MADDOW interviews Glenn Greenwald about Dems passing FISA
Listen: MADDOW interviews Glenn Greenwald about Dems passing FISA
Rachel Maddow talks to Salon's Glenn Greenwald about the incredible capitulation in the House today: Dems passed a bill extending the government's right to spy on you!
- FILED UNDER: FISA
- June 20, 2008








Where is the Glenn Greenwald interview? --
-- this links to the GI Bill story.
- Email this page
By JNagaryaJune 20, 2008 - 9:31pmI'd like to listen to Glenn Greenwald also
Where is the Glenn Greenwald segment? That's what I came here for.
- Email this page
By Junkyard DogJune 21, 2008 - 6:02amYou can get the podcast.
Second hour of the show.
AC
More liberal media at The Sideshow.
- Email this page
By AvedonJune 21, 2008 - 8:05pmObama - FISA - Bob Ruben?
Okay, remind me again why we don't like Rob/Bob Ruben? Treasury secretary under B Clinton, right? I thought Clinton did the economy right & we are just trying to get back to where we once belonged (as it were).
But my main point is that apparently Nobody paid attention to what an extremely moderate corporate-friendly democrat Obama is. They all just piled on to the change-wagon & now are surprised that he doesn't have the policies of Kucinich. Don't get me wrong. Obama is change & better all around than McBush, but he's not about to single-handedly usher in a utopian era of progressive economics. Maybe if he gets enough down-ticket progressive dems to push him that direction, but not on his own.
- Email this page
By zoomJune 21, 2008 - 9:59pmDid I miss something?
Have the Dem leadership decided that a bill from Bush raping the fourth amendment is like the weather?
They sure seem like they're trying to enjoy it.
Have they forgotten that they have a taser in their pocket?
It's called having the majority in both houses and being the party of the next president!
Show some backbone for once!
- Email this page
By ProgressiveinBerlinJune 22, 2008 - 1:02amProgressiveinBerlin, a couple of points
1. First off, I think that the Dems are reticent to fight both the immunity and FISA issues because they themselves were aware of many (if not all) of the programs when they were going on. PLUS I think that IF we begin to investigate these issues, we might just find that many of the Democrats are guilty of giving over our 4th Amendment rights to the Bush folks. I believe them to be just as culpable as the Republicans on this, which just may be the main reason WHY you don't find them fighting for US on this one.
2. I don't think they are enjoying it as much as frightened of revealing too much about their own participation in many of the active programs.
3. Why would the Democratic leadership suddenly decide to show some cojones in this matter when they have already proven themselves over and over again to be scared little children valuing their own careers over the good of their constituents?
================================================================
P.S.
Whereas I have left the Dem party this last year due to their collective ball-less behavior, I have been (and remain one in my heart) a staunch Democrat since I cast my very first vote. I simply cannot look to Party over our Constitution, political expediency over the nation's best interest or obfuscation over what is right for we, the people.
- Email this page
By Polly Tics (not verified)June 22, 2008 - 2:32pmRifreakindonkulus
I called my rep, Mark Udall, before the vote in the House. I had friends call. I blogged about it. He voted for it and let me down.
Today I called Obama urged by MoveOn to encourage voting no if retroactive immunity is left in. The question is, will the millions of dollars from the Telecom industry mean more than what is right?
Thanks for covering this Dr. Maddow. Thanks for the take on Harry Reid. You never fail to enlighten, encourage and entertain.
- Email this page
By dburanenJune 24, 2008 - 1:05amRachel, your political guru's too busy playing politics to see
what the REAL problem is w/Obama's stance on the FISA bill and his election chances. What is a recurring Right-Wing meme on Democrats, that keeps on sticking even as Bush looks more and more like the traitor and coward we all know he is? It's that "Dems are opportunistic and have no backbone, and will bend in ANY direction if they can see a momentary advantage in it" - which is exactly how Hoyer, Pelosi and the House Dems who voted for the FISA Capitulation look right now. It doesn't make them look principled or aware of anything other than (in the immortal words of William J. Lepetamine) "holdin' onto our phoney-baloney jobs!" - and sadly, Obama's "I'm opposed to the Telecom Immunity provision of this bill and will fight against it - but will vote for it anyway" looks like more of the same from the presumptive Democratic Presidential nominee.
The Repub's Master Strategy that gave them almost permanent control of Congress and the White House was to stand on NeoCon Christian Conservative "principle" over and over, come what may - win or lose, they KEPT voting against abortion and same-sex rights and checks on televangelists, and KEPT gaining adherents throughout the Seventies and Eighties. Even people who didn't necessarily agree w/the Repubs came to see them as "standing for something higher than themselves", while the Democrats tore themselves to shreds over what was perceived as niggling issues of political correctitude (just like the Jedi Knights in STAR WARS 1-3 did). That these issues were, in fact, fumbling attempts to ensure equitable treatment for ALL Americans got lost in the round-robin recriminations of WHO Has Historically Had it Worse, when the truth is everybody who's not a Rich White Guy have all had it really really bad at the Rich White Guys' hands!
I had hopes that Barack Obama would put a unilateral halt to this by his politics of principled pragmatism - of realizing that the world is a seriously flawed place, but it's up to ALL of us whether we whine about it...or do our damnedest to change that. Unfortunately, his position on this FISA bill makes him appear neither pragmatic nor principled, but desperate and pandering in the way Hillary Clinton's votes for the Iraq and (forthcoming) Iran War, and for The PATRIOT Act (twice!) made her look when she ran for President.
I believe, firmly, that Obama needs to vote against the FISA bill, because even if he loses the vote, even if most Americans are so terrified of the Ay-rab Boogeyman that they will cheerfully flush their civil liberties down the toilet and Question the Patriotism of anyone who reminds them that's exactly what they're doing, what they will remember come Election Day is "That Barack Obama, he's - got principles, don't he? Of course he's wrong - but still...he's got principles, unlike McCain who keeps flip-flopping Just Like Some Dem With No Backbone."
- Email this page
By drdarkenyJune 25, 2008 - 8:03pm