Fast Route to Plug in Hybrids?
visit EnergySmart for more great energy and environmental stories
(Prius) and Chevy (Volt) seem to be in a
race as to who
will provide the first mass-produced plug-in-hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) onto the market. The backfitmarket is building, with options coming to market for plug-in
conversions for existing hybrids. But what about the 10s of millions of
normal, internal combustion engines out there? Is there any hope for them? If Poulsen Hydrid is to be
believed, the answer is a resounding YES.The Poulsen Hybrid Power Assist System
“creats a PHEV by retro-fitting electric motors, DC motor controllers, storage
batteries and an on-board charger to a conventional new or used automobile.” The
electric system would be used for maintaining speed, after acceleration.
The development is based on the observation that only 10-15 horsepower is
required to propel a compact or mid-size automobile along a level road at a
steady 60-70 mph. leading to the conclusion that this relatively small amount of
electric power would be able to cope with 70-85% of normal driving, only aided
by the combustion engine during start up and when extra energy is required for
acceleration and hill climbing.
The systems puts hybrid electric motors on the outside of the rear wheels
with an onboard charger.
The system is expected to debut on the market next month. $3300 for purchase
and $600 for “professional installation”.
Honestly, mark me intrigued but questioning. For example,
the cost of gasoline for electricity. At $4000, a break even point comes well
after saving 1000 gallons of gasoline. Thus, how much gasoline is really saved
as this system basically moves the ICE to idling while the electricity handles
acceleration.
meaningful amount? Don’t know.
adding these systems outside the car?
Some questions and reasons for wondering, but still pretty intrigued with
this ingenious approach to tackling the challenges of the huge existing fleet of
internal combustion engine vehicles and moving miles from gasoline to
electricity.
- Widespread adoption of
PHEVs can reduce GHG emissions from vehicles by more than 450 million metric
tons annually in 2050 – equivalent to removing 82.5 million passenger cars from
the road. - There is an abundant supply
of electricity for transportation; a 60% U.S. market share for PHEVs would use 7
percent to 8 percent of grid-supplied electricity in 2050. - PHEVs can improve nationwide air quality and reduce
petroleum consumption by 3 million to 4 million barrels per day in 2050.But do we have 43 years to do this?
Why not start
with today’s automobiles?
Hat tip to AutoBlogGreen.
- FILED UNDER: All Things Green, Environment
- May 16, 2008








Next thing we'll be seeing....
$1.50 per hr. plug in stations....curtousy of Exxon/Mobile.
- Email this page
By roadgoddessMay 16, 2008 - 11:07amPlug ins
Look for them at the Mall. Sounds like a hit to me.
- Email this page
By gt6May 16, 2008 - 12:16pmBy gt6 May 16, 2008 - 12:16pm
...Especially if it only takes an hour! :D
- Email this page
By roadgoddessMay 16, 2008 - 12:48pmHope it doesn't go the way of the EV1
Hope it doesn't go the way of the EV1.
Can some one drive a truck load of Pepto Bismal over to the 'Republican Conference on Energy'?
They need to talk about SOLAR ENERGY without getting upset.
- Email this page
By FACTMEMay 16, 2008 - 12:06pmBut...
What if you have to drive more than 100 feet? Won't the extension cord pull out?
Oh, I get it...The charging stations will be only 100 feet or so apart...then it will be a simple job of hopping out and reattaching a new plug, getting back in, driving another 100 feet. I feel so warm and fuzzy inside about this brave, new radical move to save Gaia from Big Oil.
- Email this page
By voltarMay 16, 2008 - 1:00pmA plug in Hybrid
can get around 50 miles on the charge, after that it is like a regular Hybrid getting 50 mpg. For most commuters it operates as a full electric car, but can go anywhere a regular car goes and still get better mileage.
- Email this page
By gt6May 16, 2008 - 1:07pmhuh?
Does voltar LIKE being dependent on foreign oil? Does he like using a non-renewable resource?
I just don't get the reason for his comment. It just makes him look stupid.
-- McCain = Four more years of the same --
- Email this page
By dtaylo75May 16, 2008 - 1:40pmActually...
I'm getting sick of being called a planet killer because I have the gall to drive a gas-guzzling Corolla! Personally, I would be thrilled to force the towel heads and Comrade Chavez have to drink their oil.
However, that probably won't happen because:
1. We can't go find our own oil because some rare gnat may be harmed (although no one seems to care about Sahara Camels...hmmm)
2. Look at all the wonderful alternatives we have out there:
Ethanol is burning food
If we use nuclear we'll all be glowing in the dark
Windfarms kill birds and mess up Ted "the swimmer" Kennedy's million dollar view.
You get the point.
- Email this page
By voltarMay 16, 2008 - 1:52pmThen why deride
Hybrids, which can do more to reduce our dependence on imported oil than ANWR ever could?
- Email this page
By gt6May 16, 2008 - 1:55pmBecause
They don't work right for commuters. I looked at a Prius last year, but the highway mileage is worse than a new Corolla or Civic. My sister has a Ford Escape Hybrid and she spends more on gas than I do! We need a car that will go more than 50 miles on a charge and allow the option of toggling between gas and electric manually. That way if you are just coasting at 65 mpg you could run totally on battery, and if you need extra power for a hill, or the batts are running low, switch to gas.
- Email this page
By voltarMay 16, 2008 - 2:01pmYou just described
the vehicle that is the subject of this thread.
Highway commuters don't do as well with a Prius, that is true. The old Honda Insight did that job better. Stop and go commuters do very well with the Prius. A plug in version would be ideal for you. The escape has 2 shortcomings #1 it is much heavier and #2 has a bigger engine. These mean the mileage is expected to be much lower than a commuter car like Prius, but much better than a standard mini-ute.
- Email this page
By gt6May 16, 2008 - 2:49pmMy god, for once I actually agree with you
My daily commute is almost entirely at high speed on a freeway, and a true hybrid is only an advantage in stop and go, lower speed driving situations. As a result, something like what Honda and others have done makes better economic sense. The Hondas have 6 cyl engines, but only use 3 when cruising at high speed. When needed, they can get extra power by going to 4 cyl, and when a quick burst of power is needed, all 6 cyl are used. Just because everyone doesn't rush out and buy a Prius doesn't make them a planet killer. You look at what is most cost and gas-effective for your driving. Pure hybrids aren't always the optimum solution.
- Email this page
By UffdaguyMay 16, 2008 - 2:53pmalternatives
Ethanol from corn is problematic though switchgrass grown where corn or wheat are not an option is far less so.
Nuclear is FAR more expensive when all its true costs are included.
Solar and wind are the most promising but farm sites must be chosen with care. Kennedy is far more concerned with the impact on the huge tourist industry on Nantucket and Cape Cod than he is with his own view. Both wind and solar are most effective in smaller, local use. The utility companies don't like that much.
- Email this page
By gt6May 16, 2008 - 3:06pm