Fast Route to Plug in Hybrids?

By A Siegel

 visit EnergySmart for more great energy and environmental stories

 

  • Toyota
    (Prius) and Chevy (Volt) seem to be in a
    race as to who will provide the first mass-produced plug-in-hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) onto the market. The backfit
    market is building, with options coming to market for plug-in
    conversions for existing hybrids
    . But what about the 10s of millions of
    normal, internal combustion engines out there? Is there any hope for them? If Poulsen Hydrid is to be
    believed, the answer is a resounding YES.The Poulsen Hybrid Power Assist System
    “creats a PHEV by retro-fitting electric motors, DC motor controllers, storage
    batteries and an on-board charger to a conventional new or used automobile.” The
    electric system would be used for maintaining speed, after acceleration.

     

    The development is based on the observation that only 10-15 horsepower is
    required to propel a compact or mid-size automobile along a level road at a
    steady 60-70 mph. leading to the conclusion that this relatively small amount of
    electric power would be able to cope with 70-85% of normal driving, only aided
    by the combustion engine during start up and when extra energy is required for
    acceleration and hill climbing.

    The systems puts hybrid electric motors on the outside of the rear wheels
    with an onboard charger.

    The system is expected to debut on the market next month. $3300 for purchase
    and $600 for “professional installation”.

    Honestly, mark me intrigued but questioning. For example,

  • This system doesn’t have regenerative braking, thus one is simply trading
    the cost of gasoline for electricity. At $4000, a break even point comes well
    after saving 1000 gallons of gasoline. Thus, how much gasoline is really saved
    as this system basically moves the ICE to idling while the electricity handles
    acceleration.
  • The addition of this system outside the car will increase wind drag. A
    meaningful amount? Don’t know.
  • Also, some basic safety questions must arise. What are the implications for
    adding these systems outside the car?

    Some questions and reasons for wondering, but still pretty intrigued with
    this ingenious approach to tackling the challenges of the huge existing fleet of
    internal combustion engine vehicles and moving miles from gasoline to
    electricity.

    • Widespread adoption of
      PHEVs can reduce GHG emissions from vehicles by more than 450 million metric
      tons annually in 2050 – equivalent to removing 82.5 million passenger cars from
      the road.
    • There is an abundant supply
      of electricity for transportation; a 60% U.S. market share for PHEVs would use 7
      percent to 8 percent of grid-supplied electricity in 2050.

    • PHEVs can improve nationwide air quality and reduce
      petroleum consumption by 3 million to 4 million barrels per day in 2050.

      But do we have 43 years to do this?
      Why not start
      with today’s automobiles?

     

     

    Hat tip to AutoBlogGreen.

  • Comments

    (13)

    Next thing we'll be seeing....

    $1.50 per hr. plug in stations....curtousy of Exxon/Mobile.

    Plug ins

    Look for them at the Mall. Sounds like a hit to me.

    By gt6 May 16, 2008 - 12:16pm

    ...Especially if it only takes an hour! :D

    Hope it doesn't go the way of the EV1

    Hope it doesn't go the way of the EV1.

    Can some one drive a truck load of Pepto Bismal over to the 'Republican Conference on Energy'?

    They need to talk about SOLAR ENERGY without getting upset.

    But...

    What if you have to drive more than 100 feet? Won't the extension cord pull out?

    Oh, I get it...The charging stations will be only 100 feet or so apart...then it will be a simple job of hopping out and reattaching a new plug, getting back in, driving another 100 feet. I feel so warm and fuzzy inside about this brave, new radical move to save Gaia from Big Oil.

    A plug in Hybrid

    can get around 50 miles on the charge, after that it is like a regular Hybrid getting 50 mpg. For most commuters it operates as a full electric car, but can go anywhere a regular car goes and still get better mileage.

    huh?

    Does voltar LIKE being dependent on foreign oil? Does he like using a non-renewable resource?

    I just don't get the reason for his comment. It just makes him look stupid.

    -- McCain = Four more years of the same --

    Actually...

    I'm getting sick of being called a planet killer because I have the gall to drive a gas-guzzling Corolla! Personally, I would be thrilled to force the towel heads and Comrade Chavez have to drink their oil.

    However, that probably won't happen because:

    1. We can't go find our own oil because some rare gnat may be harmed (although no one seems to care about Sahara Camels...hmmm)

    2. Look at all the wonderful alternatives we have out there:
    Ethanol is burning food
    If we use nuclear we'll all be glowing in the dark
    Windfarms kill birds and mess up Ted "the swimmer" Kennedy's million dollar view.

    You get the point.

    Then why deride

    Hybrids, which can do more to reduce our dependence on imported oil than ANWR ever could?

    Because

    They don't work right for commuters. I looked at a Prius last year, but the highway mileage is worse than a new Corolla or Civic. My sister has a Ford Escape Hybrid and she spends more on gas than I do! We need a car that will go more than 50 miles on a charge and allow the option of toggling between gas and electric manually. That way if you are just coasting at 65 mpg you could run totally on battery, and if you need extra power for a hill, or the batts are running low, switch to gas.

    You just described

    the vehicle that is the subject of this thread.

    Highway commuters don't do as well with a Prius, that is true. The old Honda Insight did that job better. Stop and go commuters do very well with the Prius. A plug in version would be ideal for you. The escape has 2 shortcomings #1 it is much heavier and #2 has a bigger engine. These mean the mileage is expected to be much lower than a commuter car like Prius, but much better than a standard mini-ute.

    My god, for once I actually agree with you

    My daily commute is almost entirely at high speed on a freeway, and a true hybrid is only an advantage in stop and go, lower speed driving situations. As a result, something like what Honda and others have done makes better economic sense. The Hondas have 6 cyl engines, but only use 3 when cruising at high speed. When needed, they can get extra power by going to 4 cyl, and when a quick burst of power is needed, all 6 cyl are used. Just because everyone doesn't rush out and buy a Prius doesn't make them a planet killer. You look at what is most cost and gas-effective for your driving. Pure hybrids aren't always the optimum solution.

    alternatives

    Ethanol from corn is problematic though switchgrass grown where corn or wheat are not an option is far less so.

    Nuclear is FAR more expensive when all its true costs are included.

    Solar and wind are the most promising but farm sites must be chosen with care. Kennedy is far more concerned with the impact on the huge tourist industry on Nantucket and Cape Cod than he is with his own view. Both wind and solar are most effective in smaller, local use. The utility companies don't like that much.

    Comments

    (13)