Around the Web in 80 Seconds, 1.5.09

The fighting in Gaza is reportedly fierce and unprecedented with reports of massive Palestinian casualties and even rumored cluster bomb deployments.
Get ready to cheer and wait: A panel in Minnesota today will announce that Al Franken wins the Senate seat in that state. And by 225 votes no less!
President-elect Obama has arrived to Washington for a two-week hotel stay and gets to work on the stimulus package.
Did you hear the one about the Democrat president-elect and the $300 billion tax cut?
The Washington Post reports on Bush's last-minute push to pave Montana and other areas where trees tend to grow.
Asian stocks start the year with a roar.
Crooks and Liars Nicole Belle is not thrilled by news of Gov. Tim Kaine being the new DNC chair. Here's why.
Jonathan Singer at MyDD is not as critical about Kaine.
Alternet shows why the bailout is a big joke to the folks on the take.
Rahmbo attack? Reports are mumbled on Open Left that Bill Richardson's withdrawal from the commerce post was not as voluntary as reported.
Talk about making lemonade! The Christian Science Monitor sees the economic downturn as an opportunity to teach children about money.
Media Matters wants you to call NBC and let them know you're not okay with them helping Ann C@ulter sell her new b**k when it goes on sale January X.








Well...
Gaza... Nice ONE AA. When Hamas launches rockets into Israel from Gaza (targeting SCHOOLS and HOUSES) not a word. But when Israel swats the fly, "Oh, the HUMANITY....." Let's not forget who started this thing the MOMENT the cease fire ended. I'll give you it hint, it wasn't Israel.....
With Al Franken in there, the Senate is now officially the laughing stock that the Democrats - under Reid's leadership - have made it to be.
On Bill Richardson... Too bad, he seemed a good guy and one of the BEST the Dems had to offer...
Obama's tax cut??? WTF??? Barack O'Bush? Hmmmm, maybe raising taxes in a recession is NOT a good thing...HMMMMMMM?
WASHINGTON -- President-elect Barack Obama and congressional Democrats are crafting a plan to offer about $300 billion of tax cuts to individuals and businesses, a move aimed at attracting Republican support for an economic-stimulus package and prodding companies to create jobs.
The best part of an Obama Presidency is that Hillary will NEVER be President..
You could do your part
and refuse to take your taxpayer funded, socialist pension to help ease the tax burden, I am sure you will, right? Cutting taxes on the poor and middle class while raising them substantially on the wealthy always helps the economy.
By hufflarry2000January 5, 2009 - 7:53am
Dude, read the article... He plans on cutting them on businesses.....
Happy new year Huffy....
The best part of an Obama Presidency is that Hillary will NEVER be President..
Yes SMALL businesses you idiot.
Not multi billion dollar businesses, you ditto head dunce.
By hufflarry2000January 5, 2009 - 8:03am
Um, dude.. $250,000 profit isn't a multi-billion dollar business...
But I'll be honest, raising taxes on business profit to 39 from 34 is not a bad thing. It simply encourages those businesses to re-invest in the business, hire more employees or elect to pay the extra 5%.....
I have no issue tagging the multi-national corps, just leave the ones doing the right thing and staying here alone...
The best part of an Obama Presidency is that Hillary will NEVER be President..
What the hell are you talking about?
2/3 of corporations pay no tax at all. Dude??? What are you, in high school? When did I say $250,000 is a multi billion $ business? You make no sense.
By StillaFRightenedTwit January 5, 2009 - 6:59am
Obama's tax cut??? WTF??? Barack O'Bush? Hmmmm, maybe raising taxes in a recession is NOT a good thing...HMMMMMMM?
WASHINGTON -- President-elect Barack Obama and congressional Democrats are crafting a plan to offer about $300 billion of tax cuts to individuals and businesses, a move aimed at attracting Republican support for an economic-stimulus package and prodding companies to create jobs.
------------------------
A guy who said repeatedly throughout the primaries and general that he would cut taxes is actually going to follow through with cutting taxes? We actually have a President who is apparently going to do what he said on the campaign trail?
Ohz Noez! What are we to do?!
With Al Franken in there, the Senate is now officially the laughing stock that the Democrats - under Reid's leadership - have made it to be.
-------------------------
Wait.
The Senate wasn't officially made a laughing stock when a group of Grumpy Old Perverts rallied around a fellow Grumpy Old Pervert after he was found to be tapping toes in the tulips of toiletry?
Who knew?
But anyway...
Senator Al Franken
The seat of a Progressive Dem is returned to the hands of a Progressive Dem.
Wingnut heads everywhere must be exploding.
Methinks this might be the one that sends BillO over the cliff.
Gaza... Nice ONE AA. When Hamas launches rockets into Israel from Gaza (targeting SCHOOLS and HOUSES) not a word. But when Israel swats the fly, "Oh, the HUMANITY....." Let's not forget who started this thing the MOMENT the cease fire ended. I'll give you it hint, it wasn't Israel.....
-------------------------
Ruh-Roh. Is this the part where you start off on one of your bigoted, xenophobic diatribes that results in your ranking people on a religious scale, with Christians being better than Jews who are all obviously better than the murderous dessert-dwelling "Mudslimes"? Please spare us...
____________________
"It's all been satirized for your protection." --Maher
Blagorichardson.
From someone that always thought this guy was greatly overrated, it doesn't break my heart to post this news story.
http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2009/01/richardson_withdraws_as_commer.h...
Corruption doesn't belong to a particular party. It belongs to a particular arrogant, greedy, slimy mindset.
We need real and strict campaign finance reform. We need real and strict lobbyist reform.
Maybe Obama will do what he said the greedy, corrupt, slimy establishment politicians in Washington don't want to.
I don't give a shit if they don't want the real reform. This is the health of our democracy we are talking about.
By AntillectualJanuary 5, 2009 - 7:49am
We need real and strict campaign finance reform.
-Don't expect that from the candidate who opted out of public funding after he said he'd take it. Not to mention we don't know where a bunch of the money Obama got came from.
Corruption doesn't belong to a particular party. It belongs to a particular arrogant, greedy, slimy mindset.
-The most corrupt party is the party in power, no matter who they are at the time. When the Repubs were in charge there were plenty of Repub scandals. Now that the Dems rule the roost, times will a' change and we'll see them take the headlines...
-Spitzer
-Blago
-Edwards
-Richardson
Here we gooooooo!
The best part of an Obama Presidency is that Hillary will NEVER be President..
We dont know where money came from?
How much money? Do you have proof from the FEC?
By StillFightnJanuary 5, 2009 - 7:56am
-Spitzer
-Blago
-Edwards
-Richardson
Corrupt?
Well let's see here. Does sex = corruption? I don't think so. That cuts your list in half.
As for Richardson, I don't believe that he is guilty. I'm not saying that an investigtion shouldn't happen because of what I believe. I'm not a like the republican toadies. But I do believe Richardson will be found innocent and that he will join the Obama administration in the second term. Richardson is stepping away from the nomination to avoid hindering Obama with the trial.
We will see how the investigation shakes out,
but I have to think Richardson knew this investigation was occuriring when he accepted the nomination. I think he should have declined instead of giving the neocons more talking points and Obama another headache.
By AntillectualJanuary 5, 2009 - 8:50am
Well it's possible that Richardson might have thought it wouldn't make it this far and now that it has, he has stepped out of the nomination.
But I don't want to sound like I'm a republican toadie who defends democratic politicians with spin until the end. That is just how I feel about this. But certainly if the investigation has shown a trial should go forward to reveal the truth then it should happen.
I think
there must have been enough evidence to bring about this investigation. We will see how the investigation goes, but I don't have much confidence that there wasn't some extra-curricular activity here.
This is the crap we need to stop.
By twilight druid January 5, 2009 - 8:41am
Looks like that just leaves Twitty with Blago. I'll see his Blago, and raise him a Jacko.
____________________
"It's all been satirized for your protection." --Maher
By SJerseyIndy January 5, 2009 - 9:17am
LOL
Thanks for the links.
This is why
I say I will hold my judgement about Obama until I see how he actually governs.
As far as I know, Obama's campaign donations came predominantly from regular citizens, not corporations. I don't blame Obama for not limiting himself when it was clear the American people were ready to dish out donations to try change this country. He had to work within the current election finance set up and realized that very few Americans were willing to shell out donations to keep the same party in power. I don't blame him for this decision.
The question is whether or not he will honor the hundreds of thousands of campaign donations by coming through with the change he has promised. Pelosi has made it clear that unless Obama plays the usual bullshit game, that she plans to obstruct any serious reforms. I guarantee you she will fight campaign finance and lobbyist reform to the end, as most corporatist, multi-millionaire establishment politicians do.
You are correct that the party in the majority has the greatest opportunity for corruption. This is exactly because the same politicians set up a legalized bribery scheme to enrich themselves, and anti-American multi-national corporations, who make huge profits since they wrote the trade agenda, have plenty of money sitting around in their off shore accounts to buy the privilege of writing future legislation and dictating future trade policy.
To stop the cycle of corruption, we absolutely need real reforms, real penalties for violating the reforms and real campaign finance reform that removes the need to raise tens of millions to occupy a job that pays less than $200 K/year.
By StillaFRightenedTwit January 5, 2009 - 7:56am
Don't expect that from the candidate who opted out of public funding after he said he'd take it.
---------------------------------
Your interpretation of what was said does not what was said make.
It just makes you a really bad interpreter.
____________________
"It's all been satirized for your protection." --Maher
Grammar
President-elect Obama has arrived TO Washington ... ???
How about:
President-elect Obama has arrived IN Washington ...
How many people did Gaza kill with their little rockets?
Since the cease fire ended: zero
Congratulations Senator Franken
One less republican in the Senate thanks to you.
More fascism from Israel
1. They won't let reporters in to document the massacre in Gaza.
2. They are hunting for one reporter that disregarded Israel's crack down on the press
3. They will not let the Red Cross enter Gaza
Israel has
about 15 days of conquest left. They are taking as much land and killing as many muslims as they can between now and then.
They learned well from the Bush Regime and Hitler.
Israel rains fire on Gaza with phosphorus shells
The Geneva Treaty? Oh wait. We are talking about a government in /israel that is behaving similar to and is strong allies with the Bush regime in the US. Why would they care about treaties? The US no longer does. The uS and any allies are immune to treaties because they are basically the bullies on the block now.
So don't bother signing treaties with the US or Israel and believing they will honor it.
More Groups Than Thought Monitored in Police Spying
A long detailed article on this subject. More to read at the source.
The word of God,
according to Pat Robertson. I guess when God is not talking to Bush he spends the rest of his time talking to Robertson.
http://www.bostonherald.com/news/us_politics/view/2009_01_03_Pat_Roberts...
Regarding the notion of socialism, I am curious, when Jesus multiplied a few loaves of bread into many and changed water into "grape juice," how much did he charge the consumers?
When Jesus stayed in people's homes, how much rent did he pay?
When Jesus healed leprosy, was there a co-pay?
What did Jesus think of religious types that placed more emphasis on money than religion?
Jesus wasn't a government or
Jesus wasn't a government or a country. It really bothers me when libs try to drag Jesus into political debates, especially considering that they are usually the first to cry foul when religion comes up. "Oh, but you should be for federal redistribution of wealth, Jesus gave to the poor." Did Jesus trust the government to decide who should receive what he gave? Did he go to the king and ask him to distribute his generosity as he saw fit?
Sorry, but when I look at the federal government, I don't see Jesus. I don't look to the Washington for my salvation.
By evilconJanuary 5, 2009 - 11:06am
I thought he was the king
You look to Washington for everything in your whole life
Your job is created by the govt, your wages are paid for by tax dollars, your whole lifestyle is paid for by the govt and tax payers. You are a practicing socialist. Everything in your life depends on the govt.
Wonder of wonders, miracle of miracles...
Odd. Christians drag their religion into politics all the time. Gay rights, teaching mysticism in place of science.
I'm always skeptical about the "miracles" Jesus performed. Making someone who said they were blind suddenly "see". Making someone who said they couldn't walk suddenly "walk". Someone suddenly "waking up" from the dead. All these things, Binny Henn does every single performance PLUS, you get a slap to the forehead.
Now, if you really wanted a "miracle", you could "grow" a limb back. It wouldn't even have to be all at once. A little at a time would be cool. Now THAT'S a miracle I could believe in.
Too bad American Christians put their support behind Iraqi Christian genocide. Let's see, anti science, they hate their own gay children, they support Christian genocide in Iraq.
If there ever was a Jesus and he somehow magically came back today, beard, long hair, white moo moo and all, American Christians would certainly never accept him, especially if he looked like every other middle easterner.
I see these as spiritual
I see these as spiritual miracles, not physical ones. Jesus makes the man who is blind to the light of God see it again. The man who is a spiritual cripple is spiritually healed and can "walk" again. The man who is spiritually dead is brought back to spiritual life. The Bible is full of spiritual metaphors and allegories.
paleeeeeze
jesus drove an suv.
It can ALL be taken as metaphorical...
Particularly since (at the risk of offending bebe, which is no risk at all) Christianity is an Eastern religion. Not only because Israel is technically in Asia and if Jesus ever went to Europe, I never heard about it. But also for the larger reason that the parables, the similes and metaphors, and the entire culture that Jews at the time lived in, was essentially Asian. Roman influence was there, but clearly it hadn't replaced the Eastern sensibilities of first century Jews.
You don't have to burn books to destroy a culture. Just get people to stop reading them.
---Ray Bradbury
I appreciate the complement,
but at this point I can only claim to be an aspiring liberal.
As long as there are taxes, and the goverment spends them, by definition there is redistribution of wealth. The question is whether or not you think low income and middle wage earners' income should be redistributed to those that are already rich and don't need the extra income, or whether those that need the income should have their money sent to offshore accounts and hoarded by the rich, thus preventing it from being of any use to things like our infrastructure.
Jesus said that what you do to the least among us you do unto me. The Republicans have done some very bad things unto Jesus. Just look at our economy, our wages, our benefits, the torture, rendering, kidnapping, lying, stealing, etc.
You try to simplify this so you can ignore the reality. This is not about whether the rich should have their taxes returned to reasonable rates or not. This is about a mindset that favors the powerful and rich over the average and poor, even if this leads to an infinite degree of suffering upon the lesser among us. Robertson is rich and powerful. Who do you expect for to fend for? How many millionaires are going to argue for higher taxes for themselves? Shouldn't he be advocating for things that improve the lives of the most of his brothers and sisters instead of a select few? If Americans made better wages, wouldn't they be able to tithe more? Why would a Christian have any problem with a ruling entity being compassionate to their suffering citizenship as opposed to oppressing them and bringing tyranny to them?
My point is how much Robertson represents the antithesis to what Jesus was about. He is someone that has exploited Christianity to become rich and demonstrates how anti-Jesus-like he is by who he supports and what he advocates for and against.
Like it or not, the only chance the lesser among us have to preserve what rights and standard of living we have or hope to achieve is through a body bigger and more powerful than us as individual citizens, and bigger and more powerful than those who would otherwise oppress us and bring undue suffering on us.
When a government allows a special interest to oppress and swindle us, and this leads to a lot more suffering on our part and a lot more income for the oppressor than they would have had otherwise, it is incumbent upon that government to return that stolen wealth and use it to palliate the suffering they allowed to occur.
If Robertson thinks this is anything other than justice, if he thinks Jesus would have taught any differently, he is as full of shit as we already know he is.
Anquan Boldin
Pay the man!
Alright I've seen enough of this Burris guy
I knew nothing about this Burris guy that Blog appointed.
Now I see this:
"We are hoping and praying that they will not be able to deny what the Lord has ordained," - Roland Burris
We do not need any more of these religious freaks in Washington. And I do not mean people who are religious. I mean people who wear their religion on their sleeves and interject it into public debate like this.