News:
Less than a week after President Bush emphatically told the nation that “we’re winning” in Iraq, the U.S. military announced the combat death of a Marine in Anbar province, bringing the death toll for October to 100. It has been the deadliest month for American troops in Iraq in almost two years. Meanwhile, in Baghdad, at least 28 civilians were killed and 60 wounded by an explosion in a predominantly Shiite district. Many of those caught in the blast were laborers gathered to wait for job offers.
A sad, though arbitrary, milestone.
BRING THEM HOME NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DON'T YOU ALL GET IT???
As I've told you before....
It's just the "last throes of the insurgency".
Dick C
Gawd, someday you guys may understand.
"My aim is true" Dick C
*splut*
*puts on phony Spanish accent*
You keep using tha' word. I do no think it mean what you think it mean.
We won't die for Fernando Poo!
The end of the myth
100 deaths for what?
On April 30, 2003, less than six weeks after invading Iraq, Rumsfeld announced the withdrawal of the US military from Saudi Arabia. With this announcement Saudi dissidents and Islamist confederates achieved the goal of bombings that started in Saudi Arabia with the Khobar Towers killing 19 US personnel and ended with 15 Saudis and four conspirators taking over the planes on 9/11.
The administration was in a panic to get out of Saudi Arabia to prevent another attack in the US. Because the US airbase and command center in Saudi Arabia were used to enforce the 'no-fly' zone in Iraq, the administration had to overthrow Saddam before it could withdraw. At the time, little notice was made of Bush's concession to the terrorists because of the fear mongering over mushroom clouds and the grief which gripped the country. In retrospect the withdrawal from Saudi Arabia was not an incidental benefit to the suppression of an imminent threat of the secular tyrant Saddam Hussein giving WMD to his 'terrorist' enemies to use on us. The only substantial reason for the pre-emptive invasion of a sovereign country, a country which was not connected to the 9/11 attacks, was to eliminate the Saudi Base which provoked the bombings since 1996 and the tragedy of 9/11. (Revenge for his father and stealing oil are not mutually exclusive motivations)
The whole idea of 'cutting and running' from the terrorists became moot when Bush gave them what they wanted on April 30, 2003. How many chicken hawks will want to kill more American soldiers once the debate erupts over conceding to terrorist demands and the strategic retreat into Iraq? The propaganda machine will try to mis-characterize the debate and hide behind the troops, but the troops did their job-- the 'mission accomplished' banner on the aircraft carrier Lincoln was accurate-- the military finished the job with Bush I, Cheney and Powell had botched after their 100 hours in the first Gulf War. And that was the only mission they were given, Rumsfeld was ruthless in limiting the mission so commanders could not object or request more resources which might delay the invasion, delay the withdrawal from Saudi Arabia and leave the US open to more attacks. When the banner went up, what had been accomplished-- no WMD, no consolidation of borders, no quelling of looting, no rebuilding and no democracy– that was never their job, never. The only thing accomplished was the elimination of the 'no-fly' zone-- the job which the military had waited years to do, and which they did. Eventually the military will stop agreeing to be the whipping boy for BushCo's Machiavellian incompetence.
There have been no comprehensive plans since the push into Iraq and withdrawal from Saudi Arabia, only ad hoc responses to eliminate political embarrassment. Bush is trying to back away from "stay the course" because it is idiotic once people realize that Iraq was a strategic retreat. Does he really think staying the 'retreat' course is best? Until there is recognition about how and why our military ended up in this quagmire there can be no realistic or effective plans for a workable solution. Any real plan will generate discussion about what happened in 2002 and 2003. They are hoping to continue putting lipstick on this pig for six more days, keep the myth of aggressive attack on terrorism in Iraq going until voters can do nothing.
Sadly, what Democrat has the guts to talk about this? Will Rumsfeld be right, we'll leave a clear look at what happened to the historians? If this subject erupts in the next six days, who knows what will happen, so we had better talk about the ads about Harold Ford, or Limbaugh and Michael J. Fox.
NicoloM
Sadly, there isn't a Democrat with the guts to talk about this, for fear of being labeled a coward &/or conspiracy theorist.
Brilliant think-through on this!
"Because the US airbase and command center in Saudi Arabia were used to enforce the 'no-fly' zone in Iraq, the administration had to overthrow Saddam before it could withdraw."
-- NicoloM
Brilliant think-through on this!
Yes!
That was Osama's demand - removal of the troops in Saudi Arabia. I had read that Bush complied but this is the first time I've read how it links to attacking Iraq. Not only does it explain Iraq attack but kind of figures in to why there was no plan for occupation. Seems like the plan was to set up a permanent base in Iraq and then just 'wing it' with regard to everything else.
Having a permanent base in Saudi Arabia ...
is the primary reason bin Laden's not a big fan of ours or the Royal House of Saud ... infidels on holy land and the Saud's approved of it.
maintaining public order
H.R. 5122: John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007
Section 1076 [about two-thirds down the page] of the massive Authorization Act, which grants the Pentagon another $500-plus-billion for its ill-advised adventures, is entitled,
"Use of the Armed Forces in Major Public Emergencies." Section 333, "Major public emergencies; interference with State and Federal law" states that "the President may employ the armed forces, including the National Guard in Federal service, to restore public order and enforce the laws of the United States when, as a result of a natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health emergency, terrorist attack or incident, or other condition in any State or possession of the United States, the President determines that domestic violence has occurred to such an extent that the constituted authorities of the State or possession are incapable of ("refuse" or "fail" in) maintaining public order, "in order to suppress, in any State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy."
I can see there may be extraordinary and singular circumstances
I can see there may be extraordinary and singular circumstances where martial law may be needed briefly (a matter of days) in an locale due to natural disaster, or long-term power outage, or dirty- or plague-bomb.
But to give that power to the soulless clown currently occupying the White House... >shivers<
webb was writing about what he saw in the nam war
and southeast asia, including a custom there where parents hold up their boy children and put their penises in their mouths.
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics.asp?Page=/Politics/archive/200610/PO...
Bush & Republican machine broke it now our kids pay for it
http://www.icasualties.org/oif/default.aspx
Only 100??
And Chimpy's going to sneeze at that? Ha! Not when "freedom's on the march!". In his mind, this is just more collateral damage, that's all.
Lets see if this shows up anywhere.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/6097636.stm
What was your point?
Do you have an opinion about this attack?
did you find out who Dan Quayle was?
You seem to randomly post stuff. Did your
dad put you up to it? Are you done with
your homework? What costume did your mom
buy you for Halloween? Are you excited?
Send me a picture of you.
Mark F.
I'm confused also as to DT's
I'm confused also as to DT's point concerning the attack on the school. We don't know the circumstances of the school whether it housed jihadists or was as some locals reported,just a religious school.The administration doesn't like anything from the BBC-they (and Fox) consider it farther left than AAR. bush deserves to be under Clinton's desk
Repulsive Disgusting Democrats
Bad enough that Democrats install
judges who are in favor of gay "marriage",
like in New Jersey.
Now it turns out that their new shining star
- Jim Webb, who's running in Virginia against
the next US President George Allen (that will
be the 4th President named George!) - is a
super sick pornographer, who fantasizes not
only about pedophilia, but INCESTUOUS
pedophilia. His writings are too explicit for
the airways.
IS there any choice in November? Methinks not.
Submitted by weasler on October 30, 2006 - 5:34pm
You just gotta love Republicans and their phoney moral outrage. George Allen as the next President? That's got to be the silliest notion I've read of late. Allen will be lucky to survive his Senate race. His aspiration for a presidential bid are finished. What exactly was he arrested for in '74. Seems Virginians care a bit more about that than a bunch of whiney Republicans complaining about passages in a book that John McCain endorsed and the USMC lists in its professional reading program.
Not an answer, pal.
Do you support this child pornographer,
or do you NOT?
Can your see your dreams go up in smoke?
LOL!!
Webb?? A child pornographer??
HHHHHAAAAAAAA!!!!!!! The guy wrote FICTION. Get over yourself. Besides, it's nothing worse than Lynn Cheney writing about lesbian love affairs; Bill O'Lielly writing graphic sex into his books (just the thought of that creeps me out) ... THEY ARE WORKS OF FICTION YOU IDIOT.
Webb?? A child pornographer??
HHHHHAAAAAAAA!!!!!!! The guy wrote FICTION. Get over yourself. Besides, it's nothing worse than Lynn Cheney writing about lesbian love affairs; Bill O'Lielly writing graphic sex into his books (just the thought of that creeps me out) ... THEY ARE WORKS OF FICTION YOU IDIOT.
What an asshole
Uh, liberal lamebrain, MOST pornography
is fiction!
And that even makes it WORSE. What OTHER
sick things does his mind dream up?
Lynn Cheney? What does THAT have to do with
this question. OK, I won't vote for Lynn
Cheney! LOL!!!!
Gee Weasel ...
You really shouldn't call yourself an asshole - shows what low self-esteem you have.
Now you fucking idiot ... Webb wrote FICTION based on REAL-LIFE EVENTS HE SAW IN VIET NAM ... you know, that place overseas that Chimpy, Darth and the rest of the draft-dodging pricks in the Chimpy Administration that deferredd, deferred, deferred themselves from having to serve their country.
Get over yourself ... you're making yourself look more foolish than you already are. Idiot.
lynn cheney is cheney's wife
and according to the repub slime machine, spouses and family are not off limits.
the vice president
is married to a lesbian pornographer.
maybe that's why lynn cheney's
daughter is gay.
according to the repub slime machine
nothing and nobody is off limits. whatever it takes to win.
if webb is a child pornographer
then bush should have him arrested.
Yeah, ha, ha, ha!
A Democrat promotes sexual abuse
of children by parents. Ha, ha, ha!
Man, are you people SICK!
hastert covered up for a sex predator
hastert has not resigned.
Submitted by weasler on October 30, 2006 - 5:48pm
Sorry. Must have missed your “question
Slander?????
They are all TRUE! That's not slander!
The fact is, Webb is a child incest
pornographer. That is the lowest of the
low.
And you know damn well what I mean when
I say your dreams are going up in smoke.
But this is only the beginning. Get set for
the week of you life. What do I mean
by that? You'll see! (Hint: CNN's links to terrorists).
Submitted by weasler on October 30, 2006 - 6:16pm
Wow. So now you've thrown incest into the mix. Fascinating.
Of course, you have yet to address the issue of McCain’s endorsement of “child pornography
Really? McCain did that?
Great! Because that gives us
ammunition against him. McCain
is the only Republican I don't like,
precisely because you people DO.
Submitted by weasler on October 30, 2006 - 6:34pm
I couldn't care less about McCain. His endorsement is simply an illustration of how silly this phoney outrage is. I'm sure McCain will survive your attacks on him. He's no stranger to the radical right's mudslinging.
Why is the USMC recommending child pornography?
mccain is the only
repub who can win the white house. rudy is prochoice so he won't be nominated either.
Weasel's ...
RRRRREEEEEEAAAAAAACCCCCCHHHHHHIIIIINNNNNNGGG!! Don't hurt yourself!
How pitiful, how sad. I feel sorry for you. Ummm ... no, I could care less really.
then why hasn't bush arrested webb?
The fact is, Webb is a child incest
pornographer.
Weasler you are a moron.
I wasn't very concerned about this since I don't live in Virginia but now you made me go and to some research. Check out thsi article which by that bastion of liberalism the washinton post.
http:// www.washingtonpost.com/ wp-dyn/content/article/ 2006/10/27/ AR2006102701000.html
"Webb, a former U.S. Navy secretary, responded angrily Friday on Washington Post Radio, defending his novels as "serious" works and calling Allen's attack part of the senator's negative campaign that is devoid of ideas. "To take these things out and pull excerpts out and force them on people . . . is just a classic example of the way this campaign is run," Webb said. "Literature is literature. I've made my career as a novelist. George Allen doesn't have a record to run on."
Webb's books, including "Lost Soldiers," "Something to Die For" and "Fields of Fire," are historical novels that describe wartime horrors in Vietnam and people dealing with the aftermath of combat. Webb is a decorated Marine who served in Vietnam."
"Webb said the graphic scenes in his novels, many of which are set in wartime, are taken out of context and do not accurately reflect the books or their content: combat. He said he has written about disturbing scenes that he witnessed on the battlefield or as a journalist in Southeast Asia.
"It is an observation about how the human species lives," Webb said after Mark Plotkin, the radio show's host, read one of the more lurid passages, prompting objections from the candidate."
Will you shut up now you spamming neo fascist freak.
"It was believed afterwards that the man was a lunatic, because there was no sense in what he said." "The War Prayer" by Mark Twain
"It was believed afterwards that the man was a lunatic, because there was no sense in what he said." "The War Prayer" by Mark Twain
webb was writing about what he saw in the nam war
and southeast asia, including a custom where the parents hold up their boy children and put their penises in their mouths.
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics.asp?Page=/Politics/archive/200610/PO...
Child pornographer? No
Child pornographer? No weasley, we don't support Foley. Now, Webb's book has been recommended reading by the USMC for about 20 years.... bush deserves to be under Clinton's desk
Pistol -
desperate means calls for desperate measures. They have nothing else to run on so ... they do the next best thing ... SMEAR. And, the sad part is that they can't even smear on RECENT events. They've got to go back 20 some-odd years to do it!
How come...
When YOU cite Foley for messages, that's
fair game.
But when we cite CHILD PORNOGRAPHER
JIM WEBB'S atrocities, that's "desperation".
This coming from a listener of a bankrupt
liberal radio station. LOL!
webb was writing about what he saw in the nam war
and southeast asia, including a custom where the parents hold up their boy children and put their penises in their mouths.
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics.asp?Page=/Politics/archive/200610/PO...
Weasel, Weasel, Weasel ...
Foley was HITTING ON REAL TEENAGERS. Webb's book is FICTION based on REAL EVENTS HE WITNESSED WHILE SERVING IN VIET NAM.
Jesus H. Christ you're stupid.
repubs exposed
foley the sex predator, not dems.
of course, hastert covered up for foley. but hastert is still speaker.
The "when" is irrelavant
Yes, a child pornographer.
God, is he SICK!!! They couldn't even
repeat it on the air!
Keep going, lapdog
That's a good neo-con lapdog. Rove must be mighty proud of you. Smear the decorated war hero, and support the Deserter-In-Chief. Swiftboating is alive and well, despite all logic.
What's wrong, neo-con? Get turned down for enlistment? Get 4-F'd for being psychologically unfit for service?
I see them! I see the fnords!
Freedom is on the march...
DOWN WITH BUSH
DOWN WITH HALLIBURTON
U.S. OUT OF IRAQ NOW
I will ask the expert opinion of you contards...just how does this make me an enemy combatant?
The question in my mind is...
...When will Webb, a CHILD PORNOGRAPHER
(sick!!!!) step down?
Sucking Rush's fat little dick some more?
No mind. You are DANGEROUS. You are a potential Hitler Youth or Brown Shirt, the kind of coward who would turn in your mother, father, wife, or neighbor for having wrong opinions. You have to be stopped.
Hey Nazi Weasel..go fuck off, dumbass.
Desperation really brings out the idiots....
Freedom of Speech and Freedom of the Press applies to even speech you do not like, as Larry Flynt proved many times by whipping the US Govt's ass in court. If you're so damn concerned over some fictional war novel, then God help us for the REAL rapes committed in Abu Gharib and a dozen other countries' prisons WE SUPPORT and RENDER TO.
You should be so upset about REAL child molesters..like most everyone in the GOP. Or REAL sex offenders..like your President and his staff. People who rape and kill REAL CHILDREN.
You're a fucking Nazi asshole, and not even a very good one.
They don't like facts, do they, Heavily?
I bet Wal-Mart sells a lot of "Faded Glory" boxer shorts this week!
"Garsh dern it, Opal, them tax-n-spenders is still ahead in that thar lyin' godless Gallup poll! Let's go ta Wal-Mart, I's so a-scared I plumb soiled another pair!"
WEBB IS A DECORATED WAR HERO
Why do you try to distract frm Allen's ILLEGITIMATE CHILD??
Virginians stand AGAINST ALLEN'S godless, immoral whore-mongering that produced that "whatever" love-child from his raging Jesus-hating loins.
Allen can no longer hide his immoral sins!.
.
Ah well, A.G....
I have no doubt that this swiftboating will bring Webb down. He was losing anyway. But we have other candidates, other races, a shitty economy for the working man and woman, and a bloody war in Iraq. Webb will lose, but Sanctimonious Santorum's going down too.
I am thoroughly enjoying
... watching that creep squirm like a slimey worm in a hot frying pan.
He's pathetic.
.
Submitted by LiberalTraitor on October 30, 2006 - 6:55pm
Actually, Webb is polling very well. Latest results have him ahead. Allen's attacks are backfiring as the Webb campaign welcomes the opportunity to remind folks that while George Allen was playing football and being the best racist he could be, Webb was serving.
The passages in his books were certainly disturbing; he was writing about war. I think that most people without a political axe to grind know that Webb was as horrified witnessing the events as readers are when they read about them.
I also think most Virginians want to know why Allen was arrested in '74 when it is alleged that he was at the height of his bigotry. Is there something to the "deer head in the mailbox" story?
webb was writing about what he saw in the nam war
and southeast asia, including a custom there where the parents hold up their boy chidlren and put their mouths on their penises.
webb was writing about what he saw in the nam war
and southeast asia, including a custom where the parents hold up their boy children and put their penises in their mouths.
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics.asp?Page=/Politics/archive/200610/PO...
Do you know that Michael
Do you know that Michael Moore has made more off of F9/11 than Halliburton has made in Iraq?
BTW didn't Clinton also give no bid contracts to Halliburton?
Source?
You can, of course, provide citations for your data, yes?
I see them! I see the fnords!
repub talking point 1.0
attack clinton
WOW!!
YOU GUYS ARE MORE DESPERATE THAN I THOUGHT!
Who's your NEXT post about?... WILLIE HORTON?!
HAaa!!! HA! HA! HAHA!!! HAaa!!! HA! HA! HAHA!!! HAaa!!! HA! HA! HAHA!!!
=====================
'couple things contard...
1) YOU ARE A LIAR. So far Halliburton has grossed EIGHTEEN BILLION DOLLARS off the Iraq war... MUCH OF IT STOLEN FROM AMERICANS.
If Michael Moore grossed 18 Billion dollars... HE'D BE A REPUBLICAN.
2) Even if it was true, he would not have come by it THROUGH FRAUD AND NO-BID, INSIDER CONTRACTS.
===================
Here's the TRUTH:
Look at the three graphs. Note how Halliburton Iraq revenues, its stock price, AND U.S. CASUALTIES HAVE GONE UP AND UP AND UP.
http://www.halliburtonwatch.org/
War is good business... INVEST SOMEONE ELSE'S KID!
.
The only real topic today...
Bush fucked up.
Iraq == Disaster
No excuses
way to go... heck of a job!!!!!!!!
http://www.icasualties.org/oif/default.aspx
Only ones winning are the Oil Companies
and the industrial war machine that President Eisenhower warned us about, way back when.
"one more job oughta get it"
"One last shot, and we quit it"
"One more for the road"..Boz Scaggs
hear the music the goverment does'nt want you to hear!
Freeform radio takes to the airwaves on www.homegrownradionj.com
Where have alll the protest music gone?
Seasonal tid-bits and good natured Bush Bashing from 9:30 till midnight and beyond!
Join The Rough Draft Freeform radio Program!
Let Freeform Ring!!
The Dems do something right!
Attack like a pit bull and don't let up...
Dems Counter Bush Attack With Iraq Ads
Iraq is one helluva heavy albatross! Tell your friends and neighbors to get away from TV and VOTE.
the corporate media probably won't focus on this
owever, an eyewitness told the BBC that the madrassa school was filled with about 80 local students who had resumed studies after the Muslim Eid holidays.
At least three helicopters were reportedly involved in the attack
People at the scene told reporters that body parts were scattered in the area after the attack.
"We heard helicopters flying in and then heard bombs," villager Haji Youssef said.
"We are all saddened by what we have seen."
A cabinet minister from Pakistan's North West Frontier Province, Siraj ul-Haq, has resigned in protest over the attack.
"This is a very wrong action. They [the victims] were not given any warning. This was an unprovoked attack on a madrassa. They were innocent people," Siraj ul-Haq told the Associated Press before resigning.
And things are going so well...
Today, October 31st, the British parliament may force Blair to come clean on Iraq or dissolve the government.
Better late than never.
The first cut is the deepest; the last the sweetest.
That should be very interesting.
Will Bush's lapdog roll over or will he play dead?
the corporate media has not mentioned this
Today, October 31st, the British parliament may force Blair to come clean on Iraq or dissolve the government.
webb was writing about what he saw in the nam war
and southeast asia, including a custom where the parents hold up their boy children and put their penises in their mouths.
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics.asp?Page=/Politics/archive/200610/PO...
the corporate media has not focused on this
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics.asp?Page=/Politics/archive/200610/PO...
Karnack the unctuous sees floral displays all over:
US Vice-President Dick Cheney says Iraq militants are seeking to influence mid-term polls by stepping up attacks.
Bushie! Doin' a helluva job!
G0P Trinity: Failure, Fraud, and Complete Deceit.
Right!!!
Everyone's obsessed with the elections. How deeply self-centered these losers are at the core?
The G0P Trinity: Failure, Fraud, Deceit
which means freedom and democracy doesn't work
US Vice-President Dick Cheney says Iraq militants are seeking to influence mid-term polls by stepping up attacks.
Remind me again
Exactly why are we there?
Bring peace? BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
Bring democracy? Maybe...except all Iraq has right now is a puppet government which is on its way to becoming a Muslim theocracy.
Find Osama? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Where IS Osama, anyway?
Avenge 9/11? Not even close...Bush HIMSELF stated that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11.
Overthrow a despot? Arguably...but his neighbors could have done that just as easily, and it wouldn't have pissed off the radical Islam factions anywhere near as much, especially since Saddam was militantly secular to the point of being repressive to the mullahs and imams.
What's left? Lessee...could it be...
PROFIT????????
Yep. Could very well be. It's the most logical choice of what's left, anyway.
Five cents, please.
The best way we can support our troops is to install a government that will BRING THEM HOME.
the dems are spineless and weak-kneed
it will take a miracle for them to win. but that miracle appears to be taking shape.