Michael Moore: How to Fix Wall Street

By Michael Moore

 

The richest 400 Americans -- that's right, just four hundred people -- own MORE than the bottom 150 million Americans combined. 400 rich Americans have got more stashed away than half the entire country! Their combined net worth is $1.6 trillion. During the eight years of the Bush Administration, their wealth has increased by nearly $700 billion -- the same amount that they are now demanding we give to them for the "bailout." Why don't they just spend the money they made under Bush to bail themselves out? They'd still have nearly a trillion dollars left over to spread amongst themselves!

Of course, they are not going to do that -- at least not voluntarily. George W. Bush was handed a $127 billion surplus when Bill Clinton left office. Because that money was OUR money and not his, he did what the rich prefer to do -- spend it and never look back. Now we have a $9.5 trillion debt. Why on earth would we even think of giving these robber barons any more of our money?

I would like to propose my own bailout plan. My suggestions, listed below, are predicated on the singular and simple belief that the rich must pull themselves up by their own platinum bootstraps. Sorry, fellows, but you drilled it into our heads one too many times: There... is... no... free... lunch. And thank you for encouraging us to hate people on welfare! So, there will be no handouts from us to you. The Senate, tonight, is going to try to rush their version of a "bailout" bill to a vote. They must be stopped. We did it on Monday with the House, and we can do it again today with the Senate.

It is clear, though, that we cannot simply keep protesting without proposing exactly what it is we think Congress should do. So, after consulting with a number of people smarter than Phil Gramm, here is my proposal, now known as "Mike's Rescue Plan." It has 10 simple, straightforward points. They are:

1. APPOINT A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR TO CRIMINALLY INDICT ANYONE ON WALL STREET WHO KNOWINGLY CONTRIBUTED TO THIS COLLAPSE. Before any new money is expended, Congress must commit, by resolution, to criminally prosecute anyone who had anything to do with the attempted sacking of our economy. This means that anyone who committed insider trading, securities fraud or any action that helped bring about this collapse must go to jail. This Congress must call for a Special Prosecutor who will vigorously go after everyone who created the mess, and anyone else who attempts to scam the public in the future.

2. THE RICH MUST PAY FOR THEIR OWN BAILOUT. They may have to live in 5 houses instead of 7. They may have to drive 9 cars instead of 13. The chef for their mini-terriers may have to be reassigned. But there is no way in hell, after forcing family incomes to go down more than $2,000 dollars during the Bush years, that working people and the middle class are going to fork over one dime to underwrite the next yacht purchase.

If they truly need the $700 billion they say they need, well, here is an easy way they can raise it:

a) Every couple who makes over a million dollars a year and every single taxpayer who makes over $500,000 a year will pay a 10% surcharge tax for five years. (It's the Senator Sanders plan. He's like Colonel Sanders, only he's out to fry the right chickens.) That means the rich will still be paying less income tax than when Carter was president. This will raise a total of $300 billion.

b) Like nearly every other democracy, charge a 0.25% tax on every stock transaction. This will raise more than $200 billion in a year.

c) Because every stockholder is a patriotic American, stockholders will forgo receiving a dividend check for one quarter and instead this money will go the treasury to help pay for the bailout.

d) 25% of major U.S. corporations currently pay NO federal income tax. Federal corporate tax revenues currently amount to 1.7% of the GDP compared to 5% in the 1950s. If we raise the corporate income tax back to the level of the 1950s, that gives us an extra $500 billion.

All of this combined should be enough to end the calamity. The rich will get to keep their mansions and their servants, and our United States government ("COUNTRY FIRST!") will have a little leftover to repair some roads, bridges and schools.

3. BAIL OUT THE PEOPLE LOSING THEIR HOMES, NOT THE PEOPLE WHO WILL BUILD AN EIGHTH HOME. There are 1.3 million homes in foreclosure right now. That is what is at the heart of this problem. So instead of giving the money to the banks as a gift, pay down each of these mortgages by $100,000. Force the banks to renegotiate the mortgage so the homeowner can pay on its current value. To insure that this help does no go to speculators and those who have tried to make money by flipping houses, this bailout is only for people's primary residence. And in return for the $100K paydown on the existing mortgage, the government gets to share in the holding of the mortgage so that it can get some of its money back. Thus, the total initial cost of fixing the mortgage crisis at its roots (instead of with the greedy lenders) is $150 billion, not $700 billion.

And let's set the record straight. People who have defaulted on their mortgages are not "bad risks." They are our fellow Americans, and all they wanted was what we all want and most of us still get: a home to call their own. But during the Bush years, millions of them lost the decent paying jobs they had. Six million fell into poverty. Seven million lost their health insurance. And every one of them saw their real wages go down by $2,000. Those who dare to look down on these Americans who got hit with one bad break after another should be ashamed. We are a better, stronger, safer and happier society when all of our citizens can afford to live in a home that they own.

4. IF YOUR BANK OR COMPANY GETS ANY OF OUR MONEY IN A "BAILOUT," THEN WE OWN YOU. Sorry, that's how it's done. If the bank gives me money so I can buy a house, the bank "owns" that house until I pay it all back -- with interest. Same deal for Wall Street. Whatever money you need to stay afloat, if our government considers you a safe risk -- and necessary for the good of the country -- then you can get a loan, but we will own you. If you default, we will sell you. This is how the Swedish government did it and it worked.

5. ALL REGULATIONS MUST BE RESTORED. THE REAGAN REVOLUTION IS DEAD. This catastrophe happened because we let the fox have the keys to the henhouse. In 1999, Phil Gramm authored a bill to remove all the regulations that governed Wall Street and our banking system. The bill passed and Clinton signed it. Here's what Sen. Phil Gramm, McCain's chief economic advisor, said at the bill signing:

"In the 1930s ... it was believed that government was the answer. It was believed that stability and growth came from government overriding the functioning of free markets.


"We are here today to repeal [that] because we have learned that government is not the answer. We have learned that freedom and competition are the answers. We have learned that we promote economic growth and we promote stability by having competition and freedom.

"I am proud to be here because this is an important bill; it is a deregulatory bill. I believe that that is the wave of the future, and I am awfully proud to have been a part of making it a reality."

This bill must be repealed. Bill Clinton can help by leading the effort for the repeal of the Gramm bill and the reinstating of even tougher regulations regarding our financial institutions. And when they're done with that, they can restore the regulations for the airlines, the inspection of our food, the oil industry, OSHA, and every other entity that affects our daily lives. All oversight provisions for any "bailout" must have enforcement monies attached to them and criminal penalties for all offenders.

6. IF IT'S TOO BIG TO FAIL, THEN THAT MEANS IT'S TOO BIG TO EXIST. Allowing the creation of these mega-mergers and not enforcing the monopoly and anti-trust laws has allowed a number of financial institutions and corporations to become so large, the very thought of their collapse means an even bigger collapse across the entire economy. No one or two companies should have this kind of power. The so-called "economic Pearl Harbor" can't happen when you have hundreds -- thousands -- of institutions where people have their money. When you have a dozen auto companies, if one goes belly-up, we don't face a national disaster. If you have three separately-owned daily newspapers in your town, then one media company can't call all the shots (I know... What am I thinking?! Who reads a paper anymore? Sure glad all those mergers and buyouts left us with a strong and free press!). Laws must be enacted to prevent companies from being so large and dominant that with one slingshot to the eye, the giant falls and dies. And no institution should be allowed to set up money schemes that no one can understand. If you can't explain it in two sentences, you shouldn't be taking anyone's money.

7. NO EXECUTIVE SHOULD BE PAID MORE THAN 40 TIMES THEIR AVERAGE EMPLOYEE, AND NO EXECUTIVE SHOULD RECEIVE ANY KIND OF "PARACHUTE" OTHER THAN THE VERY GENEROUS SALARY HE OR SHE MADE WHILE WORKING FOR THE COMPANY. In 1980, the average American CEO made 45 times what their employees made. By 2003, they were making 254 times what their workers made. After 8 years of Bush, they now make over 400 times what their average employee makes. How this can happen at publicly held companies is beyond reason. In Britain, the average CEO makes 28 times what their average employee makes. In Japan, it's only 17 times! The last I heard, the CEO of Toyota was living the high life in Tokyo. How does he do it on so little money? Seriously, this is an outrage. We have created the mess we're in by letting the people at the top become bloated beyond belief with millions of dollars. This has to stop. Not only should no executive who receives help out of this mess profit from it, but any executive who was in charge of running his company into the ground should be fired before the company receives any help.

8. STRENGTHEN THE FDIC AND MAKE IT A MODEL FOR PROTECTING NOT ONLY PEOPLE'S SAVINGS, BUT ALSO THEIR PENSIONS AND THEIR HOMES. Obama was correct yesterday to propose expanding FDIC protection of people's savings in their banks to $250,000. But this same sort of government insurance must be given to our nation's pension funds. People should never have to worry about whether or not the money they've put away for their old age will be there. This will mean strict government oversight of companies who manage their employees' funds -- or perhaps it means that the companies will have to turn over those funds and their management to the government. People's private retirement funds must also be protected, but perhaps it's time to consider not having one's retirement invested in the casino known as the stock market. Our government should have a solemn duty to guarantee that no one who grows old in this country has to worry about ending up destitute.

9. EVERYBODY NEEDS TO TAKE A DEEP BREATH, CALM DOWN, AND NOT LET FEAR RULE THE DAY. Turn off the TV! We are not in the Second Great Depression. The sky is not falling. Pundits and politicians are lying to us so fast and furious it's hard not to be affected by all the fear mongering. Even I, yesterday, wrote to you and repeated what I heard on the news, that the Dow had the biggest one day drop in its history. Well, that's true in terms of points, but its 7% drop came nowhere close to Black Monday in 1987 when the stock market in one day lost 23% of its value. In the '80s, 3,000 banks closed, but America didn't go out of business. These institutions have always had their ups and downs and eventually it works out. It has to, because the rich do not like their wealth being disrupted! They have a vested interest in calming things down and getting back into the Jacuzzi.

As crazy as things are right now, tens of thousands of people got a car loan this week. Thousands went to the bank and got a mortgage to buy a home. Students just back to college found banks more than happy to put them into hock for the next 15 years with a student loan. Life has gone on. Not a single person has lost any of their money if it's in a bank or a treasury note or a CD. And the most amazing thing is that the American public hasn't bought the scare campaign. The citizens didn't blink, and instead told Congress to take that bailout and shove it. THAT was impressive. Why didn't the population succumb to the fright-filled warnings from their president and his cronies? Well, you can only say 'Saddam has da bomb' so many times before the people realize you're a lying sack of shite. After eight long years, the nation is worn out and simply can't take it any longer.

10. CREATE A NATIONAL BANK, A "PEOPLE'S BANK." If we really are itching to print up a trillion dollars, instead of giving it to a few rich people, why don't we give it to ourselves? Now that we own Freddie and Fannie, why not set up a people's bank? One that can provide low-interest loans for all sorts of people who want to own a home, start a small business, go to school, come up with the cure for cancer or create the next great invention. And now that we own AIG, the country's largest insurance company, let's take the next step and provide health insurance for everyone. Medicare for all. It will save us so much money in the long run. And we won't be 12th on the life expectancy list. We'll be able to have a longer life, enjoying our government-protected pension, and living to see the day when the corporate criminals who caused so much misery are let out of prison so that we can help reacclimate them to civilian life -- a life with one nice home and a gas-free car that was invented with help from the People's Bank.

Yours,
Michael Moore
MMFlint@aol.com
MichaelMoore.com

P.S. Call your Senators now. Here's a backup link in case we crash that site again. They are going to attempt their own version of the Looting of America tonight. And let your reps know if you agree with my 10-point plan.

also posted on Huffington Post

Comments

(28)

I support Michael Moore's

10 Point Rescue Plan!!

Good thinking there Michael!
Where are our brilliant Harvard educated politicians?
CoyoteMan

He forgot one

#11, Take #1 and add it to Fanny & Freddi.

Fanny and Freddi are not the

Fanny and Freddi are not the only institutions that went down. You sure are fixated on those. It was poor money management from people who supposedly were educated to know better. I guess an MBA isn't worth much when greed overcomes common sense.

You're missing a few

Like Bear Stearns. And WaMu. And IndyMac.

Oh, that's right. It doesn't count unless it's a government agency. My bad.

If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error. ~~~John Kenneth Galbraith

Fannie and Freddi weren't

Fannie and Freddi weren't government institutions. That was a common misconception.

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/51940.html

The current takeover makes them so, but they were operating as private institutions before.

"Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed." Dwight Eisenhower

I don't think

Wall Street isn't a government institution either...at least until we bail it out to the tune of $800B. What's your point? The commneter said that in addition to looking for crooks on Wall Street, we should look for them at Freddie and Fannie, plus IndyMac, Bear Stearns, Wachiovia, WaMu, et al I agree. Trouble is, you're not going to find "illegal activity" since John McSame and Foreclosure Phil Graham made all the avarice legal.

By MichtouOctober 4, 2008 - 2:35pm

From Wikipedia:

"Fannie Mae was founded as a government agency in 1938 as part of Franklin Delano Roosevelt's New Deal to provide liquidity to the mortgage market. For the next thirty years, Fannie Mae held a virtual monopoly on the secondary mortgage market in the United States.

In 1968, to remove the activity of Fannie Mae from the annual balance sheet of the federal budget, it was converted into a private corporation.[6] Fannie Mae ceased to be the guarantor of government-issued mortgages, and that responsibility was transferred to the new Government National Mortgage Association (Ginnie Mae). In 1995, Fannie Mae began receiving affordable housing credit for buying subprime securities. In 1999, the Clinton administration and Fannie Mae shareholders encouraged the lender to increase the number of mortgage loans offered to those of low and moderate income, both to improve rates of home ownership among those groups and to increase profits.[7]

In 2000, due to a re-assessment of the housing market by HUD, anti-predatory lending rules were put into place that disallowed risky, high-cost loans from being credited toward affordable housing goals. In 2004, these rules were dropped and high-risk loans were again counted toward affordable housing goals.[8]

Fannie Mae was put under a conservatorship of the U.S. Federal government on September 7, 2008."

While these organizations may not have been part of the federal government, that's how they began. And they still carried an implied partnership with the government. Note the part that discusses rules against risky loans were dropped (again) in '04. Seems interesting that it's now late 2008 and there is a full on meltdown happening. Funny thing is that something like 94% of homeowners are still paying on their home loans. So what's really going on here? I would argue that it has little to do with risky mortgages and much more to do with shrinking wages and inflated health care costs. Just my two bits.

Good post KW

More to do with... I would add, a shell game between the banks where the bundled mortgages made the rounds as derivitives, being stripped of the sound loans and passed on as higher yield product while still maintaining a AAA rating. I wouldn't be shocked to find out that wholesale raiding of the vaults were going on under the cover of bad loans.

I think a lot of it had to

I think a lot of it had to do with bad business practices by people who should have known better because they thought they could get away with it and make money in the process. I think our bailout stinks to high heaven and should have a lot of strings attached to it.

MM is right on target, but it'll never happen.

Too many fellow citizens spend their lives clueless. The greatest of all G0Per dreams was to diminish the public school system and they did.

Eventually the gallows and guillotines will come out and those 400 and probably thousands more will be eradicated bearing the same stunned death mash of all tyrants.
It is always about the money.

Sounds good to me.

Nice picture you painted, KS! We could make a reality show out of it... "When Angry Mobs Attack", " ( No) Survivor", or even " World's Most Extreme Haircuts".

This just in...

Film maker extraodinaire Michael Moore has decided that that whole "ten point plan" would expose the fact that he is one of the rich elites he has vowed to "bring down".Therefore in lieu of said "ten point plan", he will eat all 400 of the Wall Street power players.

Mr.Moore has devised 400 recipes so the task doesn't become as boring as his movies.Moore has estimated this will take approximately two days so he can pace himself.Moore considered donating the execs to hunger riddled nations but, though"screw them" I'll make a movie of me eating them and show it to the hungry at matinee prices

Al gore weighed in with his concern that the charcoal used to cook the execs and Moore's methane output will increase Wall Sts. carbon footprint tenfold.Moore responded"global warming is as fake as my concern of Middle Class America you dope."

More details to follow.....

Dew yerself

Michael Moore is not even close to being on this list. Even being a billionaire does not get you on it. On averager the top 400 have $4 billion apiece. One of the ways that these people have to get people like you voting against your own best interest is to fog the lines so people think they are closer to the top than they are. That way they will vote against a tax increase for those in the top 2%, beacause they think it means them, or might if they get a raise. Even John McCain thinks you are not rich unless you make 5 million.

Gt6....

thank you for your astute observation.I'm well aware of the fact that Moore isn't a billionaire 4 times over.

His movies stank...he's lucky to be a thousandaire.

Yawn.

"She's Bush in drag." Naomi Klein, discussing Sarah Palin's style of governing

Look who's back

Another republicunt Sissy Boy crawls out of his hole (or his mom's). Your boss must really be getting desperate, what with Obama so far ahead in every poll, huh, Sissy Boy?

You don't have to burn books to destroy a culture. Just get people to stop reading them.
---Ray Bradbury

Who gives a shit what that

Who gives a shit what that fat piece of socialist shit thinks? No one except you lefties and of coursePukie who can't seem to keep a husband.

LOL - You're a regular fucking riot, cracker!

Try as your white trash ass might, your pathetic insults do not bother me.

But please, humor me with more of your witless ... wit.

"She's Bush in drag." Naomi Klein, discussing Sarah Palin's style of governing

Hey there High Yellah...

I did some Praying in Tongues (a-lala-nana-yahyah-fa-fa-fa;praise jezuss la-la-la-la-la, sound familiar cracker?) and praise Him I got a Word of Knowledge for you, directly from your Master:

You don't have to burn books to destroy a culture. Just get people to stop reading them.
---Ray Bradbury

Apparently millions of people care what Moore thinks.

They keep seeing his movies and buying the DVDs, Gomer.

Bebe

I copied Moore's ten points and sent them to my rabid right-wing brother in law, minus the attribution to Moore. HE AGREED with most of what was written...until he found out that MM wrote it. Then it was socialist drivel. Amazing how the messanger has "moore" to do with the acceptance of the message than the message itself. Repugs love the fat-mouthed limp-dicked oxycontin addict, even though nothing but crap comes out of his mouth.

Flying Pigs and Frozen Lakes in Hell

I never thought I'd see the day when I agree with Michael Moore on anything, and while I'd care to argue some of the fine print, I like the overall plan. Bad news, Mr. Moore, though is that Lionel says you and I are mouth breating idiots because we don't think it's a great idea to hand $700bil to Wall St.

Lionel is the classic DLC east coast democrat

who sits on the fence so much he has a stake embedded in his ass.
He's no better than a republican.

By thaelmann37October 3, 2008 - 2:38pm

Any chance that stake can be removed and stuck in his chest cavity where a heart should be?

I dunno KW.

Who cares? Deer season is coming up and soon we can go ice fishing!
Come on winter!

10 points are vague

Point 1 - How in the world could you go after and look at "everyone". Mike needs to be a little more specific here.

Point 2 a - Why punish those that earn 500K? Why not 250K? Why was 500K chosen, makes no sense.

Point 2 b,c,d - Will affect all Americans. I don't want to be taxed more, do you? I thought this was about the top 400.

Point 3 - So I should allow my house to go into foreclosure to get 100k? Why not. Lets all do it. Either stop paying your mortgage or go buy a home you can't afford.

Point 4 - Do we really want our government in the banking business?

Point 5 - And this includes the community reinvestment act? And dissolve Freddie and Fannie too, correct?

Point 6 - Restricting corporate growth? To what extent? Who is to say how large a company can get?

Point 7 - Limiting a person's income in the public sector is just a bad idea. Accountability is a better solution. This needs to be set by the stockholders.

Point 8 - Just a security blanket. Does not really do anything to help the current situation or deter future problems. Most people were aware of the current 100k limit and acted accordingly.

Point 9 - I agree

Point 10 - I prefer Capitalism over Socialism.

OK

1) you do it by starting with the easy ones, turning them to get more info and you keep going to the top. It's not rocket science it's just doing a proper investigation the way law enforcement has been practiced for decades.

2) NO not ALL Americans, but more than just the top. Nobody wants to be taxed more but Bush already spent the money (or through his mismanagement caused it to be necessary) so it must be collected, one way or another.

3) This is only for homes that are in foreclosure. If you are not already behind you would not gain by taking advantage here. I would suggest the buyout amount doesn't usually need to be so high and should be a sliding scale, % of the total.

4)Why not? We know how bad private management can be. Despite Raygun's little dig, government is not all bad.

5) Of course not. and Fannie and Freddie don't need to dissolve, just be nationalized.

6) I would say that when any corporate tail is capable of wagging the government dog, it is too big.

7) That's is exactly what we have now and it has been a disaster. Maybe a limit is not the best way. How about we go back to the 96% tax bracket over 2 million a year and disallow deduction of any salary over a million from corporate tax?

8) the limit has been set at 100k since 1980. It is overdue for an increase. Yes most people are aware of it but there is really no other safe alternative.

9) good

10) The people's bank would not replace all private banks. You could still take your chances there. Just like with Health insurance, private business is scared shitless of competing with the government.

Greetings, Spanky!

So, are Rove's people paying you a whole twenty-five cents this close to an election? I bet that will buy you a lot of leather undies!

http://www.britishspanking.com/forums/member.php?u=2965

DOG Almighty, you republicunts are into some pervy-ass shit!

You don't have to burn books to destroy a culture. Just get people to stop reading them.
---Ray Bradbury

Comments

(28)