News:
Yesterday’s news that the NSA has amassed—with the help of major U.S. phone companies—a database tracking tens of millions of purely domestic American calls put the Bush White House back on the defensive, and raised new questions about the administration’s pick to head the CIA. Though Gen. Michael Hayden is still expected to be eventually confirmed, that process may now become a public forum on the legality of the domestic spying program, which Hayden oversaw in his time at the NSA's helm. Meanwhile, the White House’s legal argument has emerged, and seems to hinge on the notion that Americans consent to have their calls tracked by the government simply by establishing a telephone account.
WHO ARE THE NAZIS NOW?
every day is a new revelation with this bush bunch
Heir Bush and his administration are so bad that no matter how bad the next group of neo-cons are they will appear a thousand times better than the current regime. So I will give Bush's adversarys a break (at least for tonite) and suggest that being as that
music is my "thing" that we all get outthe guitars and sing this great little song to gether..(or at least dig the lyrics)
Who Are the Nazis? words and music by Bear Dyken
Old Tom Jefferson rolling in his grave
Rolling in his grave
Rolling in his grave
Old Tom Jefferson rolling in his grave
Tell me who are the Nazis now
(chorus)
Who are the Nazis
Who are the Nazis
Who are the Nazis now
Who are the Nazis
Who are the Nazis
Who are the Nazis now
They took Lady Liberty hold her in a cage
Hold her in a cage
Hold her in a cage
They took Lady Liberty hold her in a cage
Tell me who are the Nazis now
(chorus)
They took the Bill of Rights and stomped it to the ground
Stomped it to the ground
Stomped it to the ground
They took the Bill of Rights and stomped it to the ground
(chorus)
repeat 1st verse
(chorus)
if you want to hear the music just tune into this web location any monday night after 9:30 pm ....http:// www.homegrownradionj.com/ shows/ rough_draft_freeform_radi o_show.htm
I do not consent
to this criminal administration spying on me without the appropriate oversight. I am not a mind-numbed religious ditto head or a corrupt corporate entity. I represent a piece of the majority of Americans that expect any president to receive the appropriate judges's order based on the FISA law. Once he has adhered to the law and if a judge feels like the government spying on me is appropriate then so be it.
I in no way consent to the administration continuing their dangerous, secretive, anti-constitutional activity any more than I approved of Nixon doing it.
Treason
This violates the 4th Amendment to our Constitution. This violation of the Constitiution is an attack on our nation from within. That is treason. In war time, treason is punishable by death. Line 'em up!
i say you are correct!
It is treason!
Any one who could defend this administration and it's antics is in complicity with them.
Now is the time for all good American's left and right, Republican and Demorcrat, young and old to demand the Impeachment/ resignation of our Nazi president and his whole administration!
He violates the law with out concern, and demonstraits disrespect for law and ethics. Draw the line in the sand my fellow Americans...no further the 4th Reich must be made to pay for their crimes agianst America!
Sounds like a plan! :-D
Or send them to Guantanamo for "treatment". Maybe if they do some anal probing on Bush, they'll find his head.
I think your suggestion
is approperate! Send him and his general staff to Guantanamo for "treatment, as the administration are treasonists and terrorists of the most dangerous kind.
Bushes goverment should have it's self divested by congress of it's ability to wage war at once.
I'm a little nervous sleeping tonite knowing Adolph Bushes finger is on the bombs trigger, aren't you?
Thank Qwest
at least for either respecting our privacy or being fearful of law suits.
The polls are asking the wrong questions.
This isn't terror investigation versus right to privacy. This is whether you think the legislative branch should have to ability to extend executive privilege to mean that our president can ignore well established laws and do as he pleases in an unaccountable fashion.
We expect all three branches of our government to work together to protect us while upholding our nation's constitution. This is not as much about any specific amendment as it is protection of the constitution as a whole.
Of Course...
this is an attack on the Constitution as a whole. The 4th has been under attack, as has the 1st. They're just think they are being sly enough not to get rid of the whole thing in one fell swope. They'll whittle away at it slowey thinking that we don't notice. Surprise, you're on patriot camera!
To a certain extent, the ........
.......three branches are supposed to work together...that's the balance part. But they also are supposed to work against each other....that's the checks part. We now have an unchecked, imbalanced government.
"Liberalism is trust of the people tempered by prudence. Conservatism is distrust of the people tempered by fear."
William Gladstone, 4-time Prime Minister of Great Britain.
Above all else
The presidential oath of office has very simple set of requirements:
The Presidential Oath of Office
The oath to be taken by the president on first entering office is specified in Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution:
I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States
If this is the best of his ability to preserve, protect and defend the constitution of the United States from all enemies, foreign and domestic, he's even more stupid and incompetent than we believed.
If this is (as it sure as hell appears) the clear intent to establish an imperial presidency (kind of like Papa Doc Duvalier in Haiti), then it's a constitutional crisis that dwarfs Nixon's actions in the 1970's.
Historically, empires have ..........
........collapsed from the inside. I hope the current discontent with the PUD party signals the beginning of the end for G. Nero Bush.
We have to worry still, as we don't know what kind of fiddling he'll do as our Rome burns.
"Liberalism is trust of the people tempered by prudence. Conservatism is distrust of the people tempered by fear."
William Gladstone, 4-time Prime Minister of Great Britain.
Dave--Con sheeple don't get it!
Earth to con sheeple:
ALL "ELECTED" officials place hand on Bible to UPHOLD and DEFEND the U.S. Constitution! NOT VICE VERSA !!!!
NOT VICE VERSA !!!!!!! Cons, Get It? !!!!!!!
It
woundn't be bad if they were catching and
preventing the same amount of "terror" and
killing that is happening to the human
population of Iraq...WHO the hell can sift
through this amount of information? Do they
need a memo?
Phone records
I have nothing to hide, but this is a violation of the constitution. For all the good it does I have written my elected officials. This is one more little step in the negation of civil liberties.What will be revealed tommorow? Every day it's something else. One right after another is being taken away from us.Protest is only allowed in designated protest zones, where protesters cannot be seen by whomever is being protested against. Voting is not secure, as evidenced by the past two presidential "elections". Warrantless searches, Judge ordered psych exams for criticizing Bush. Where will it end?
Exactly......
......the government is required to assume EVERYONE has nothing to hide, unless they have "probable cause" to believe otherwise. Probable cause is narrowly defined in law. It's the investigative equivalent of "innocent until proven guilty".
"Liberalism is trust of the people tempered by prudence. Conservatism is distrust of the people tempered by fear."
William Gladstone, 4-time Prime Minister of Great Britain.
NOW you're worried?
For another day this is at the top of the news food chain, and it's no cooincidence that this all hit the news just before Hayden's confirmation hearings.
I perused the comments so far and have to wonder where the outrage was when the Senate, including Senators Kennedy and Leahy, voted in favor of a measure that would allow them to gain access to citizen's personal records for the purpose of figuring out who were possible contributers?
When a seemingly innocent couple just happened to listen in a private cell phone conversation involving a republican senator back in the '90's, and then give that information to leaders in the democratic party to be used, where was the outrage on the left?
And where was the concern when "Eschelon" was "outed", and it was found that there was not just data collection going on, but actual monitoring of phone calls and emails of citizens--without any warrants?
Before reacting so violently, who has stopped to ask whether or not the phone records are private? They are not. It does not require a warrant to access them.
Your information is bought and sold back and forth all the time. Your activity on the web is constantly monitored and assessed. If the government really wanted to dig into all our lives, they're laid out right there before them.
Stop and think about how easy identity theft is. Our lives are already open books, whether we like it or not, and most of us don't. But to blame it on Bush is one reason why the extreme left is often a laughing stock.
dcdrinda
Not quite dc
the major difference between Eschelon (which has existed for 2 decades) and this is that the NSA's monitoring activities under Eschelon were cleared through the FISA court. The Bush administration appears to consider itself completely immune to regulations regarding FISA and anything else it considers restrictive.
In addition to the obvious differences, the compilation of phone usage records by itself requires no warrant. You're right there. The use of those records cross-referenced against other databases, however does. The NSA program circumvents that requirement by keeping secret the presence of the records in the first place. While many have written to voice their concerns about apparent violations of the IV Amendment to the constitution, there are also concerns that the VI Amendment is also being circumvented. That amendment stipulates that an accused is entitled to confront his/her accuser. The maintenance of secret access files, absent any warrant violates that stricture. The FBI has used data mining for several investigations. Whenever they attempt to incorporate phone or internet usage patterns in the investigation of a potential criminal (in cases as disparate as child pornography trafficking and drug dealing)an attestation, affirming the relevance of the records to the investigation must be filed prior to the use of those data. Why would the NSA be any different?
In an ideal world, only terrorists or those suspected of terrorist activities would be subject to such surveillance. That a system for instigating such surveillance already exists and is disregarded, or circumvented should alarm anyone.
if you support the war
you should enlist
A curse upon the left and the right
but now is the time for all good Americans to rise above party intrests and IMPEACH the criminal in the White House.
I have spoke here time and time agian how the left and right are in cahoots. How men and women who belive in the precipts are betrayed by both parties time and time agian...how the members of both parties have been guilty of Treason....how Hillary and Biden both have supported carving up the Bill of Rights!
I also have called upon Americans to defend our liberty s and see the Traitors on both sides of the isle as the co-conspiriters they are.
Now I call upon you once agian to see through the window dressing.
Understand that their is a shell game going on...."let's not be fooled again!
Throw them all out....look for new leaders who will put principle above personal gain!
Most of us want to see the
Most of us want to see the criminals IMPEACHED. And yes, the left has sided with the right on several issues. But you seem to think that Dems have power. They don't; they have been relegated to the basement to have their little impeachment talks (and yes, they've met on the matter). And I think there are some Dems that are in cahoots as you say, Lieberwhine comes to mind. But I don't think Hillary and Biden are amongst them. I think they are just holding their cards close to the chest for the moment, and playing the game. At any rate, the Dems are our only way out. There is only one party that can beat the Repubs, and it is the Dems. The only other way would be for the people to rise up with arms and march on Washington.
A horrifying equation......
.......Bush + Impeachment = President Cheney.
......Cheney + Presidential Pressures = Myocardial Infarction + President Hastert.
Sorry, not for me.
"Liberalism is trust of the people tempered by prudence. Conservatism is distrust of the people tempered by fear."
William Gladstone, 4-time Prime Minister of Great Britain.
My impeachment includes
My impeachment includes Cheney and Rumsfeld:) Although, Cheney is already president - he just uses Bush to hide behind.
Well, impeachment doesn't
.......apply to Rumsfeld, as he isn't an elected official, but appointed.
Impeaching the top two execs. simultaneously would be very difficult and disruptive. And you still end up with President Hastert.
"Liberalism is trust of the people tempered by prudence. Conservatism is distrust of the people tempered by fear."
William Gladstone, 4-time Prime Minister of Great Britain.
Impeachment
Since the inpeaching Congress would be controlled by Democrats, wounn't we then have President Pelosi?
Nope, not with our ..........
........system. In Britain or Canada, yes. Here, no.
"Liberalism is trust of the people tempered by prudence. Conservatism is distrust of the people tempered by fear."
William Gladstone, 4-time Prime Minister of Great Britain.
Rock, don't mean to be pedantic--BUT....
...Impeachment is fancy word for "Accusation" that's all.
Impeachment would not = Cheney.
Clinton was impeached "accused" and "exonerated" at senate trial.
In other words ( for the cons) NOT GUILTY !!!!
Any schmuck can levy a frivolous "ACCUSATION" and call it an "IMPEACHMENT".
Bush would still need to be TRIED in the Senate!!
When cons bark, " Well, Clinton was IMPEACHED!"
I always respond, " and was ACQUITTED---NOT GUILTY!"
IMPEACH = diddly squat! Any schmuck can cast a bogus charge. A dime a dozen.
It's the VERDICT that counts!!!!
Cons think "Impeached"= Conviction! sorry cons, ya missed a step!
Still.....
.......it would backfire. It think it would be seen as a personal assault on Bush by many PUDS who might then rally to him, even if only half-heartedly.
It also dilutes our energies which really need to go into party building and expansion. In the end, we would have to have both houses of congress to succeed, but only one if all we are doing is a show trial, with no intent to convict. PUDS could rightly point out that it is such, and discount it's importance as just a political trick before the 08 elections.
And what if it ended up being successful, against everybody's expectations? Then we would have Cheney. EEEEEEK. Be careful what you wish for.
"Liberalism is trust of the people tempered by prudence. Conservatism is distrust of the people tempered by fear."
William Gladstone, 4-time Prime Minister of Great Britain.
No, I agree with you wholeheartedly!!!
I just hope Dems get at least one chamber back just to investigate their ass and dog 'em all the way to Nov. '08!
Just Investigate,Investigate,.....and sit back and watch Tony Snow dance & dance and self-destrct ...
Buwaaaaaaa haaaaa haaaaaaa.......
Tony gonna be sorry he took that job on the last leg!!
Tony,Tony--- baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaad timing!!!
bush wants the nsa thing
in the corporate media because most americans agree with bush on this. that is because most americans don't even know what the fourth amendment says.
The poll that showed
The poll that showed Americans supporting this was skewed by the way the question was asked. It's like the old "are you still beating on your wife" question. There is no way to answer it with yes or no.
"And Saint Attila raised the hand grenade up on high, saying, 'O Lord, bless this thy hand grenade, that with it thou mayst blow thine enemies to tiny bits, in thy mercy.'" --Monty Python and The Holy Grail
dems did it
so repubs can do it. third grade.
This is an easy one.
[["it's no cooincidence that this all hit the news just before Hayden's confirmation hearings."]]
Your opinion. Prove it.
[[where the outrage was when the Senate, including Senators Kennedy and Leahy, voted in favor of a measure that would allow them to gain access to citizen's personal records for the purpose of figuring out who were possible contributers?"]]
You don't like the laws that require disclosure of political contributions? TOUGH... Now, when you buy elections, you can no longer do it SECRETLY, Sorry! BTW, out-spending the opposition with millions in attack ads is not free speech. It is a PERVERSION of free speech and spits in the face of the notion of "one man, one vote". Our Republic WILL NOT SURVIVE unless we get special interest money out of politics and put the interests of the people back in.
We, the people OWN THE AIRWAVES. Liscensure should require broadcast media outlets to provide time to all recognized candidates... PERIOD. If it cuts into there profits, tough shit. They're OUR airwaves, not theirs.
[[When a seemingly innocent couple just happened to listen in a private cell phone conversation involving a republican senator back in the '90's, and then give that information to leaders in the democratic party to be used, where was the outrage on the left?"]]
I AM outraged! That's wiretapping. If it was done without a court order, the purpetrators should be prosecuted. Don't you agree?
[["And where was the concern when "Eschelon" was "outed", and it was found that there was not just data collection going on, but actual monitoring of phone calls and emails of citizens--without any warrants?"]]
Thanks for the heads up. I'm shocked. I had no idea we had gone this far...
WHY THE HELL WEREN'T YOU PEOPLE MAKING A STINK ABOUT THIS INSTEAD OF FOCUSING ON CLINTON'S TROUSER TROUT?! IT WAS YOUR JOB TO PROVIDE A "CHECK" ON CLINTON'S POWERS BUT YOU BLEW IT BECAUSE YOU WERE OBSESSED WITH HIS LYING ABOUT CHEATING ON HIS WIFE.
Hey people! Read this. I guarentee, you'll shit your pants.
http://fly.hiwaay.net/~pspoole/echelon.html
As to the rest. There are ways to stay out of the data bases and prevent your life being "an open book". Mine isn't. starting with my Qwest phone service. Also anti-spyware, deleting cookies etc. Hell, I won't even use a supermarket "discount card". I always insist they run a "store card" and I don't give a damn how long it takes them. They must, by law, comply. It's none of anybody's business how much hemorrhoid creme I use (none, thankfully).
Have a Happy
A G
Amen brother! It's OUR airwaves!! tough shit if they lose $$$
Amen brother! It's OUR airwaves!! tough shit if they lose $$$
My View
It makes me sick to see you fight amongst each other over
a program which is designed to protect your country. I understand your
concerns but they are blown way out of proportion, especially having learnt that domestic surveillance didn't involve listening on any conversation. Just a database of call origination and termination.
The oversight committee you guys are screaming for will not be made of you folks it will be again gov. bureaucrats who after spending millions will not conclude anything. Submit a useless report and will cause the death of the program. You guys will go back to living your silly day-to-day lives and one day america will be hit again.
You guys will be back again screaming why gov. did nothing and a new 911 commission will probably conclude it could have been prevented if there was some form of surveillance.
Sadly for you guys, this time there will be no Mr. Bush
You have no idea what you're
You have no idea what you're saying that might be misinterpreted. You'd better watch every word. Heck, you might someday be criticizing a terrorist and someone will think you're just trying to cover up a terrorist conspiracy in your own home! And that name, Cleopatra, heck, it sounds pretty Middle Eastern to me. Maybe just by using an Egyptian name you are now a target!
I have no such fear
I don't mind if someone comes knocking on my door to check me out.. In fact they might even offer me a job once they hear my views.
cleo has no fear of fascism
cleo, post your bank account number here then?
many said the same thing before the nazis came to their doors
I don't mind if someone comes knocking on my door to check me out.. In fact they might even offer me a job once they hear my views.
You Just Don't Get It.
Are you so without imagination that you don't realize that the knock on the door may be President Hillary Clinton and NSA Chief Micheal Moore?!
Yes, now that they will have listened to your views (in your private e-mail and telephone communications) they may indeed offer you a cubicle... BUT IT WILL HAVE BARS ON IT.
The constitution is there TO PROTECT US ALL, including the dimwitted.
I am incredulous that those who willingly give up there liberty and freely join the march toward tyranny can't understand that the unbridled power they seek MAY SOON BE USED AGAINST THEMSELVES.
WISE UP CONTARDS.
Have a Happy
A G
AG--Precisely!!! But it fits, think about it......
The same sheeple as a laissez-faire moron.
"in order to make a profit, cons would sell the noose to hang themselves with"
Blind greed & ignorance!!
An opinion from CNN that
An opinion from CNN that says it pretty well:
The issue is not whether or not the government should monitor domestic telephone call records. The issue is whether or not the Executive branch should be able to do this without oversight. One of the major elements of the Constitution is the system of checks and balances. To say the Executive branch can do whatever it deems necessary, in secrecy and without oversight by the other two branches of government, seems a mockery of not only the words, but also the spirit of the Constitution. The Framers were well aware of consequences of an unchecked and unquestioned executive (another George, in fact, King George III). We, apparently, have forgotten.
K. Kono, Boston, Massachusetts
Cleo, I keep wondering what country you are from - could it be Israel? That's about the only country that I think could be supporting the US by now. Or may-be Saudi Arabia?
I don't mind the administration looking
and legally obtaining information ,. I resent their improper and ilegal methods of subverting the constitution.
IMPEACH THE 4th REICH!
Take one more guess
Cleo, I keep wondering what country you are from - could it be Israel? That's about the only country that I think could be supporting the US by now. Or may-be Saudi Arabia?
I don't blame you, this is what I would think too, if I watch CNN who preach to the choir. Much like this website. In fact, they think for you. There is not widespread hatred of US around the world as you are led to believe.
It hurt's you, isn't it? to see someone having a different view than your own, and you call yourselves a liberal.
You're an American con.
You're an American con. You're only pretending to be from another country.
"And Saint Attila raised the hand grenade up on high, saying, 'O Lord, bless this thy hand grenade, that with it thou mayst blow thine enemies to tiny bits, in thy mercy.'" --Monty Python and The Holy Grail
Upset
It upsets you, isn't it?, to see a foreigner defending US. How is working for CAIR? Do they pay you well Michtou Mohammed?.
When you pretend to be a
When you pretend to be a foreigner, your English gets worse. But as a language teacher, I can spot people who are pretending to speak English badly.
You're a freaking fake.
"And Saint Attila raised the hand grenade up on high, saying, 'O Lord, bless this thy hand grenade, that with it thou mayst blow thine enemies to tiny bits, in thy mercy.'" --Monty Python and The Holy Grail
About CAIR
http://www.anti-cair-net.org/
"Liberalism is trust of the people tempered by prudence. Conservatism is distrust of the people tempered by fear."
William Gladstone, 4-time Prime Minister of Great Britain.
repubs call us mohammed
because we use our freedom and democracy.
Hmm.
Like Mohammed you mean?
Sorry, in the last year,
Sorry, in the last year, I've been to Switzerland and Canada - both places I needed to apologize for my government. You could see the contempt in some people's eyes.
BTW, CNN is not a liberal station, nor is the New York Times a liberal rag - if it were it would have run that article about the NSA wiretaps a year ago (when it first came upon the info) - BEFORE THE ELECTION.
Change..
Sorry, in the last year, I've been to Switzerland and Canada - both places I needed to apologize for my government. You could see the contempt in some people's eyes.
It's time to change your friends. You are in wrong company.
BTW, CNN is not a liberal station, nor is the New York Times a liberal rag - if it were it would have run that article about the NSA wiretaps a year ago (when it first came upon the info) - BEFORE THE ELECTION.
I have no problem if CNN and NY Times were truly liberal, instead they are just biased.
Staggering depth of bullshit.
cleo, just when I think you couldn't possibly lie more YOU COME UP WITH FRESH LIES!
The anti-American sentiment overseas (which I have seen first-hand) ranges from simple disdain to abject loathing. Even on a perssonal level we are considered to be arrogant, overbearing, poorly dressed, and bad-mannered. Those are the facts. That's not MY opnion. That's what THEY say overtly. You are either ignorant of this truth or you are puposefully lying.
The view that CNN and The New York Times are liberal outlets is just bullshit. Anyone that simply "reports" rather than acting as a right-wing propoganda outlet is labeled "liberal". It's all bullshit, but you're entitled to your bullshit opinion.
ARE YOU IGNORANT of the fact that The New York Times sat on the story BECAUSE THE ADMINISTRATION ASKED THEM TO, and as good citizens, agreed?... OR IS IT AN INTENTIONAL LIE? Wasn't it The New York Times that broke the "Whitewater" scandal? Explain that.
And are you suggesting NYT contributors like David Brooks, William Safire, John Tierney, and Robert Novak ARE LIBERALS?
I hope not... That would be 'contarded'.
You're not fooling anyone.
Have a Happy
A G
Jealous
You will see the same people lined up in US embassies all over the world
hoping to win a Green Card. May be in your own mind you see america as
inferior to those countries. I am foreigner and I understand one
american weakness, an american becomes defensive and weak if we blame
their country. Every foreigner understands this and they exploit this weakness. This is similar to why a black would call some white a racist
Bugiarda. Menteuse.
Bugiarda. Menteuse. Mentirosa. Dorough-gou.
"And Saint Attila raised the hand grenade up on high, saying, 'O Lord, bless this thy hand grenade, that with it thou mayst blow thine enemies to tiny bits, in thy mercy.'" --Monty Python and The Holy Grail
Menu
Taco, burrito, enchillada, chalupa - Taco Bell's menu
Which menu is yours?
HEY, NON-AMERICAN.
YOU HAVEN'T ANSWERED ANY OF MY QUESTIONS.
Let's recap:
1) ARE YOU IGNORANT of the fact that The New York Times sat on the [NSA domestic spying] story BECAUSE THE ADMINISTRATION ASKED THEM TO ?
2) And are you suggesting NYT contributors like David Brooks, William Safire, John Tierney, and Robert Novak ARE LIBERALS?
We're all anxiously awaiting your answers... contard.
Have a Happy
A G
If you really WERE a
If you really WERE a foreigner, you would have picked up on at least ONE of those words. You're an American, and an F*ING liar on top of it all.
"And Saint Attila raised the hand grenade up on high, saying, 'O Lord, bless this thy hand grenade, that with it thou mayst blow thine enemies to tiny bits, in thy mercy.'" --Monty Python and The Holy Grail
'couple things.
'couple things.
First "may be" is one word.
Second, I don't see the U.S. as inferior. On the contrary, I am hopeful we are SO strong and resilient we may just survive THE WORST ADMINISTRATION IN HISTORY... that's double-tough. Good for us. But that depends entirely on our willingness to defend our constitution from people LIKE YOU.
Further, you entirely miss the point about your perceived "American weakness". It is NOT myself I am ashamed of, for that matter, it is not Americans like ME that foreigners find offensive. It is Americans with attitudes like YOURS.
We've had friends before and we'll have friends again BUT NO ONE IS GOING TO COOPERATE WITH US AS LONG AS PRESIDENT JACK-ASS LEADS US.
Have a Happy
A G
Don't forget
"It is not Americans like ME that foreigners find offensive. It is Americans with attitudes like YOURS."
I am not an american.
Reading Comprehension 101
HEY, CONTARD!...
TRY AGAIN, CONTARD!
[["It is not Americans like ME that foreigners find offensive. It is Americans with attitudes like YOURS."]]
Now please show the class where I said you are an American.
DUH!
You're a moron. Just a big NON-AMERICAN moron.
Have a Happy
A G
Oversight
No you didn't, my oversight.
people come here
for the money and so we don't bomb them.
cleo says
america is perfect and racism doesn't exist.
What?
Don't try to put words in my mouth while I try to put sense in your brain
You have to HAVE.......
.......sense before you can COMMUNICATE sensibly. You have exhibited none, and no interest in dealing with concepts or data...just a point and shoot line or paragraph or two, with little to no content, no concepts laid out, no principles espoused. Just sameo-lameo PUD/CON drivel. You are not even up to the level of, say, JPN, and that is a pretty low bar to reach.
"Liberalism is trust of the people tempered by prudence. Conservatism is distrust of the people tempered by fear."
William Gladstone, 4-time Prime Minister of Great Britain.
I didn't know
I didn't know you are the ultimate authority to evaluate
and rate members of this site. What do I have to do reach your level, just agree everything you say?
Well, in a democracy.......
.....liberally applied, we are ALL the arbiters of our reality, that is what we here in America call "freedom". Freedom to analyse, to judge, to decide, and to discuss. After analyzing your drivel, I have judged you to be of very low caliber in reference to our discussions here, decided to tell everyone about my judgement, and am now engaged in the freedom to discuss the issue.
Welcome to America.
"Liberalism is trust of the people tempered by prudence. Conservatism is distrust of the people tempered by fear."
William Gladstone, 4-time Prime Minister of Great Britain.
Helpful
I applied the same principles and judged you as a person who has lot of
information but a poor ability to analyse and process this information and arrive at a correct logical conclusion. The common theme in all your posts is paranoia.
It's not paranoia...........
.......if people (PUDS/NEOCONS) REALLY are out to get you.
"The common theme in all your posts is paranoia."
So if I can produce ONE or my previous posts that is upbeat and hopeful, UN-paraniod, your contention is shit, right?
Oh, by the way...your "foreignness" just disappeared again, and your spelling is impeccable, may I say.
"Liberalism is trust of the people tempered by prudence. Conservatism is distrust of the people tempered by fear."
William Gladstone, 4-time Prime Minister of Great Britain.
you put the words in your own mouth
"I am foreigner and I understand one
american weakness, an american becomes defensive and weak if we blame
their country. Every foreigner understands this and they exploit this weakness. This is similar to why a black would call some white a racist
TRANSLATION: SO AMERICA'S ONLY WEAKNESS IS LISTENING TO IT'S CRITICS. AND WEHEN BLACKS TALK ABOUT RACISM IN AMERICA IT IS MERELY A TRICK BECAUSE THERE IS NO RACISM IN AMERICA.
BOIL IT DOWN, BREAK IT DOWN: AMERICA IS PERFECT AND RACISM DOESN'T EXIST IN AMERICA.
repubs say
it depends on the definition of their words.
And in what company should I
And in what company should I keep?
BTW, I mainly watch C-Span and PBS, sometimes NBC and CBS (though CBS sold out to corporate media). I'll even tune into Faux News to see how they're spinning things. I 'loved' the piece on a serial rapist in Florida - while talking about such a grave subject, they showed clips of Spring Break - girls dancing around in bikinis and such. It was halarious!
And I bet you ran out and bought a case of duct tape after 9-11 - what a hoot! May-be if you'd read your history books, you'd realize that terror and religion have been used throughout history to control the masses. What Bush and Co. are doing is the oldest trick in the book. Just think of the medicine man in an Indian tribe. The tribe leader goes to the mm and says I need to stir up the people to convince them to attack this other tribe. The medicine man does his little dance and conjures up the spirits. The 'spirits' tell the mm and tribe they need to attack this tribe, or suffer some great loss, or pain, or death.
The fact that you still believe the BS coming out of this Administration is because you are a coward. You've been terrorized into believing the medicine man. If this Administration is so wonderful, why is Osama Bin Laden still on the loose? Why did we let him go in Tora Bora? Why does your 'great white leader' now say "I don't spend much time on OBL".
You seem to think we at AAR are just sore losers. That it's just politics as usual. It's much more than that - we are ALARMED! We see the direction this Administration is taking us into, and we can no longer be quiet and do nothing. One day you will wake up and realize we were right. But hopefully we can turn things around before it is too late - for me, you, the rest of this country and the world.
Reply
I didn't see much TV for last few years. Don't have one at home. Don't
know what's on nowadays on the networks you mentioned. PBS, C-SPAN & Court TV are good. I feel
Fox news is biased towards republicans
Rush Limbaugh is not very interesting just like hosts on AAR like
Al Frankstein believes every small thing is a conspiracy
Shawn Hannity - Although a good man is very childish and opinionated
Republican Women Laura Ingram, Monica CrawLey - Sensible
Lionell - Acceptable
Hosts of AAR - Detached from reality
To answer your question, you should avoid the company
of anyone who equates President Bush with hitler or calls this gov. fascist or Nazi.
You ask why is Osama Bin Laden still on the loose?
Many muslims around the world see him as their leader and will do
anything to protect him. He could be hiding in a mosque
in US and no muslim will turn him in.
Why did we let him go in Tora Bora?
You seem to suggest US had him and then let him go. It is just that
he got lucky and escaped. If you don't agree, I would like to hear what you think happened
I don't agree.
With Rumsfeld and the neo-cons at the healm, Bin Laden didn't need much luck. He was able to slip through Rumsfeld's fingers as easily as he was able to goad President Jack-Ass into a global jihad, thus giving Bin Laden exactly what he wanted.
Rumsfeld's slavish adherence to his remarkably simple-minded and naive concept of "war on-the-cheap" led him to hire locals to do a job that should have been done BY ABOUT 150,OOO U.S. TROOPS INCLUDING THE ENTIRE GODDAMNED 10TH MOUNTAIN DIVISION.
Guess What. Any loyalty you can buy with gold... someone else can buy with more gold. Bin Laden more than likely just greased the right palms and walked right out.
Heck of a job, Rummy.
Have a Happy
A G
It's even simpler and.......
........obl is dead. Never needed to leave Tora Bora, because he died not too long after the Taliban were ousted in Afghanistan. The Al Quaeda know it, our administration knows it, (may even have found his body), but the Al Q. won't say anything, as he is still a good recruiter for them, and has moved into mythic status, and the Administration has him as the boogeyman. "He's out there somewhere, ploting and planning to attack, we have to gut all our social programs, research and development, and infrastructure to keep freedom on the march". Shibai. You haven't SEEN bin Laden for a very good reason....they trotted out a video of obl meeting some of his buds and it was obviously an impostor. The guy was right handed, obl is a lefty....the guy had a much fuller face and different nose, and he was wearing a watch and a gold ring...verboten by obl's religious strictures. It was such a bomb that they never tried it again. That he is dead and that Bush knows it is why Bush would say that he just doesn't spend that much time on him. Of course not.
"Liberalism is trust of the people tempered by prudence. Conservatism is distrust of the people tempered by fear."
William Gladstone, 4-time Prime Minister of Great Britain.
So the Swiss and Canadians
So the Swiss and Canadians think Bush is a Nazi? Seems like the list is growing. Maybe people around the world don't take kindly to the US pre-emptively starting a war and occupying another country.
I get it - you're an illegal immigrant from Mexico that needs a green card. You came to the US because your country had already been exploited by corporations and the pickings were better here. You have yet to discover that you are being exploited here as well. You're happy, though, and LOVE America because you are doing so much better. You get paid cash under the table and do not have to pay taxes. You just can't understand why we don't love and support our government. And what you really don't understand is that we see our country becoming like yours, and want to STOP it.
OK Cleo, you asked for it....
"Why did we let him (Osama bin-Laden) go in Tora Bora? You seem to suggest US had him and then let him go. It is just that he got lucky and escaped. If you don't agree, I would like to hear what you think happened"
OK: But first, a word from our sponsor.
Cleo, not only are you a shill, you're not even a particularly good one. In your earlier posts, you suggested we'd rue all the horrid things we said about Bush, because we'll get hit again.
You went on to suggest that we feel bad because someone is disagreeing with us, (and we call ourselves liberal! Shame on us!)I, for one, don't mind disagreement, as long as the opposing viewpoint is an informed one. That means something that can be substantiated, not the Gospel according to Hannity (who is NOT a good man, he's a self-righteous creep from Long Island who likes to think he's more intelligent than he is) or O'Reilly (who doesn't deserve the file space it takes to insult him. He's beneath contempt). It means something that can be documented and relies on fact, not innuendo.
To help your journey toward reality, here's a little chronology, that includes the answer to What Happened at Tora Bora. After, there are a few questions for you.
1992: George H.W. Bush negotiates permanent U.S. military and support resources in Saudi Arabia. Many middle-eastern leaders, including some who were allied with us in the first Gulf War (notably Haffez el-Assad of Syria and Mubarik of Egypt) cautioned against the insertion of U.S. military in Saudi Arabia during peacetime, for fear it would lend the appearance of occupation.
1993: Osama bin-Laden, related to the Saudi royal family, denounces King Fahd, Crown Prince Abdullah and other members of the Saudi royalty who approved the U.S. base treaty. bin Laden moves to Sudan, where he issues a fatwa against the "Crusaders and infidels" who occupy the area around Medina and other holy sites in Saudi Arabia.
1993, January 20: Bill Clinton takes office
1993, February 26: 37 days into his presidency, the first attack on the World Trade Center occurs. Though the plan had been formulated for over a year, Clinton does NOT blame his predecessor. Instead, he mobilizes a multi-national, multi-service task force, headed by John O'Neil, an FBI counter-terrorism specialist, to identify, track down and apprehend the culprits (which they do, thanks to solid investigative work and the stupidity of some of the terrorists).
1994: Ramzi Yusef, mastermind of the W.T.C. attack is apprehended.
1999: Customs intercepts a van crossing the Canadian border into Washington state. The Millenium Plot is broken, and the planned attack on LAX never occurs. Clinton convenes a special national security meeting on a weekly basis to review intelligence on al-Queda and other related terrorist activity.
2000: Bush claims victory, after the Supreme Court requires the Florida recount to cease.
2001, January 20: Shrubco takes office. Sandy Berger, Clinton's National Security Advisor informs his incoming counterpart, Condoleezza Rice, that her greatest concern will be al-Queda, bin-Laden and the porous border between Afghanistan and Pakistan, permitting the free passage of terrorists and material from training sites in Taliban controlled Afghanistan to Pakistan, and thence across the world.
2001, January 28: Shrubco holds their first National Security Council meeting. Agenda: Iraq and how to depose Saddam Hussein. No mention is made of al-Queda or Osama bin-Laden
2001, February: John O'Neil, in Yemen investigating al-Queda links to terrorism is recalled to the U.S. after the American ambassador objects to O'Neil's accusation of Yemeni complicity in terrorist activity (notably the bombing of the U.S.S. Cole).
2001, March: O'Neil is reprimanded for leaving a personal computer unattended at a secure meeting. He subsequently retires from the Bureau.
2001, June: The Phoenix Arizona field office of the FBI inquires about any suspicious activities involving middle-eastern individuals interested in flight training.
2001, July: The Minneapolis field office of the FBI arrests Zacharias Moussouai. An effort to obtain a warrant to open the files on his computer fails, and the warrant is not issued.
2001, July: Outgoing FBI director Louis Freeh informs Attorney General John Ashcroft of concerns regarding a possible run-up to a terrorist strike in the U.S. involving hijacked commercial airliners. Ashcroft tells Freeh the chief priority of the Justice Department is drug trafficking. He recommends Freeh bring his concerns to the INS.
2001, August 6: George Tenet provides the Presidential Daily Briefing, entitled: Bin-Laden Determined to Strike in U.S. Shrub appears to listen, then does nothing (unless you count falling off his bicycle and moving tumbleweeds as doing something).
2001, September 5: John O'Neil assumes his new post as Director of Security for the World Trade Center, which he has long predicted will be the focus of any new terrorist attacks within the U.S.
2001, September 10: NSA intercepts three messages that might have to do with the forthcoming attacks. That still isn't definitive, however, it doesn't matter, because they stay in an in-tray and don't get translated until September 12.
2001, September 11: George H.W. Bush has breakfast with members of the bin-Laden family, in conjunction with his activities for the Carlyle Group. His eldest son sits immobile in an elementary school classroom where the class is reading "My Pet Goat", after W.H. Chief of Staff Andrew Card informed Shrub, "Sir, we are under attack. New York has been hit". John O'Neil, and about 2800 others die in the attack in New York. Others die at the Pentagon, and in western PA, where United Flight 93 crashed, apparently en route to the Capitol building.
Shrub then invokes the ghosts of those killed as a justification for invading Iraq. Oh, you wanted to know about what happened with Osama at Tora Bora? Elements of the 10th Mountain Division and the 82nd Airborne Division engaged Taliban fighters at and around Tora Bora. Intelligence indicated not only that bin-Laden was situated with the beseiged fighters, but was physically ill.
At the direction of Tommy Franks (Bush supporter extrordinaire), that the U.S. units hold back and that the final push to rout the fighters at Tora Bora be delegated to the militia of local warlords.
Want evidence? Ok: Here it is:
U.S. Concludes Bin Laden Escaped at Tora Bora Fight
Failure to Send Troops in Pursuit Termed Major Error
By Barton Gellman and Thomas E. Ricks
Washington Post Staff Writers
Wednesday, April 17, 2002; Page A01
The Bush administration has concluded that Osama bin Laden was present during the battle for Tora Bora late last year and that failure to commit U.S. ground troops to hunt him was its gravest error in the war against al Qaeda, according to civilian and military officials with first-hand knowledge.
Intelligence officials have assembled what they believe to be decisive evidence, from contemporary and subsequent interrogations and intercepted communications, that bin Laden began the battle of Tora Bora inside the cave complex along Afghanistan's mountainous eastern border. Though there remains a remote chance that he died there, the intelligence community is persuaded that bin Laden slipped away in the first 10 days of December.
After-action reviews, conducted privately inside and outside the military chain of command, describe the episode as a significant defeat for the United States. A common view among those interviewed outside the U.S. Central Command is that Army Gen. Tommy R. Franks, the war's operational commander, misjudged the interests of putative Afghan allies and let pass the best chance to capture or kill al Qaeda's leader. Without professing second thoughts about Tora Bora, Franks has changed his approach fundamentally in subsequent battles, using Americans on the ground as first-line combat units.
In the fight for Tora Bora, corrupt local militias did not live up to promises to seal off the mountain redoubt, and some colluded in the escape of fleeing al Qaeda fighters. Franks did not perceive the setbacks soon enough, some officials said, because he ran the war from Tampa with no commander on the scene above the rank of lieutenant colonel. The first Americans did not arrive until three days into the fighting. "No one had the big picture," one defense official said.
The Bush administration has never acknowledged that bin Laden slipped through the cordon ostensibly placed around Tora Bora as U.S. aircraft began bombing on Nov. 30. Until now it was not known publicly whether the al Qaeda leader was present on the battlefield.
But inside the government there is little controversy on the subject. Captured al Qaeda fighters, interviewed separately, gave consistent accounts describing an address by bin Laden around Dec. 3 to mujaheddin, or holy warriors, dug into the warren of caves and tunnels built as a redoubt against Soviet invaders in the 1980s. One official said "we had a good piece of sigint," or signals intelligence, confirming those reports.
Kudos
Thank you Dave for doing the research proving the statement I made below in my "I don't agree" post, in reply to cleopatra, regarding Rummy's clouded strategery.
The contards don't realize they are up against "The A-Team". They have come to this battle of wits unarmed, with little more than talk radio propoganda with which to defend their positions.
Keep up the good work.
Have a Happy
A G
Tell me
Tell me how do I become member of this exclusive club
"The A-Team"?. I want to become a member.
Do I need to make donation to this website?.
Is it open for non-americans?.
Do all members need high IQ or degree from Ivy league school?
Is it open for people who believe in god?
Do I have to hate Republicans and Mr. Bush?
Who are the present members of this A-Team?
No but.........
.....you will have to do more than just snipe or whine. A little research, some attributions, a quote or two and then some original analysis would be pretty much a minimum.
"Liberalism is trust of the people tempered by prudence. Conservatism is distrust of the people tempered by fear."
William Gladstone, 4-time Prime Minister of Great Britain.
I call dibs on being Mr. T.
I would love to start all my posts with , "I pity the fool!".
Q & A for Cleo:
Q: "Tell me how do I become member of this exclusive club, the 'A-Team'?
A: It isn't exclusive. It's open to anyone who seeks the truth. Anyone who is willing to operate within the bounds of reality, and offer evidence in support of their assertions, thought in support of their opinions and respect, in their treatment of facts is a "part of the team"
Q: "Do I need to make donation to this website?"
A. Donation, no. Contribution, yes. You don't have to agree with everything you read here. There are plenty of times when we've disagreed with each other from major points (e.g., the appropriateness of impeachment and criminal charges for Bushco) to esoterica (e.g., who originated a certain quote). Contributions to this site don't require agreement, they require thought. They require a healthy respect for the truth, that means you find the sources to support your statement (said sources being more than the opinions of Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly et al.), and provide your proof.
Q: Is it open for non-Americans?
A. Is that a trick question? If you can enter the web-site, you can take part. Most of us have no idea where others reside. We just know most of us are Americans who know America can and should do better.
Q: Do all members need high IQ or degree from Ivy League school?
A. I hope not, or I'm done here. My I.Q. is higher than my blood pressure, but I don't know by how much. My B.A. & Ph.D. came from the same university, but it sure as hell isn't in the Ivy League (Hint: They just accepted 2 years probation from the NCAA for payment irregularities in their basketball program).
Q: Is it open for people who believe in God?
A. It's open for everyone. I believe in God. I'm more worried about whether He believes in me. I think if God actually takes an active interest in anything going on here, He has a funny way of showing it.
Q: Do I have to hate Republicans and Mr. Bush?
A: You don't have to hate anyone. If you follow the answer to questions 1 and 2, that should eventually become inevitable anyway.
Q: Who are the present members of this A-Team?
A: Anyone who wants to be, and does the work.
No entry fee, but those membership dues are steep. You've got to actually look for the truth and accept it when you find it.
There is no "A-Team"
There is no "A-Team". It's a metaphorical reference to a popular American television series back in the mid-80's.
What it means is that you can't simply pull stuff out of your hat like your comment about why the New York Times sat on the NSA story for a year, and expect to get away with. You must dazzle us with facts because you can't baffle us with bullshit.
Put simply, all you have to do to be part of "The A-Team" is to be part of what we like to call the "reality-based community". Do your own thinking. Turn off the radio demagogues AND DO SOME RESEARCH.
You want to be part of The A-Team? You can start by answering my questions. They AREN'T going to go away.
Let's recap:
1) ARE YOU IGNORANT of the fact that The New York Times sat on the [NSA domestic spying] story for a year BECAUSE THE ADMINISTRATION ASKED THEM TO ?
[ !! UPDATE !! - IT WAS HAYDEN HIMSELF !! ]
[ !! UPDATE !! - IT WAS HAYDEN HIMSELF !! ]
2) And are you suggesting NYT contributors like David Brooks, William Safire, John Tierney, and Robert Novak ARE LIBERALS?
Differing views are one thing, but parroting lies, spin, and propoganda just ain't gonna cut here. Do some research! The truth isn't always easy to find, but it's out there if you're willing to put in the effort.
Have a Happy
A G
P.S. You know why we're always so sure we're right?... BECAUSE WE DID THE LEG WORK.
A.G., Does that mean
I can't be Mr. T?
The real genius of the conservatives lies in their recognition of how unmotivated people can be to find the truth for themselves. It isn't something new.
In The Brothers Karamazov, Dostoeyevsky wrote the parable of The Grand Inquisitor. Christ comes back during the time of the Inquisition, and is imprisoned as a heretic. An old Cardinal, the Grand Inquisitor, interrogates Him, recognizing Jesus right away.
The story centers on the inquisitor's anger that Christ would come back and mess up 1500 years of work, building on people's ignorance and dependence. They'd finally gotten everyone to the point where they surrendered their individual capacity for truth-seeking to the Church's promises of protection and a better life in the future. The story ends with the Cardinal informing Christ that He'll be burned as a heretic in the morning.
Funny how right after The Idiot (another great work of Russian lit.) took office, his wife, the librarian was asked what her favorite literary work was, and without batting an eye, said, "The Grand Inquisitor".
Not at all!
No, by all means you can be Mr.T!
You've earned it!
I'll bet you pitty the fool!
Have a Happy
A G
Submitted by A G on May 14, 2006 - 5:50pm
You have got to be a ditzoid.
They found the Military Thermite, and more and more people are coming forward to tell the truth about these Towers.
It was a controlled demolition.
PLease go to Scholars for 9/11 Truth and educate yourself.
http://st911.org/
The true virtue of human beings is fitness to live together as equals; claiming nothing for themselves but what they as freely concede to everyone else..J. S. Mill
retract your header, sir
It suggests
your
kookiness
is mine.
H-a-H
A G
Been there, saw........
........that. I didn't see any "military thermite". And thermite is a poor cutting medium. Shaped charges are far more efficient and easier to use. Any form of controlled demolition needs a LOT of preparation to be successful. No one reported any large scale removal of walls and concrete on multiple floors to access the steel structure in any of the WTC buildings.
The so-called evidence of "squibs" detonating are far too few and far apart, and look nothing like a detonation, which typically has a small muchroom cloud at it's outer terminus, and a small ring cloud about halfway out....the "squibs" at the WTC were fan-shaped and of much lower velocity, with the arcing of the material being very apparent. They are just sprays of material being expelled from the building through broken windows by air being compressed by the collapse above.
"Liberalism is trust of the people tempered by prudence. Conservatism is distrust of the people tempered by fear."
William Gladstone, 4-time Prime Minister of Great Britain.
"you should avoid the
"you should avoid the company of anyone who equates President Bush with hitler or calls this gov. fascist or Nazi."
Why would I avoid the most perceptive of people?
And.....would you be so kind, Cleopatsy, to define for me YOUR view of a Fascist government? I know you hate to have to think and come up with original material, but give it a shot.
WHAT IS A FASCIST GOVERNMENT? Ok, go......
"Liberalism is trust of the people tempered by prudence. Conservatism is distrust of the people tempered by fear."
William Gladstone, 4-time Prime Minister of Great Britain.
Oh, yeah....
.....we wouldn't want to be friends with the nation with which we have our longest border and who is our largest trading partner who will be able to supply us with energy and resources for centuries. And why we should drop Switzerland from our list of buddies just mystifies me. Maybe they're just pissed because the corrupt PUDS and US Corporations are hiding their money elsewhere, nowadays.
I have to apologise for this US Regime to everybody in every country where I do business or communicate. England, France, Holland, Egypt, Greece, Belgium, Ireland, Scotland, the list goes on. They all want to know why we elected a crazy man. I wonder, too.
"Liberalism is trust of the people tempered by prudence. Conservatism is distrust of the people tempered by fear."
William Gladstone, 4-time Prime Minister of Great Britain.