OBAMA TO AMERICA: STUCK IN THE MIDDLE WITH YOU
In one of the most craftily sagacious moves in Barack Obama’s continuing exhibition of deftness as serious pol and spot-on Presidential contender and in a true triangulation gambit (can you say “Dick Morris”?), he’s tacking to the center thus reminding middle America and Harriet Heartland that “I’m a gun lovin’, God-fearin’, death penalty promotin’ sombitch. Yee haw.” Some progressives’ panties are not in a wad but a Gordian knot. Take it easy. Take a deep breath. He’s doing the right thing. You’re watching brilliance here. Let me ‘splain.
Barry 44 may bowl a measly 37 compared to Bush 43, but he’s dead-on with his bull’s-eye comments about guns. (Cue Eastwood in full squint: “Make my day.”) Time magazine reports that Obama was quoted as saying, "I have always believed that the Second Amendment protects the right of individuals to bear arms, but I also identify with the need for crime-ravaged communities to save their children from the violence that plagues our streets through common-sense, effective safety measures. The Supreme Court has now endorsed that view." (Cue Larry the Cable Guy: “Get-R-Done.”) Elitist, huh? Mr. Latte pansy, my butt. This is the new and improved Obama and some liberal psephological tyros are hiding under their bunk beds. Oh where, oh where has their Obama gone? Straight to the White House, baby. (Cue Lynyrd Skynyrd: “Sweet Home Alabama.”) Obama’s absolutely correct and for him to say anything else, and I mean anything else, would have been the death knell for him and his heretofore brilliant campaign. Come on, what’s so unreasonable about American citizens being able to have guns at their homes to protect themselves. Pilates against a home-invasion burglar won’t cut it, Tonto. (Cue theme from “The Good, the Bad and the Ugly.”)
And when it comes to the Supremes’ decision prohibiting the death penalty for individual crimes not involving the death of the victim, say, in CHILD RAPE?!, Barry proves he’s no Barry Manilow. Obama freaks some “effete elites” with this beaut: "I think that the rape of a small child, six or eight years old, is a heinous crime and if a state makes a decision that under narrow, limited, well-defined circumstances the death penalty is at least potentially applicable, that that does not violate our Constitution." Yee-ha! (Cue theme from “Death Wish IV.”) Remember Dukakis – no, not Olympia, but Michael – when he was asked whether he would support the idea of offing the hypothetical killer and rapist of HIS WIFE, repeat, HIS WIFE!, he said no. Next to being soft on wife killer-rapists, your wife’s killer-rapist, being tepid on the issue of child rapists makes wearing a funny tank helmet look like, well, wearing a funny tank helmet.
Now, the irony shouldn’t escape anyone here and certainly not Michelle’s old man: Every person exonerated from guilt so far and rescued from an eleventh hour visit with Old Sparky was tried and convicted under “narrow, limited, well-defined circumstances.” And for the most part were African-American and poor. So Barack, with all due respect, puh-leeze. Didn’t you work with inner-city Chicagoans and know something about unfairness and inequality, especially in criminal sentencing? But good for you, anyway. We know, we know; it had to be said. Poor McCain (oxymoron, anyone?), whilst walking around offering $300M for a new and improved Delco, dropping C-bombs on his C, and (rumored) yelling “Who ordered veal cutlet?” at inopportune moments, doesn’t know what to say. The hoary and haggard “flip-flopper” line is as ancient as Hanoi Hilton jokes, and, moreover, when America agrees with what Barack’s flip-flopped to, who cares?
But Holy Greg Palast, Batman! What’s happened to our Obama? Your Obama? No, America’s Obama. And that’s the point that many so-called “political junkies” are missing, and I’ve been saying this since the get-go, causing some bloggers and blogosphere commenters and denizens to dissolve and spiral into additional apoplexy. And while we’re at it, don’t expect B.O. to countenance gay marriages or flag burning any time soon. Expect more and bigger flag pins and a few visits to shooting ranges. No, he won’t start advocating a waterboarding ride at Six Flags, but what you’ll start to see is that beautiful and elegant tack to the center (OK, it’s aimed right, but center-bound) that is as old and axiomatic a move as McCain’s ____ (insert favorite McCain geezer joke here).
When middle America – a term, by the way, which doesn’t refer solely to corn pone sentimentalities, NASCAR, PBR and “Hee Haw” – is asked about what issues concern them, next to the obvious gas prices, the economy, health care, and the like, Joe Workboots worries about gun policies and the perception of a Pelosi-powered juggernaut sweeping down Main Street confiscating hearth-protection gats and hunting rifles. The anti-gun crowd, in their post-Brady (a true Reagan Republican) heyday, wanted to classify everything as an assault weapon – the greatest tautology since, well, “assault rifle.” This scared many immeasurably and gave incredible power and influence to the NRA.
President Obama (start getting used to it) may have gotten Maggie’s drawers with Reverend Wright, but he’s hit a two-tap tight pattern on his “courageous” views of decrying child rape and supporting the outrageous notion that millions of Americans can continue protecting their homes as they have since time immemorial.
McCain, the only candidate old enough to have actually served in a militia, continues on with what his staff swears is a lucid campaign.
- FILED UNDER: Host Posts
- June 27, 2008








Are you a straight liberal hypocrite like Lionel?
Dr. Martin Luther King had a name for those whites who supported the idea of black equality in words only. He called them white liberal hypocrites.
Today we have the straight liberal hypocrite, someone who says that gays deserve equality, but they are not willing to actually do anything about it. In fact, they believe stating this opinion openly or encouraging politicians to hold this opinion is election suicide.
Those of you who do not agree that Obama can win by doing the right thing need to read more King and Rustin. Maybe their courage will rub off on you. One can only hope.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XiNEhW1XQ9U
See the problem with this
We all know that it takes time to right an injustice. No matter how we feel about the decision over guns it took them over 70 years to have the guts to make it. Wwhere the firearm was a federal protection everyone yells state rights...where voting is a state protected right in the constitution it seems we selected Bush because it was taken away to protect oppressed white men of Florida.
Gay marriage will be here in 5 years. Oh there will be a few drag queens on steps and a parade in all the great gay places but do you know how middle America will find out? Lawyers...yes call 800 we will divorce you and save you from your past almost legal events in Vermont or get you out of that mistake in Canada from 8 years ago. Yes we will get more 1-800 than you can stand to swallow.
It is a new market to exploit do you think they are going to pass it up?
Do us all a favor?
Buchanan...if you have these feelings about Lionel, why the f*** don't you take your trolling ass elsewhere!?!??!?!?! You wan't some cheese with that miserable whine of yours?!?!?!? NO one wants to watch your clips and NO one wants to read your blithering bullshit!
::::walking out of the bloggosphere, slamming the door behind me:::::::
Great LionelLover
Michael Buchanan must stay up all day and night monitoring Lionel...he must have absolutely no life....so sad.
Lionel is SO GREAT and most of you people just don't get it...he is so damn entertaining and informing us all at the same time. I don't want to be bored and just hear how bad everything is...I want A little Tony Jo White thrown in.
Buchanan, go post your bullshit on someone's else's site.
What happened to your 'ignore him and he'll go away' policy?
And Lionel - you and Scalia want us to believe that all the residents of DC are members of a well-regualted militia? Oh, ok.
I guess all the residents of Chicago are too because their ban is next on the chopping block. I knew there was a good reason you don't practice law any longer.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XiNEhW1XQ9U
The militia thing is no
The militia thing is no longer applicable. This decision constitutes an INTERPRETATION of the Constitution in order to apply it to our present-day society. People already have guns illegally and use them against each other illegally.
That same level of malleable interpretation will be necessary if we want to get gay marriage up and running (which I do).
Read my blog entry, if you haven't. It's not the most brilliant thing since sliced bread, perhaps, but I think you might find some of it interesting. And it's only fair - we watch your videos!
Thanks,
Derm
No, the constitution doesn't need twisting
to allow citizens to participate in marriage.
The NAACP was never able to get an anti-lynching law passed, but yet we don't have lynchings anymore.
Attitudes are the only things that need changing for gays to be treated equally. Yours and Lionel's attitude is a good place to start since you have a platform to reach others.
Open your mind, a little is all I ask.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XiNEhW1XQ9U
Slow down, Michael. Don't
Slow down, Michael. Don't get carried away in thinking that you know what my personal attitudes are. Personally, I'm not sure my attitude could be any more pro-gay or pro-equality if I tried. Personal attitudes are not always the same as political realities, however. And that is not asking you to CLOSE your mind to what you believe is important, its only me saying that I don't really expect our society to leave up to my personal ideals.
Wish I did. For all of our sake.
But, but...
You're the one with the radio show! Why capitualte to political realities when you can say whatever you want? What is the fun in talking about political realities? When do we get to talk about the kind of country we want for ourselves?
It starts with the ones who can be heard. That would be you guys.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XiNEhW1XQ9U
I see your point entirely.
I see your point entirely. But I would argue that in talking about the political realities, we regularly refer to our ideals - Lionel has been clear that he wants Obama in, clear that he supports gay marriage and gay rights...As I have I in blog entries etc. I think that gets lost in the mix sometimes when people think we espousing right wing opinions or some such nonsense, when really we're lamenting the fact that in this country gay rights/marriage and the like are not necessarily attainable at this moment in time.
Also: I could be wrong. Who knows? Not me.
But my point is: I do think we talk about the kind of country we want. I just think we talk about it with a tinge of cynicism, as the country we want but might not be able to get. It's a shitty system we've set up here, and it comes nowhere near "by the people for the people".
A 'tinge' of cynicism?
Try a 'shower' of cynicism and you're a bit closer to the mark. But hey, its your show.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XiNEhW1XQ9U
Ha. When you're right,
Ha. When you're right, you're right.
That was me, Michael. How are you?
The Jaco Pastorius Experience
The mindset we Obama fans need to take. . .
between now and Election Day is that Barack has to say or do whatever it takes to WIN.
I've chosen to support Obama based on where he says he stands on energy, education, the war, civil liberties, health care, trade and many more issues. It may be naive (but I don't think I am) but I believe that the true Barack Obama is the one we learned about in the primary season and we'll see him again after Election Day. Between now and Election Day, however, he has to take on the persona of a winner. Candidate Obama may have to choose to de-emphasize some issues or shade his positions to emphasize the aspects that appeal to the middle. Sure, it's not totally honest, but it is pragmatic.
Obama: stuck in the middle
Politics is the art of the possible, and staying on top is like riding the river rapids; one is defined by how well and how many of the passengers make it to the end.
You talk rightly about perceptions of reality and I thought you might be interested in this article "Your Brain Lies to You at : http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/27/opinion/27aamodt.html?em&ex=1214712000...
You've got it backwards, Lionel
It's the ADULTS who care about policy, the Constitution, the make-up of the Supreme Court, etc.
It's the CHILDREN who care about lapel pins, bowling scores, gaffes, age, race, who might be a secret Muslim, who called his wife the C-word, gas tax holidays, etc.
The way you should put it is that the lefty, tree-hugger, Birkenstock liberals and the hard-hat, Archie Bnker conservatives are ADULTS who don't recognize that the election season is playtime for the CHILDREN. What you and I recognize is that we ADULTS need to frame our message for the CHILDREN because they are the most important citizens until November 4th. Then, the ADULTS take over and the CHILDREN go back to being irrelevant for the next three-and-a-half years.