 5:33pm

Your fascist leaders will get their justice in time. Should we hold you accountable too?

Awwww. Is FU the Nazi going to round us all up?

Dude, you're a pussy......Quit pretending you're capable of force.

When you men get home and face an anti-war protestor, look him in the eyes and shake his hand. Then, wink at his girlfriend because she knows she’s dating a pussy… ~ Attributed to General Tommy Franks

re: By IlluminatiHottie May 15, 2008 - 5:33pm

You know the UN, the international body which currently is imposing sanctions against Iran because they think Iran is a threat?

Exactly which sanctions is the UN imposing on Iran because they are a threat? They are monitoring Iran's nuclear program, but the head of the IAEA even stated that they weren't a threat.

But, you proudly wave your made-in-China flag and regurgitate the bullshit that is shoved down your throat, don't you?

♪ ♫ ♪ ♫ ♪

"Three great forces rule the world: stupidity, fear and greed." -- Albert Einstein

And Gazmik PROVES his remarkable stupidity....

Read much? Oh, and by Iran's own admission, they have not ceased enriching uranium.

http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2006/sc8928.doc.htm

It's from the UN's own website. Good enough source for ya, dumbass.

When you men get home and face an anti-war protestor, look him in the eyes and shake his hand. Then, wink at his girlfriend because she knows she’s dating a pussy… ~ Attributed to General Tommy Franks

From 2006?

And gosh, I hear this thing called Gopher was just invented to help you find text on that newfangled internets!

You don't have to burn books to destroy a culture. Just get people to stop reading them.
---Ray Bradbury

and how "rich" is this uranium?

Is it 90% like they would need to make bombs? No, it is 3% you ignorant unamerican witch. Watch out snottie! People like you are hated in my country now. The good times are over for your kind you fucking piece of human garbage. You will no longer harm my country.

re: By IlluminatiHottie May 15, 2008 - 8:10pm

Where in there is there anything about any imminent threat? Of course, you chickenshit motherfuckers have to live in constant fear, don't you? Your handlers tell you to be afraid of gays. Your handlers tell you to fear immigrants. Your leaders tell you to live in constant dread of Saddam. With him gone, that had to come up with another fear to contr