Sarah Palin Wanted To Ban Books From The Library
I'm just shaking my head. This kind of blatant attempt at censorship enrages me. Sure her base loves it though. I just scoped the article, but she does not go over well from what I can see.
Stein says that as mayor, Palin continued to inject religious beliefs into her policy at times. "She asked the library how she could go about banning books," he says, because some voters thought they had inappropriate language in them. "The librarian was aghast." The librarian, Mary Ellen Baker, couldn't be reached for comment, but news reports from the time show that Palin had threatened to fire her for not giving "full support" to the mayor.
- Original article
- FILED UNDER: Guest Blogger
- September 2, 2008
Hubba bubba
bigga badda hunky dorey bananafana cheese wiz.
That's about all I had time to type before this blog subject rolls down the light speed conveyor belt.
Who the fuck wants to debate shit anyway, right my ADHD friends at AAR?
- Email this page
By AntillectualSeptember 2, 2008 - 12:25pmI'm with ya Anti
Is this the best we can do?
"bigga badda hunky dorey bananafana cheese wiz."
Loved it - very funny
- Email this page
By houndogSeptember 2, 2008 - 12:48pmSarah Palin (aka Bitches be Crazy!)
There has to be an ulterior motive with Palin's selection as VP. She is not the best qualified person for the job by far; even Romney would be a much more sensible choice as a leader. I'm sure the Neocons needed an empty-headed puppet like Bush they can control, once McCain suddenly passes away.
McCain's greatest virtue is that he is not Obama. All these so-called Conservatives are supporting him solely for that reason. If Obama were Republican, all these right wingers would lining up to suck his dick and proclaim him the second coming of Reagan. Look at how they were kissing up to Lieberman (formerly 'Loserman') at the convention. It's not about ideology, it's about being on "Their Team".
The stories about her Mongoloid baby don't add up either.
Jim Jam Jabootie!!!
- Email this page
By yomommafooSeptember 3, 2008 - 6:48pmYeah, you're gonna hear alot of bitching about Palin....
She took on Republicans and Democrats in Alaska. Of course they're going to try and shit on her. God you people are afraid of women.
"When in danger, when in doubt...run in circles....scream and shout".
How the democrats plan to deal with the fact that the Republican VP selection has more executive exprience than their Presidential nominee
- Email this page
By IlluminatiHottieSeptember 2, 2008 - 12:26pmAnd yet you are a neocon
who enjoys being in a party that shits on women. Still taking those "flights" to the package store I see.
- Email this page
By hufflarry2000September 2, 2008 - 12:30pmDems don't have to do a thing to her....
she's done it all herself. I could care less if she was a woman or man, dem or repub. Her abuse of power is indefensible, except to repubs, who look upon it as a badge of honor.
As for the ridiculous talking point that she has more experience than Obama, you can put that one to bed. It has been hilarious watching McCain's handlers try (and fail miserably) to point out any of her decisions. She is an empty vessel that repubs are trying to claim is overflowing with knowledge and experience.
I'm not afraid of women...I'm rather fond of them. Of course, I like to make an exception in your case. It's hard to be fond of someone who combines such arrogance and ignorance in one package. And you're about as fearsome as Pee Wee Herman....but nowhere near as funny!
- Email this page
By UffdaguySeptember 2, 2008 - 12:35pmIt's even more ridiculous to
It's even more ridiculous to say that Obama has experience.
- Email this page
By jumpingjackflashSeptember 2, 2008 - 12:51pmYeah, I guess the 4 years in the Senate doesn't count as much
as being mayor of a town of 6700.
Repub dimwits are so hilarious!
- Email this page
By UffdaguySeptember 2, 2008 - 12:52pmWow! 4 whole years! He
Wow! 4 whole years! He didn't even chair a committee during those fabulous 4 years.
- Email this page
By jumpingjackflashSeptember 2, 2008 - 3:04pmSo?
She had to bring her own chair to her City Council meetings, just so she'd have a place to sit!
Any more meaningless dribblings you'd like to spill? Might as well get them all out now, while I still have the mop and bucket handy.
McCain/Palin '08: the also-rans.
- Email this page
By nonexistent manSeptember 2, 2008 - 3:50pmUmmm.. Of course not... How could he?
Apparently, you really haven't a fucking clue how the Senate works.
You just keep flapping your jaws there, jerkingjumpjackoff... that's what you're good at.
- Email this page
By A GSeptember 2, 2008 - 4:03pmObama has experience and something even better
Obama has good judgment!
I'll take good judgment over a lifetime of experience any day.
"...religion, in and of itself, ...is neither good nor bad... it is like a knife. When you use a knife for cutting bread, it’s good. If you use that knife to stick into somebody’s guts, it’s bad." - Bishop Desmond Tutu
- Email this page
By rafitch71September 2, 2008 - 1:29pmTake the blinders off
She was mayor of a town with about 8,000 people. Obama organized more people than that just in the South side of Chicago. And Governor of Alaska isn't exactly a monumental job. The whole population of Alaska is about a sixth of the population of Chicago. You go ahead and vote for the insane old guy and the vindictive woman, you were going to anyway. But don't think that the disenchanted Hillary supporters are going to flock to McCain just because Palin is on the ticket. She is antithetical to everything Hillary worked for.
She took on Republicans and Democrats in Alaska.
She took on her sister's ex-husband and fired the person who wouldn't fire the ex-husband.
It's got nothing to do with her being a woman. It's got everything to do with her being bad for America.
"...religion, in and of itself, ...is neither good nor bad... it is like a knife. When you use a knife for cutting bread, it’s good. If you use that knife to stick into somebody’s guts, it’s bad." - Bishop Desmond Tutu
- Email this page
By rafitch71September 2, 2008 - 12:59pmBetter ask Trooper Mike Wooten
...if HE'S afraid of her.
Or how about the entire Agriculture and Conservation Board?
McCain/Palin '08: the also-rans.
- Email this page
By nonexistent manSeptember 2, 2008 - 1:02pm"Bitching"??... Kinda of a sexist term, isn't it Illuminati?
And it's called "vetting" not "shitting".
Excuse me if I'm not ready to hand over our NUCLEAR LAUNCH CODES to a beauty queen with a comunications degree (a retard major) from Idaho whose "experience" is a year and a half governing a state with a population LESS THAN ONE-THIRD THAT OF BROOKLYN.
And the WORST thing??... She doesn't believe in science, which makes her JUST PLAIN STUPID.
She's a disaster.
She's under investigation for her Cheeney-esque disregard for the rule of law.
Her medieval adherence to "abstinance only" sex education has been proven TO INCREASE teenage pregnancy AS SHE NOW KNOWS BETTER THAT ANYONE.
========================
By the way... LOVED YOU in "About Schmidt", deary.. Later!
- Email this page
By A GSeptember 2, 2008 - 1:33pmBy A GSeptember 2, 2008 - 2:33pm
Kathy Bates is excellent! A great actor.
- Email this page
By f u bush2September 2, 2008 - 1:42pmThat would be "Actress"
But maybe you were right the first time.....
- Email this page
By houndogSeptember 2, 2008 - 1:44pmBy houndogSeptember 2, 2008 - 2:44pm
No actor is applicable to both sexes. Actress is quaint. It's perfectly fine. But I use actor for both sexes.
- Email this page
By f u bush2September 2, 2008 - 2:41pmAgreed, Point is Moot
I do like KB as well - great "actor".
- Email this page
By houndogSeptember 2, 2008 - 2:44pmDoes A G really stand for
AnalCavern Giganticus?
No one is really interested in you posting photos of your wife, you sick puppy.
Absolutely Gross dude
- Email this page
By houndogSeptember 2, 2008 - 1:43pmBy houndogSeptember 2, 2008 - 2:43pm
Sorry HD
The board is what it is.
- Email this page
By f u bush2September 2, 2008 - 1:45pmI know - but
You guys have so much fun with Shedd and huffy I thought I'd get a few yucks with "Mr. Bold Face".
Good blogging last week, remarkably troll-free - guess we're back to Pee Wee's Playhouse with some of the regulars.
Try as I might, Palin just doesn't upset me that much - one of her first acts as governor was to veto a bill that would have cut off health care benefits to gay partners of public employees.
And can anyone who puts corrupt reepers in jail be THAT bad? Hell, if she's elected VP, that would be her full time job!
Now that's change I can believe in!
- Email this page
By houndogSeptember 2, 2008 - 2:02pmOh yes!
Thank God you rode in on your Contarded horse to act as the voice of reason on this forum!
Thank GOD you Republicans have come to our aid TO RESCUE US FROM YEARS OF REPUBLICAN CORRUPTION AND LAWLESSNESS.
Phew! Thank heavens the fox is here to protect the henhouse from those foxes!
FUCK OFF!
IT'S INSULTING HOW YOU THINK AMERICANS ARE STUPID ENOUGH TO FALL FOR YOUR CRAP.
- Email this page
By A GSeptember 2, 2008 - 2:12pmNot All Americans
Just You.
Do you really think of yourself as a hen?
That would explain a lot.
- Email this page
By houndogSeptember 2, 2008 - 2:17pmLike I said... I knew you'd obsess.
.
- Email this page
By A GSeptember 2, 2008 - 3:49pmYAWN!
ZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzz...
================
Your ruse has been exposed.
You have no credibility.
You can go now.... OH!... BETTER YET!... NOW THAT I'VE MADE A COMPLETE FOOL OF YOU, WHY DON'T YOU HANG AROUND AND OBSSESS ON ME!
I LOVE that!... (*snicker*!)
- Email this page
By A GSeptember 2, 2008 - 1:49pmDude
Do you have to SNORE in boldface?
"I LOVE that!... (*milky way*!)" - I've taken the liberty of removing your nuts from the candy bar.
Maybe you could try italics next time.
- Email this page
By houndogSeptember 2, 2008 - 2:10pmI KNEW you'd obsess.
Whatsamatter, jackass?... Did I embarrass you?.. Hurt your pride, little boy??... Can't stop thinking about getting back at me??
YOU'RE PATHETIC!
You know, the OTHER "concern troll" KvnRJohnson resorted to assuming the role of "FONT POLICEMAN" as well.
Can't compete on the substance so attack the style??... HOW REPUBLICAN OF YOU.
Pardon me for having a personality... we can't all be as exciting as Joe Leiberman.
====================
Know what Mr. Font Policeman??... I think you just might BE KvnRJohnson.
- Email this page
By A GSeptember 2, 2008 - 3:42pmBy A GSeptember 2, 2008 - 4:42pm
Watch out A G. Don't mention what John called Cindy. HD is very sensitive. LOL
- Email this page
By f u bush2September 2, 2008 - 3:46pmAt the risk of sounding civil....
There is no factual basis for that urban legend. "3 reporters from Arizona who insisted on anonymity".
How convenient.
Repeating this unsubstantiated and unsubstantiatable crap (3 guys in a bar - talking - all of sudden one of them says "hey guys, remember 16 years ago John called his wife a c***? Hey let's call up that guy doing the new bio - he's looking for nasty unsubstantiaed dirt to help sell his boo< so this one will be good for a few free drinks. Let's just tell him he c*** use - ooops - "can't" use our names because we are so courageous and brave".) is just nasty and misogynistic. There is no, repeat, no evidence that this ever happened, no way of verifying and just shows how desperate some people are to demonize those they don't agree with.
How would you react to someone stating "according to 3 reporters who asked to remain anonymous, 4 years ago when Obama was running for Senator his wife discouraged him - he then called her a (fill in the blank)"?
The fact that you can google dozens of references to this without any substance just shows how susceptible people are to swallowing bullshit as long as someone sprinkles a little of their favorite partisan sauce on it.
Am I too "sensitive" to swallow bullshit? Yeah, guess I am. This is as bad as reepers and their "Obama is a muslim" crap. Why do you expect them to knock it off if we indulge in the same tactics? I will not take partisan cheap shots from either side as acceptable. It's called a "principle".
"A new biography about the GOP Presidential nominee, The Real McCain by Cliff Schechter, reveals a disturbing incident in which a hot-headed John McCain humiliated his wife in front of campaign aides and the press with a monumental blow-up. According to the book, "Three reporters from Arizona, on the condition of anonymity, also let me in on another incident involving McCain's intemperateness. In his 1992 Senate bid, McCain was joined on the campaign trail by his wife, Cindy, as well as campaign aide Doug Cole and consultant Wes Gullett. At one point, Cindy playfully twirled McCain's hair and said, 'You're getting a little thin up there.' McCain's face reddened, and he responded, 'At least I don't plaster on the makeup like a trollop, you c--t.' [EXPLETIVE IS NOT DELETED OR MODIFIED IN THE BOOK] McCain's excuse was that it had been a long day. If elected president of the United States, McCain would have many long days."
- Email this page
By houndogSeptember 2, 2008 - 4:38pmI think your really that "hatey" person everyone talks about.
I do recall them accusing KvnRJohnson of being "hatey", now they are accusing you of being KvnRJohnson. So, who are you? LOL
- Email this page
By momofukuSeptember 2, 2008 - 4:42pmNothin Special -
Don't have more than 1 blog handle (sorry guys)
Would describe myself as a Social Progressive, defense & fiscal conservative, Obama supporter (since day 1 - unlike many on this board)
Detest the Clintons almost as much as GWB. Few things are worse for our system than corruption at the highest levels.
Despise and seek to ridicule unmercifully bloggers who constantly spew unfounded hate propaganda (as opposed to legitimate fact based criticism), usually accompanied by inarticulate gutter cursing.
A strong supporter of women's rights - particularly the right to disagree with my views without being called horrible things.
I have learned a lot on this blog from all who participate with links to good sources, reasoned arguments and especially those who have a sense of humor. It is readily apparent who they are, but sometimes they lapse. As do I - no one's perfect.
Advice - don't give up your principles - recognize that you are outnumbered, and always, always try to stick to facts and try to have some fun along the way.
- Email this page
By houndogSeptember 2, 2008 - 4:54pmBy houndogSeptember 2, 2008 - 5:54pm
He also believes in "islamofascists"
- Email this page
By f u bush2September 2, 2008 - 4:58pmBy f u bush2September 2, 2008 - 5:58pm
No doubt. Silly bastard. Everyone knows the correct (if not politically correct) title is "annoying ragheads that need a Tomahawk cruise missile in the ass."
Right? That's what you meant right?
- Email this page
By Kill-WhiteySeptember 2, 2008 - 5:05pmBy Kill-WhiteySeptember 2, 2008 - 6:05pm
silly contard
9/11
9/11
9/11
Syria
9/11
9/11
mushroom clouds
9/11
9/11
Why aren't you advocating war with Syria? All your friends say the wmd of Iraq went there. Wasn't the reason (one of them anyway) for invading to keep those out of the hands of terrorists? Is Syria less likely to talk to terrorists than Iraq was?
Looks to me like you should be worried about all those mushroom clouds Bush, Cheney and Rice were talking about on the TV back in 2002/2003.
Spread the word:
9/11
9/11
Syria
9/11
9/11
Mushroom clouds
9/11
9/11
- Email this page
By f u bush2September 2, 2008 - 5:12pmBy f u bush2September 2, 2008 - 6:12pm
Israel is already on top of that one chief. No problem there.
- Email this page
By Kill-WhiteySeptember 2, 2008 - 5:20pmBy Kill-WhiteySeptember 2, 2008 - 6:20pm
Right....
You people are loopy. Seems to me we were on "that one" in iraq when we had inspectors there who uncovered what? a handful of missiles that went 50 miles too far? Yet they found them and Saddam handed them over. How many inspectors does Israel have in Syria?
You seem awfully laid back about these wmd that you people claim were moved from Iraq to Syria. What if Bush were to say it?:
9/11
9/11
Syria Mushroom clouds
9/11
9/11
Would that help? Would you then be out mocking the anti war people again?
- Email this page
By f u bush2September 2, 2008 - 5:25pmBy f u bush2September 2, 2008 - 6:25pm
I don't really believe that there is much in the way of WMDs in Syria. It's easy to be laid back about it.
Many of those inspectors thought the US was going to find something (although they thought it was too early to tell for certain).
And I don't need to mock the anti-war people, they do a good enough job of looking ridiculous as it is.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AmdrkmtkCw4
http://www.kstp.com/
- Email this page
By Kill-WhiteySeptember 2, 2008 - 5:48pmBy Kill-WhiteySeptember 2, 2008 - 6:48pm
They look ridiculous? Back in 2002/2003 when they were saying let's hold off?
I think Bush looked more ridiculous crawling around the floor at the press club meeting pretending to look for wmd while soldiers were dying for his stupidity. Tell me that didn't look ridiculous!
- Email this page
By f u bush2September 2, 2008 - 5:50pmBy f u bush2September 2, 2008 - 6:50pm
I think we can all agree that Bush has had plenty of moments that can be clearly marked foolish. But I don't think that acting stupid is any less stupid just because it's on the opposite end of the political spectrum.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_-TBirrPiQ
Yep, I'd much rather be associated with the guy that makes a tasteless joke and looks dumb than the people that feel it's acceptable to call a marine a war criminal or spit on a veteran. Funny thing is that these people claim that it's about the American casualties and how much they care about the troops, but most of them never ask any veterans how they feel about it or only base their opinion on the veterans that are solidly on the anti-war side without ever examining the statistical evidence. Interesting.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/109654/Veterans-Solidly-Back-McCain.aspx
- Email this page
By Kill-WhiteySeptember 2, 2008 - 6:06pmIn other words
you choose to think for yourself. Or as some on the site would say, your a troll.LOL I don't support Obama, but I do like the man. I am no great fan of the Clinton's either, but I do give Bill his due. He was a masterful politician. I am not a strong supporter of "women's rights" but only because I believe in Human rights, and as such, I choose not to differentiate between man's rights and women's rights. Both genders should have the same rights, regardless of genitalia and other plumbing differences.
- Email this page
By momofukuSeptember 2, 2008 - 5:45pmLET ME POINT OUT
We have John McCain on record calling elected Representatives of the American public "shitheads" and "fuckers" ON THE SENATE FLOOR.
Then you have three professionals all saying exactly the same thing, something they witnessed.
I suspect they were telling the truth.
Bu Bye
- Email this page
By deanrddSeptember 2, 2008 - 4:53pmBy deanrddSeptember 2, 2008 - 5:53pm
People here call elected representatives that and considerably worse on a daily basis. So what's the problem? The fact that McCain can occassionally be a bit honest?
- Email this page
By Kill-WhiteySeptember 2, 2008 - 5:17pmObsession?
No, obsession is a fragrance. What I do with you is called "mockery". And it's lots of fun. Ans easy.
It's working, too.
Anal Giganticus - make that Anal Giganti-cuss.
"concern troll", REPUBLICAN, KvnRJohnson - 0 for 3. Congratulations - the trifecta.
Excuse me, I meant THE TRIFECTA of course.
A G, a legend in his own jammies.
- Email this page
By houndogSeptember 2, 2008 - 4:12pmThat film clip is AG's
That film clip is AG's favorite jerk off movie.
- Email this page
By bebeholmesSeptember 2, 2008 - 2:00pmThe only thing more perverted...
Is homelessbaby's jerkoff material...
Hey bebe, if you're driving that shit-smelling Ancient Mary rig of yours, keep your hands ON the wheel!
You don't have to burn books to destroy a culture. Just get people to stop reading them.
---Ray Bradbury
- Email this page
By LiberalIconoclastSeptember 2, 2008 - 6:13pmDamn libby, you and fu bush2 sure resemble
Bush and Cheney. No wonder your have such hatred in your heart for them. I bet people mistake you for them all the time, don't they?
- Email this page
By momofukuSeptember 2, 2008 - 6:21pmOoh, hatey has such wit!
I guess I'd better never be funny again!
Wanna-be little Mother Fucker. Isn't it time for your Clorox™ bath?
You don't have to burn books to destroy a culture. Just get people to stop reading them.
---Ray Bradbury
- Email this page
By LiberalIconoclastSeptember 2, 2008 - 6:26pmBy momofukuSeptember 2, 2008 - 7:21pm
You see there is no discussion here. You were banned multiple times.
You need to leave.
Nothing you say will distract us from Palin's book banning or membership in the Alaskan independence party...
- Email this page
By f u bush2September 2, 2008 - 6:35pmYou seem fairly well distracted in that photo.
By the way, Palin did not ban books. You are a liar when you say things like that.
- Email this page
By momofukuSeptember 2, 2008 - 7:13pmBy IlluminatiHottieSeptember 2, 2008 - 1:26pm
God you people love criminals.
I know how McCain and Palin can mobilize every republican voter. All they have to do is promise to out a CIA officer.
- Email this page
By f u bush2September 2, 2008 - 1:40pmNow I can see why repubs love her
She is in the same repressive, arrogant and vindictive mold as the rest of them. Don't like that person's opinion? Ban them. Won't bow down and kiss the great leader's feet and do their bidding? Fire them. Sarah Palin is the gift that keeps on giving and giving and giving.....
- Email this page
By UffdaguySeptember 2, 2008 - 12:27pmAs opposed to this beacon of enlightenment
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PMRC
- Email this page
By Kill-WhiteySeptember 2, 2008 - 12:45pmI didn't like that effort any better, because it doesn't matter
who wants to censor things....it's wrong no matter what. Those who want to censor things apparently have forgotten where we live. If they want to control all manner of speech and opinions, perhaps they'd feel more comfortable in China or North Korea.
- Email this page
By UffdaguySeptember 2, 2008 - 12:51pmBy UffdaguySeptember 2, 2008 - 1:51pm
Amen brother. You know what Larry Flynt says about it, you can't say you support free speech until you support the right of someone to say something that goes against everything you believe in. Now in that same vein, free speech and tasteless speech aren't always the same thing, however bad manners should be discouraged, not banned. But I agree, censorship is never good.
- Email this page
By Kill-WhiteySeptember 2, 2008 - 12:57pmAnd how many have you jumped on the "lets ban someone"
bandwagon. It's is you, fu 2, othello, AG, liberal iconoclast, etc, who are always calling for someone to be banned, because you people don't like the manner of speech and the opinions of others. You're such a hypocrite.
- Email this page
By momofukuSeptember 2, 2008 - 2:56pmBy momofukuSeptember 2, 2008 - 3:56pm
shut up hatey. you have no business here. You were banned MULTIPLE times.
- Email this page
By f u bush2September 2, 2008 - 2:58pmHypocrite
hypocrite, hypocrite, hypocrite.
- Email this page
By momofukuSeptember 2, 2008 - 3:16pmGet back to work, Uncle
Those McNuggets don't fry themselves!
You don't have to burn books to destroy a culture. Just get people to stop reading them.
---Ray Bradbury
- Email this page
By LiberalIconoclastSeptember 2, 2008 - 3:19pmBy momofukuSeptember 2, 2008 - 4:16pm
spammer spammer spammer
drop your spam bomb now and get it over with
- Email this page
By f u bush2September 2, 2008 - 3:21pmIf Palin Can't Control Her Own Daughter's Sex Habits
who the hell is she to tell other teens & women how to abstain from sex or what to do if they should become pregnant ? The only difference between Palin's daughter & the average teen that gets pregnant is Palin is going to foot her daughter's bills & support the baby. How many 18/17 yerar olds do you know of legally earn enough to money to support ababy & themselves ?
Palin's daughter would not even be an issue if republicans were not such hypocrites pretending they are the party of ethics, morals & values. The republicans stand on a soap-box & preach from the puplit then come off as the biggest hypocrites when one of their own is exposed in a scandal. The republicans should just admit they have gays, lesbians, bisexuals, abortions & corruption within their party just like everyone else. The stupid republican hypocrites are too stupid to admit they have flaws.
I suggest Sarah Palin, ( SHUT UP ! ) & clean up her own backyard before telling someone else how to live.
Watch the RNC convention tonight: Larry Craig, Jeff Gannon, Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, Limbaugh & Coulter are going to " TOE TAP in a bathroom stall & sing ( Y ) M C A ...!
- Email this page
By Buffy Duped GopSeptember 2, 2008 - 12:59pmI suppose all this means
I suppose all this means that you have control over your children's sex habits, huh. The real issue here is that her daughter, as opposed to liberal daughters, chose life for her child instead of the death you libs support for yours and other's babies.
- Email this page
By bebeholmesSeptember 2, 2008 - 1:59pmUh-oh
Looks like baby homer isn't on Rick Davis' email list. He said in an interview just this morning that this campaign is NOT about the issues!
I don't understand that approach, I really don't...it seems so self-destructive to the RepubliCANTs. Seriously. If he's trying to make this election "not about the issues", how can you and the other g0p sheeple-trolls make use of ANY Official Talking Points? They're all based on issues!
McCain/Palin '08: the also-rans.
- Email this page
By nonexistent manSeptember 2, 2008 - 2:06pmNo the real issue
is that you Republicans are hypocrites. This teenage pregnancy thing is so common among you fake christian, family values nutcases. You dont care about teen pregnancy or abortion when it happens to people like you. You dont care about abortion when black or brown people do it.
Why is the teen pregnancy rate so high among you inbred, right wing fake christians? Is it your lack of morals and values?
- Email this page
By hufflarry2000September 2, 2008 - 2:15pm?????
Was it the daughters choice, or was it palin , that made the choice for her. After all , it was palins career on the line. Or she could of gotten pregnant , not just from being horny, but saw it as a chance , to get out of that house, I bet living under the same roof , with her is not easy. The family smiles when they are outside, but what happens when the doors close.
- Email this page
By getmad54September 2, 2008 - 2:28pmSounds like your projecting your family life onto
others.
- Email this page
By momofukuSeptember 2, 2008 - 10:10pmdon't worry
Only someone whose life is in shambles would even think that. I really did not try to strike a nerve on you. But don't worry , once you hit bottom there no where else to go but up.
- Email this page
By getmad54September 2, 2008 - 11:26pmPeople might read more of your spam...
If you would learn the difference:
"Your" is the second person possessive, meaning "belonging to you." As in "Hatey, YOUR posts are all a bunch of bullshit spam."
"You're" is a contraction for "you are," as in "Hatey, YOU'RE a cowardly ignorant spammer."
Jesus H. Christ, I knew the difference in second grade.
You don't have to burn books to destroy a culture. Just get people to stop reading them.
---Ray Bradbury
- Email this page
By LiberalIconoclastSeptember 3, 2008 - 2:06amYou apperantly don't understand someone trying to live
a just and moral life. Just because someone fails to be perfect, at all times, does not make one a hypocrite, it makes them human. What you are saying is that Palin should have advocated pre-martial sex, and under age sex, to avoid being called a hypocrite. Try having some understanding instead of being so judgmental.
- Email this page
By momofukuSeptember 2, 2008 - 3:01pmNo, it is complete hypocrisy.
The Republicans call themselves the party of "family values". They try to say liberals have no family values. Then we find out all the perversion going on mostly among Republicans.
The "family values" of Republicans are molesting lil boys, bathroom gay sex, and taking drugs with gay hookers among other perversions.
The Republican motto is
Do as I say, not as I do.
- Email this page
By hufflarry2000September 2, 2008 - 3:14pmand on the other side
You know there is also someone else in this soap opera, thats the kid , if he is not 18 yrs old. That got palins daughter pregnant, I know you have heard of trooper gate, Just think how scared he must be in this shotgun wedding. Update : He is 18 yrs old , so if palin has any morals , she will have him put in jail. and registered as a sex offender.2:00 pm
- Email this page
By getmad54September 2, 2008 - 4:02pmThere are usually loopholes in those laws
A typical loophole in the "statutory rape" law allows for an affirmative defense if the difference in ages between the two is less than a certain amount; as an arbitrary example, if the girl is 16 and the man is 22, he can be charged with statutory rape, but if he's only 19, there's just three years' difference between the two, and the "statutory rape" charge gets thrown out.
He should have kept it in his pants; she should have held the aspirin between her knees. The parents of BOTH the kids should have been more strict and more observant in the kids' actions, and should never have left them unsupervised. But failing that, he should have had the brains to use a condom, or she should have looked into a diaphragm or pills, and so on and so on ad nauseam. It's very, very clear to all concerned that the "abstinence-only" approach does not and will never work, so it's time to clue kids into ALL the available options.
'Nuff said.
If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error. ~~~John Kenneth Galbraith
- Email this page
By nonexistent manSeptember 2, 2008 - 4:10pmI get so confused
I get so confused on the statutory rape laws, I'm glad you said loopholes, So if someone does not have the right lawyer, I'm going to assume that a 18 year old with a 17 year old , can still be charged with , statutory rape.
- Email this page
By getmad54September 2, 2008 - 4:51pmNope
Statutory rape only applies to an adult having sex with a minor. the law assumes that minor cannot give legal consent to an adult. You can imagine how complicated that would be with 2 minors. Technically, it would be stat rape from both sides.
Forcible rape, however, is completely another matter.
- Email this page
By houndogSeptember 2, 2008 - 4:58pmBy houndogSeptember 2, 2008 - 5:58pm
- Email this page
By f u bush2September 2, 2008 - 5:04pmAnother example
- Email this page
By f u bush2September 2, 2008 - 5:07pmBecause in Georgia
16 years old is the age of legal consent. I should have clarified that it all depends on what the definition of "minor" is - it is judged to be the legal age of consent, which is a state-specified age.
- Email this page
By houndogSeptember 2, 2008 - 5:14pmThe laws vary from state to state, re: age of consent
and difference's between ages. Most, if not all states do define a person under 13 or 14 years of age, sexually off limits. Unless the partner is roughly the same age. A sixteen year old and an eleven year old is pushing most states limits. As is a 12 vs 17. Some states allow consent between minors at 14, some don't allow consent at all. Most states do not press the issue if its consensual and the parties are 17/18.
- Email this page
By momofukuSeptember 2, 2008 - 5:34pmHatye seems to kow an awful lot about this
Been diddling those 14 year old boys again, Tío Tomás?
You don't have to burn books to destroy a culture. Just get people to stop reading them.
---Ray Bradbury
- Email this page
By LiberalIconoclastSeptember 2, 2008 - 6:27pm