News:
The new U.S. commander in Iraq warned today that "there is no military solution” to Iraq’s disastrous security situation, and said that attacks would continue to increase in frequency and scale unless militant groups were brought into the political process. Meanwhile, another general has told the White House that increased troop levels will need to be maintained into 2008.
To Paraguay......and Beyond!
Argentina/ Bolivia sign billion pipeline deal
http://www.mercopress.com/vernoticia.do?id=10015&formato=html
Argentina and Bolivia signed an agreement for the construction of the Northeast Argentina Gas Pipeline, a project that will require an investment of 1.1 billion US dollars
The ceremony was headed by Argentina’s Federal Planning Minister Julio De Vido and Bolivian Minister Carlos Villegas Quiroga and government officials from both nations.
The gas pipeline is needed to meet the commitments by Bolivia to supply Argentina 20 million cubic metres of gas a day by 2010. The pipeline will go through the provinces of Corrientes, Misiones, Entre Ríos, Salta, Formosa and Chaco.
De Vido said that during his trip to Bolivia scheduled for March 26 both governments will define the tender process for the gas separation plant in Bolivia, the compression plants in both countries and especially the bi-national tender to carry out the whole project.
De Vido added that the project has sufficient financial backing by the Argentine government and warned that no speculators will be tolerated on either side of the border.
More Bush Policy?
http://venezuelaanalysis.com/articles.php?artno=1977
When Bush returns and finds out that his trip has done little to alter the growing leftist trend of Latin America, the iron fist of the new Deputy Secretary of State, John Negroponte, will take control of US policy. Negroponte as ambassador to Honduras helped run the contra war in Nicaragua in the 1980’s, which murdered thousands of innocent civilians in Honduras as well as Nicaragua, and he is known to believe that more aggressive measures have to be taken against Chavez and the gathering storm in Latin America. He comes to his new post after serving as Director of National Intelligence, and prior to that ambassador in Bagdhad. Given that Condoleezza Rice has little expertise in Latin America, Negroponte will set policy for the region, overriding the few remaining moderates in the State Department’s office of Hemispheric Affairs.
With Negroponte we can expect a marked increase in US covert operations, aimed not only at Chavez in Venezuela, but also at the other governments and the popular movements in the region that are leading the charge against the historic US domination of Latin America and are bent on constructing more equitable societies.
Roger Burbach is director of the Center for the Study of the Americas based in Berkeley, California. He has written extensively on Latin America, including, “The Pinochet Affair: State Terrorism and Global Justice.
Good post PB. I think Bush is starting to realize that Chavez
has plans to make the coming Bush Crime Family's exile to Paraguay somewhat less than paradise. Kind of hard to enjoy mint julips when someone is lobbing mortars into your front yard.
Chavez might want to be careful with Negroponte though. With him incharge of Latin American policy, Chavez might want to consider building a deeeep bunker. Negroponte is vicious and will kill him in a heartbeat.
Silence = Acquiescence
NEOCON=TRAITOR
and we'll be paying for his protection in Paraguay for a DECADE
I'll bet they'll be hiring mercenaries on at 200% the rate we now pay the troops to cover the Death Monkey's property.
Wonder WHERE *that* money will be coming from? Certainly not the Estate Tax Cuts..
Mourn not the dead that in the cool earth lie, but rather mourn the apathetic, throng the coward and the meek who see the world's great anguish and its wrong, and dare not speak: Ralph Chaplin
After we pull out of Iraq, the assholes at Blackwater will be
looking for work.
You can bet your ass that they will be getting paid off with some of that "disappeared" Iraqi 10 Billion dollars.
South America: The traditional hiding place for all fascist bastards.
Silence = Acquiescence
NEOCON=TRAITOR
Join the National Guard...
...and see beautiful, exotic Caracas just before we bomb the shit out of it.
Constant war. Good for Halliburton. Good for America.
This morning's sarcasm now concludes.
(Formerly Liberal Traitor--Liberal isn't treason anymore!)
Okay
"...there is no military solution..."
Isn't that exactly what the previous two commanding generals said? And Chimpy replaced both of them, right?
So long, Gen. Petraeus. We hardly knew ye.
One definition of "insanity" is "repeating the same actions expecting different results." Chimpy is looking like he's in a rut of "that general didn't tell me what I wanted to hear, so I'm going to replace him with one who will." It hasn't worked twice now. When does it become insanity, again?
Hrm. Better not follow that route. Chimpy's legal team just might try pulling an "insanity" defense!
It's not a rat race, it's a lemming stampede!
Oh no he di-ent Bad
Oh no he di-ent
Bad General no new star.
.
"There is no military solution"
I guess that's ONE way to get out if Iraq, I hope he's got his bags packed because he (quite likely) just said the wrong thing.
No military solution
WE've asked the cons over and over to define victory with mixed results. MY question is at what point will they EVER say enough is enough? 40 years? How many losses are too many? 50,000 american dead? Our economy in ruins? Trillions in debt?
Well we only lost Vietnam
Well we only lost Vietnam because we left.
Right
I'll have to remember that. DENIAL
You never lose in Las Vegas
You never lose in Las Vegas if you keep doubling down. Eventually you have to win.
Of course 400,000 are dead and we are bankrupt, but we
STILL WON!!!!!
Vegas (or in my case AC)
I want to win so I triple down.
I love the way these revisionists
who were probably "shitting mustard" as a former USAF Seargent friend of mine likes to put it, while the war was going on (what babies do in their diapers).
Sure, another 50K dead marines would have turned the tide. Kind of like the "surge" strategy in Iraq today. You don't count victory by how many of us vs. how many of them are killed. Ho Chi Minh told the French that he would loose 10 men for every one that they lost, and he would still win (and he did).
BTW, when the papers that effectively ended the war were signed with the North Vietnamese, one of the American Generals said "you know we won every major battle that we fought with you", to which the Vietnamese official replied "you know what, you're right -and it doesn't matter".
"History is waiting for George W. Bush with a broom and dustpan."
Well, the first guy should pack his bags
His job is TOAST. All other commanders that stated that a military solution wouldn't work have been booted. If I were him, I'd already be packed. Bushie doesn't like his military toys to *talk back* or *git uppity*.
The other general better make a place on his chest for a few new medals. And buy a Dayplanner so he can keep track of the "Military Toy Tour 2007" he'll be sent on to every Republican PAC meeting held this year.
If he plays *really* nice there might even be *swag* for him *wink wink*
Mourn not the dead that in the cool earth lie, but rather mourn the apathetic, throng the coward and the meek who see the world's great anguish and its wrong, and dare not speak: Ralph Chaplin
Hobby, did you notice
The owner has left NEWS for us on the Home page.
Did you read it?
I did.
"The attitude is we live and let live. This is actually an amazing change in values in a rather short time and it's an example of freedom from religion."--Thomas Wolfe UI
One election at a time......
I just posted to it.
And I hope they get an equitable amount of seats.
But FOX always cheats, always seeks an UNFAIR and UNBALANCED advantage. I doubt they will agree to anything else.
Roger Ailes should do a job he's perfect for -- hunting truffles.
Mourn not the dead that in the cool earth lie, but rather mourn the apathetic, throng the coward and the meek who see the world's great anguish and its wrong, and dare not speak: Ralph Chaplin
Happy International Womens Day ladies.
Now will you please get a woman elected president so I can get something on the radio other than "girl power" programming.
Silence = Acquiescence
NEOCON=TRAITOR
cent...it's a good thing you said, 'please'.........
"The attitude is we live and let live. This is actually an amazing change in values in a rather short time and it's an example of freedom from religion."--Thomas Wolfe UI
One election at a time......
:-)
Silence = Acquiescence
NEOCON=TRAITOR
Thanks centerista!!
IMHO, If we can get a woman BESIDES Hillary, I'd be all for it!
"I encourage you all to go shopping more." George "Chimpy" Bush, 12/20/06.
You are welcome Pook.
Considering she is the only woman running, you are looking at until atleast 2016 before another woman gets a shot. Unless of course the rethugs put up a woman in 2012.
In 2016, if previous patterns prevail,the republicans will probably win. That means woman could have to wait until 2020 or 2024 until another woman democrat will even have a decent opportunity to run for the oval office.
Lots of worldwide woman's issues need to be addressed before then.
Hillary is not perfect, but she is better than the rethug alternatives.
Just something to consider.
JMHO
Silence = Acquiescence
NEOCON=TRAITOR
militant groups were brought into the political process.
Hmmmm... militants brought into the political process....Hmmmmm yes....
And if I remember correctly, and I do...the U S political process, especially when it concerns U S Foreign Affairs...INCLUDES the "U S Diplomatic Corps."
So mr george chimpo walker bush your "new(est) U S Military Commander in the field, the man that has the clearest picture as to what is going on in Iraq and what needs to be done, has ADVISED you... NOW either shit or get off the pot!
If it says politician, hang a quarantine sign on it, then avoid it.
Tom Pearson-Political Independent and proud of it.
Hilary? Not so much!!!
I'm for any human that can do the right thing for "We The People".
Being retired driver, I've seen the female of our species use there little grey cells for communication first, if that doesn't work then the fur flies. Metaphorically speaking.
Oh yea and they have more teeth.
So why do we have a simian in the WH?
That's working well for us.
.
NOT
Just joking of course...but I get a little nervous at the thought of a woman president with PMS having her finger hovering over the nuclear war trigger.
"Take that you creeps...teach you what PMS is all about. Where's my MIDOL....grrrr" LOL
If it says politician, hang a quarantine sign on it, then avoid it.
Tom Pearson-Political Independent and proud of it.
PMS?
My guess is that she's beyond that stage of her life. I'm no fan of hers, but if it comes down to Giulianni and her, well I gotta go with her. By the way....is this how you celebrate Intl. womens' day????
PMS
Stupiidy, incompetence coupled with high testosterone levels is much better.
Besides isn't Hillary 60 years old?
now THIS is utter bullshit
and you know it Tom.
I'd RATHER have a woman with pms in the WH, because she would KNOW it was pms, and not some *eeevil Islamofascist* that was causing her to talk to walls, and seeing enemies everywhere.
If you don't want to be stereotyped as a sexist pig, then don't stereotype women please.
Mourn not the dead that in the cool earth lie, but rather mourn the apathetic, throng the coward and the meek who see the world's great anguish and its wrong, and dare not speak: Ralph Chaplin
Submitted by HobbitGoddess on March 8, 2007 - 10:45am. |
HG:
I'd feel safer with a woman with real PMS in the Whitehouse than I do with a man with imaginary WMDs.
But that's just me.
T2
Submitted by Titu Cosi Hualpa on March 8, 2007 - 9:57am.
Reagan with his finger on the trigger was the scary thing for me.
☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼
"Three great forces rule the world: stupidity, fear and greed." -- Albert Einstein
Dead Eye Dick has usurped MY fear of Ronnie with nukes
Sorry -- but he is pure-D EVIL. He stands for all that is wrong in this country.
Mourn not the dead that in the cool earth lie, but rather mourn the apathetic, throng the coward and the meek who see the world's great anguish and its wrong, and dare not speak: Ralph Chaplin
...with the world Hobby, He is all that is wrong with the WORLD.
No apology necessary.
Silence = Acquiescence
NEOCON=TRAITOR
GAZ
Ole altzheimer reagan couldn't find the trigger with a map and a flashlight and ole nancy would have to have had an Ouiji board to help her locate it in th' "twilight zone." Ooo weee Oooo..da..na na na, da..na na na.
If it says politician, hang a quarantine sign on it, then avoid it.
Tom Pearson-Political Independent and proud of it.
Like I said Hobbs
It was purely a joke...and uhhhh your PMS or Punish My Spouse is showing a teeny bit...
Personally I think its high time for a woman to sit in the oval office...just not Hilary.
I'd like to see Barbara Boxer have a shot at it. She sure as hell couldn't be any worse than the male bimbo there now.
If it says politician, hang a quarantine sign on it, then avoid it.
Tom Pearson-Political Independent and proud of it.
yes -- you are a stereotypical sexist asshole
But I'm JOKING hun!
Now drop and give me twenty!
Of course, you think it's TOTALLY appropriate to label any woman that disagrees with you as suffering from PMS.
So where do I send the bananas and the tire swing?
And I mean it in the *nicest* of terms.
Even my ex-recon marine parent shows more respect for women.
Mourn not the dead that in the cool earth lie, but rather mourn the apathetic, throng the coward and the meek who see the world's great anguish and its wrong, and dare not speak: Ralph Chaplin
hey hobbit
wish you were therehttp://www.militarytimes.com/multimedia/video/aa2mar07/
Get your ass to Iraq, high yella!
http://www.goarmy.com
I hear they now take the functionally illiterate, so you should fit right in. Think of it, Hate...out there in the desert, with all those rough, sweaty men. You know you want it.
(Formerly Liberal Traitor--Liberal isn't treason anymore!)
your a good reason why i'd support a draft
you need to grow up
Such a witty riposte!
If your definition of "grown up" means supporting a war I don't intend to fight, advocating a culture of cruelty toward our citizens, and allowing a bunch of self-serving, narrow minded rich white men to do my thinking for me, then no thank you.
Go and fight this war you so love. Hypocrite. Coward. What would Jesus do?
(Formerly Liberal Traitor--Liberal isn't treason anymore!)
so you get to pick and choose what war to fight.
how elitist. what culture of cruelty to our citizens? what the fuck are you talking about? you mean how you whites treat blacks? so franken moore clinton soros, etal don't think for you? i disagree.
Submitted by hatenomor on March 8, 2007 - 6:25pm
Yes.
It's called democracy.
It is a governing principle of nature, that the agency which can produce most good, when perverted from its proper aim, is most productive of evil.
James F. Cooper
this is as republic stupid
Does democracy really deserve the praise it receives? According to Webster's Dictionary, democracy is defined as "government by the people; especially: rule of the majority." What's so great about majority rule? Let's look at majority rule, as a decision-making tool, and ask how many of our choices we would like settled by what a majority likes.
Would you want the kind of car that you own to be decided through a democratic process, or would you prefer purchasing any car you please? Ask that same question about decisions such as where you live, what clothes you purchase, what food you eat, what entertainment you enjoy and what wines you drink. I'm sure that if anyone suggested that these choices be subject to a democratic process, you'd deem it tyranny.
Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., speaks about the significance of the U.S. Constitution in everyday American life at Shepherd University in Shepherdstown, W.Va., in this Sept. 16, 2005 file photo. (AP Photo/The Journal of Martinsburg, Martin B. Cherry, File) I'm not alone in seeing democracy as a variant of tyranny. James Madison, the father of our Constitution, said that in a pure democracy, "there is nothing to check the inducement to sacrifice the weaker party or the obnoxious individual." At the 1787 Constitutional Convention, Edmund Randolph said, "...that in tracing these evils to their origin every man had found it in the turbulence and follies of democracy." John Adams said, "Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There was never a democracy yet that did not commit suicide." Chief Justice John Marshall observed, "Between a balanced republic and a democracy, the difference is like that between order and chaos."
Our founders intended for us to have a limited republican form of government where rights precede government and there is rule of law. Citizens, as well as government officials, are accountable to the same laws. Government intervenes in civil society only to protect its citizens against force and fraud but does not intervene in the cases of peaceable, voluntary exchange. By contrast, in a democracy, the majority rules either directly or through its elected representatives. The law is whatever the government deems it to be. Rights may be granted or taken away.
Clearly, we need government, and that means there must be collective decision-making. Alert to the dangers of majority rule, the Constitution's framers inserted several anti-majority rules. In order to amend the Constitution, it requires a two-thirds vote of both Houses, or two-thirds of state legislatures, to propose an amendment, and requires three-fourths of state legislatures for ratification. Election of the president is not done by a majority popular vote but by the Electoral College.
Part of the reason for having two houses of Congress is that it places an obstacle to majority rule. Fifty-one senators can block the wishes of 435 representatives and 49 senators. The Constitution gives the president a veto to thwart the power of 535 members of Congress. It takes two-thirds of both houses of Congress to override the president's veto.
In Federalist Paper No. 10, James Madison wrote, "Measures are too often decided, not according to the rules of justice and the rights of the minor party, but by the superior force of an interested and overbearing majority." That's another way of saying that one of the primary dangers of majority rule is that it confers an aura of legitimacy and respectability on acts that would otherwise be deemed tyrannical. Liberty and democracy are not synonymous and could actually be opposites.
Dr. Williams serves on the faculty
Submitted by hatenomor on March 8, 2007 - 6:33pm.
Yes I have a say as do we all.
It's called Democracy.
It is a governing principle of nature, that the agency which can produce most good, when perverted from its proper aim, is most productive of evil.
James F. Cooper
Submitted by hatenomor on March 8, 2007 - 6:33pm
I just realized something. Look at this post by hatenomore:
http://www.airamerica.com/comment/reply/3417#comment-147782
Does democracy really deserve the praise it receives? According to Webster's Dictionary, democracy is defined as "government by the people; especially: rule of the majority." What's so great about majority rule? Let's look at majority rule, as a decision-making tool, and ask how many of our choices we would like settled by what a majority likes.
...
Now think about what he is saying.
1. He was in the middle of a rant about us being elitists for having a say in who we go to war with (you know - democracy) and he post this. What is a republic but an aelite democracy. Only the right to vote by a few deemed worthy of citizenship - landowners. You know damn well that if owning land was still a criteria for voting, the whole interest rate/ housing market portion of our economy would be vastly different than it is today.
2. 'Does democracy really deserve the praise it receives?' is what he wrote. What was it we were supposedly spreading in Iraq?
It is a governing principle of nature, that the agency which can produce most good, when perverted from its proper aim, is most productive of evil.
James F. Cooper
by f u bush2 on March 8, 2007 - 11:55pm
Damn. You've put waaay too much thought into the ramblings of an obviously delusional moron.
Submitted by Guy Fawkes on March 8, 2007 - 11:06pm
I had read the first paragraph of that article he posted before leaving for home. In the car the sentence about democracy being owrth it just hit me.
Perhaps many Iraqi's are asking 'Does democracy really deserve the praise it receives?'
It is a governing principle of nature, that the agency which can produce most good, when perverted from its proper aim, is most productive of evil.
James F. Cooper
by f u bush2 on March 9, 2007 - 12:20am
I hear you, but if you can ever make sense of what that idiot says(or the articles he posts), then I'll know you've had a lobotomy.
by f u bush2 on March 8, 2007 - 11:55pm
He deserves nothing but scorn & derision from thinking people.
Submitted by Guy Fawkes on March 8, 2007 - 11:06pm
Guy was that you who posted the video message from Dean yesterday?
I liked that. I never thought to go to the web site of the democratic party.
It is a governing principle of nature, that the agency which can produce most good, when perverted from its proper aim, is most productive of evil.
James F. Cooper
by f u bush2 on March 9, 2007 - 12:24am
Yep, I posted that video.
I love that guy.
Pick the war?
Why not? Bush CHOSE to attack Iraq. He didn't have to. Iraq wqas not an immediate danger. There was no possibility of imminent attack there. He had no ability to attack us directly mi9litarily. If he can chose why can't we?
Submitted by LiberalIconoclast on March 8, 2007 - 6:20pm
We really need to reach out to the wealthy kids and get them to join up. Take broschures out to the wealthy neighborhoods and knock on doors. Support form that quarter would drop quickly.
We had this conversation with my in-laws. Blind Bush supporters. Don't even know where Iraq and Afganistan are. We really started lobbying to get the 20 year old son to join. The mother cried. She had said at some point during the discussion that ALL the military were over there because they want to be. She had no idea that it wasn't that clear cut. I don't know how she could justify talking up the wonderful values of the troops for going over there to fight Bin Laden in Iraq and then actually say she didn't want her son to go.
It is a governing principle of nature, that the agency which can produce most good, when perverted from its proper aim, is most productive of evil.
James F. Cooper
Submitted by rhinknomor on March 8, 2007 - 7:14pm.
your a good reason why i'd support a draft
Well, you're the reason that I support abortion.
"He prayeth well, who loveth well, Both man and bird and beast." - Samuel Taylor Coleridge
Submitted by Xanadu on March 8, 2007 - 6:29pm
actually I support a draft whole heartedly.
Come on Hatenomore. You and I both start a callign campaign to get a draft going. Lets see how much more of America wakes up then.
Two things need to seriously change in this country:
1. If we go to war we have war declared by the congress as per the constitution.
2. If war is declared then a draft is mandatory. Period.
Oh I know all sorts of reasons to argue against that. I don't care. We won't start wars if a draft is mandatory.
It is a governing principle of nature, that the agency which can produce most good, when perverted from its proper aim, is most productive of evil.
James F. Cooper
huh maybe you've forgotten one important thing
war can be and has been declared against us.
Submitted by hatenomor on March 8, 2007 - 6:36pm
Please.
Get real.
We didn't declare war on Iraq!
We have a police action against Iraq!
We shouldn't have done so!
We should have taken out Bin Laden and made an example of what happens to such people. There was no 'war'.
It is a governing principle of nature, that the agency which can produce most good, when perverted from its proper aim, is most productive of evil.
James F. Cooper
Submitted by f u bush2 on March 8, 2007 - 7:40pm.
We didn't declare war on Iraq!
And neither Iraq or Afghanistan declared war against the United States.
"He prayeth well, who loveth well, Both man and bird and beast." - Samuel Taylor Coleridge
the war resolution
Joint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq
Whereas in 1990 in response to Iraq's war of aggression against and illegal occupation of Kuwait, the United States forged a coalition of nations to liberate Kuwait and its people in order to defend the national security of the United States and enforce United Nations Security Council resolutions relating to Iraq;
Whereas after the liberation of Kuwait in 1991, Iraq entered into a United Nations sponsored cease-fire agreement pursuant to which Iraq unequivocally agreed, among other things, to eliminate its nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons programs and the means to deliver and develop them, and to end its support for international terrorism;
Whereas the efforts of international weapons inspectors, United States intelligence agencies, and Iraqi defectors led to the discovery that Iraq had large stockpiles of chemical weapons and a large scale biological weapons program, and that Iraq had an advanced nuclear weapons development program that was much closer to producing a nuclear weapon than intelligence reporting had previously indicated;
Whereas Iraq, in direct and flagrant violation of the cease-fire, attempted to thwart the efforts of weapons inspectors to identify and destroy Iraq's weapons of mass destruction stockpiles and development capabilities, which finally resulted in the withdrawal of inspectors from Iraq on October 31, 1998;
Whereas in 1998 Congress concluded that Iraq's continuing weapons of mass destruction programs threatened vital United States interests and international peace and security, declared Iraq to be in "material and unacceptable breach of its international obligations" and urged the President "to take appropriate action, in accordance with the Constitution and relevant laws of the United States, to bring Iraq into compliance with its international obligations" (Public Law 105-235);
Whereas Iraq both poses a continuing threat to the national security of the United States and international peace and security in the Persian Gulf region and remains in material and unacceptable breach of its international obligations by, among other things, continuing to possess and develop a significant chemical and biological weapons capability, actively seeking a nuclear weapons capability, and supporting and harboring terrorist organizations;
Whereas Iraq persists in violating resolutions of the United Nations Security Council by continuing to engage in brutal repression of its civilian population thereby threatening international peace and security in the region, by refusing to release, repatriate, or account for non-Iraqi citizens wrongfully detained by Iraq, including an American serviceman, and by failing to return property wrongfully seized by Iraq from Kuwait;
Whereas the current Iraqi regime has demonstrated its capability and willingness to use weapons of mass destruction against other nations and its own people;
Whereas the current Iraqi regime has demonstrated its continuing hostility toward, and willingness to attack, the United States, including by attempting in 1993 to assassinate former President Bush and by firing on many thousands of occasions on United States and Coalition Armed Forces engaged in enforcing the resolutions of the United Nations Security Council;
Whereas members of al Qaida, an organization bearing responsibility for attacks on the United States, its citizens, and interests, including the attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, are known to be in Iraq;
Whereas Iraq continues to aid and harbor other international terrorist organizations, including organizations that threaten the lives and safety of American citizens;
Whereas the attacks on the United States of September 11, 2001 underscored the gravity of the threat posed by the acquisition of weapons of mass destruction by international terrorist organizations;
Whereas Iraq's demonstrated capability and willingness to use weapons of mass destruction, the risk that the current Iraqi regime will either employ those weapons to launch a surprise attack against the United States or its Armed Forces or provide them to international terrorists who would do so, and the extreme magnitude of harm that would result to the United States and its citizens from such an attack, combine to justify action by the United States to defend itself;
Whereas United Nations Security Council Resolution 678 authorizes the use of all necessary means to enforce United Nations Security Council Resolution 660 and subsequent relevant resolutions and to compel Iraq to cease certain activities that threaten international peace and security, including the development of weapons of mass destruction and refusal or obstruction of United Nations weapons inspections in violation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 687, repression of its civilian population in violation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 688, and threatening its neighbors or United Nations operations in Iraq in violation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 949;
Whereas Congress in the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution (Public Law 102-1) has authorized the President "to use United States Armed Forces pursuant to United Nations Security Council Resolution 678 (1990) in order to achieve implementation of Security Council Resolutions 660, 661, 662, 664, 665, 666, 667, 669, 670, 674, and 677";
Whereas in December 1991, Congress expressed its sense that it "supports the use of all necessary means to achieve the goals of United Nations Security Council Resolution 687 as being consistent with the Authorization of Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution (Public Law 102-1)," that Iraq's repression of its civilian population violates United Nations Security Council Resolution 688 and "constitutes a continuing threat to the peace, security, and stability of the Persian Gulf region," and that Congress, "supports the use of all necessary means to achieve the goals of United Nations Security Council Resolution 688";
Whereas the Iraq Liberation Act (Public Law 105-338) expressed the sense of Congress that it should be the policy of the United States to support efforts to remove from power the current Iraqi regime and promote the emergence of a democratic government to replace that regime;
Whereas on September 12, 2002, President Bush committed the United States to "work with the United Nations Security Council to meet our common challenge" posed by Iraq and to "work for the necessary resolutions," while also making clear that "the Security Council resolutions will be enforced, and the just demands of peace and security will be met, or action will be unavoidable";
Whereas the United States is determined to prosecute the war on terrorism and Iraq's ongoing support for international terrorist groups combined with its development of weapons of mass destruction in direct violation of its obligations under the 1991 cease-fire and other United Nations Security Council resolutions make clear that it is in the national security interests of the United States and in furtherance of the war on terrorism that all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions be enforced, including through the use of force if necessary;
Whereas Congress has taken steps to pursue vigorously the war on terrorism through the provision of authorities and funding requested by the President to take the necessary actions against international terrorists and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organizations or persons who planned, authorized, committed or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001 or harbored such persons or organizations;
Whereas the President and Congress are determined to continue to take all appropriate actions against international terrorists and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organizations or persons who planned, authorized, committed or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such persons or organizations;
Whereas the President has authority under the Constitution to take action in order to deter and prevent acts of international terrorism against the United States, as Congress recognized in the joint resolution on Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107-40); and
Whereas it is in the national security of the United States to restore international peace and security to the Persian Gulf region;
Now, therefore, be it resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SEC. 1. SHORT TITLE.
This joint resolution may be cited as the "Authorization for the Use of Military Force Against Iraq".
SEC. 2. SUPPORT FOR UNITED STATES DIPLOMATIC EFFORTS
The Congress of the United States supports the efforts by the President to--
(a) strictly enforce through the United Nations Security Council all relevant Security Council resolutions applicable to Iraq and encourages him in those efforts; and
(b) obtain prompt and decisive action by the Security Council to ensure that Iraq abandons its strategy of delay, evasion and noncompliance and promptly and strictly complies with all relevant Security Council resolutions.
SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES.
(a) AUTHORIZATION. The President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to
(1) defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and
(2) enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council Resolutions regarding Iraq.
(b) PRESIDENTIAL DETERMINATION.
In connection with the exercise of the authority granted in subsection (a) to use force the President shall, prior to such exercise or as soon there after as may be feasible, but no later than 48 hours after exercising such authority, make available to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate his determination that
(1) reliance by the United States on further diplomatic or other peaceful means alone either (A) will not adequately protect the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq or (B) is not likely to lead to enforcement of all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq, and
(2) acting pursuant to this resolution is consistent with the United States and other countries continuing to take the necessary actions against international terrorists and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organizations or persons who planned, authorized, committed or aided the terrorists attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001.
(c) WAR POWERS RESOLUTION REQUIREMENTS. --
(1) SPECIFIC STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION. -- Consistent with section 8(a)(1) of the War Powers Resolution, the Congress declares that this section is intended to constitute specific statutory authorization within the meaning of section 5(b) of the War Powers Resolution.
(2) APPLICABILITY OF OTHER REQUIREMENTS. -- Nothing in this resolution supersedes any requirement of the War Powers Resolution.
SEC. 4. REPORTS TO CONGRESS
(a) The President shall, at least once every 60 days, submit to the Congress a report on matters relevant to this joint resolution, including actions taken pursuant to the exercise of authority granted in section 2 and the status of planning for efforts that are expected to be required after such actions are completed, including those actions described in section 7 of Public Law 105-338 (the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998).
(b) To the extent that the submission of any report described in subsection (a) coincides with the submission of any other report on matters relevant to this joint resolution otherwise required to be submitted to Congress pursuant to the reporting requirements of Public Law 93-148 (the War Powers Resolution), all such reports may be submitted as a single consolidated report to the Congress.
(c) To the extent that the information required by section 3 of Public Law 102-1 is included in the report required by this section, such report shall be considered as meeting the requirements of section 3 of Public Law 102-1.
Submitted by thinknomor on March 8, 2007 - 7:45pm.
How ignorant are you? That was no declaration of war. That just authorized the President to use force against Iraq.
"He prayeth well, who loveth well, Both man and bird and beast." - Samuel Taylor Coleridge
I swear to god, he must get paid by the pound!!!
Silence = Acquiescence
NEOCON=TRAITOR
On Nov 6th, 2006, America declared war on Neo-cons
"The attitude is we live and let live. This is actually an amazing change in values in a rather short time and it's an example of freedom from religion."--Thomas Wolfe UI
One election at a time......
Perhaps...
But by OSAMA BIN LADEN (remember him?), not by IRAQ, Seenomore.
"The most important thing is for us to find Osama bin Laden. It is our number one priority and we will not rest until we find him."
- G.W. Bush, 9/13/01
"I want justice...There's an old poster out West, as I recall, that said, 'Wanted: Dead or Alive,'"
- G.W. Bush, 9/17/01, UPI
"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority."
- G.W. Bush, 3/13/02
"I am truly not that concerned about him."
- G.W. Bush, repsonding to a question about bin Laden's whereabouts,
3/13/02 (The New American, 4/8/02)
(Formerly Liberal Traitor--Liberal isn't treason anymore!)
That is a hell of an idea FU.
If war is declared then a draft is mandatory. Period.
That would make for one hell of an amendment.
Thinking long and hard before attacking another country is a GOOD thing.
Silence = Acquiescence
NEOCON=TRAITOR
Submitted by tomp46 on March 8, 2007 - 10:34am. |
tomp:
You can relax on this one.
Trust me.
As long as NO MAN is stupid enough to ask the POTUS if she is "Having Her Period" we are all safe.
It's never the hormones. It's inevitably that question that starts the shit flying.
LOL
T2
Under Clinton
advisers were allowed to challenge the boss. According to Clinton that made for good dialog. I want some who wants to be challenged.
Bush fires anyone who asks tough questions.
That's real bullshit.
Tough questions
Especially when "What's for dinner?" is a tough question.
Turn on Fox
Like Cheney the maids probably have to make sure Fox is on at all times. The boss needs more propaganda.
No military solution
Are there any generals left that agree with the Shrub? He must be on the last ones.
I have to wonder
He certainly is going through them at a hell of a clip. Pretty soon he's going to have to start using colonels; all the generals will have been fired.
Go, lemmings, go!
Meet the new generals
Pyle and Bailey (Gomer and Beetle)
I hear the Boy Scouts have some available cubs
And they'd be sure to keep those *dreaded homo-sexuals* out of the service.
Especially the Republican boytoys.
Mourn not the dead that in the cool earth lie, but rather mourn the apathetic, throng the coward and the meek who see the world's great anguish and its wrong, and dare not speak: Ralph Chaplin
*dreaded homo-sexuals*
....but they will conveniently over-look the pedophiles...
a day without boy toys is a day without sunshine for Republicans
think Mark Foley.
Mourn not the dead that in the cool earth lie, but rather mourn the apathetic, throng the coward and the meek who see the world's great anguish and its wrong, and dare not speak: Ralph Chaplin
Hey Hobby, did you hear about the Marine honored at the CPAC
convention turned out to be a gay porn star?
The way these asshole keep shooting them selves in the foot is hysterical.
Especially after the Coulter Faggot remark.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/max-blumenthal/cpacs-gay-porn-star-hono_b_...
HHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!
OMFG I am laughing so hard I am gonna puke.
WHAT Idiots!!!
Silence = Acquiescence
NEOCON=TRAITOR
oh yeah! Wonder if he offered his *services* to Hannity
or O'Lielly?
Esopecially to Billo, who seems to be an *expert* on porn.
And boys who are raped.
Mourn not the dead that in the cool earth lie, but rather mourn the apathetic, throng the coward and the meek who see the world's great anguish and its wrong, and dare not speak: Ralph Chaplin
"Thirteen inches is a tough load..."
"...and I won't treat you gentle. You've heard of me, and that's good. So you know. I'm Jeff Gannon. No, Johnny Gosch. No, wait, Dirk Diggler.
Now I'm gonna ask you nice just one more time...
Where the fuck is Limbaugh?"
Billo would be driving a truck down Sherman Way, looking to
beat up any stray rentboys.
Of course, when he was alone on Sherman Way, he'd be carrying small bills and looking for *love*.
And he'd dress JUST like Burt Reynolds did in Boogie Nights.
Mourn not the dead that in the cool earth lie, but rather mourn the apathetic, throng the coward and the meek who see the world's great anguish and its wrong, and dare not speak: Ralph Chaplin
I wonder if that's what Cpl. Matt Sanchez (model conservative)
meant when he said liberals were degrading him and "spitting" on him.
I guess Bilbo and Hannity need their gaydar recalibrated.
Silence = Acquiescence
NEOCON=TRAITOR
Sanchez was charging $250 bucks a POP - if he had to leave
his house. $200 if the clients came to him.
Wonder if "Rod Majors" issued receipts to his clients?
And if he paid TAXES.
Mourn not the dead that in the cool earth lie, but rather mourn the apathetic, throng the coward and the meek who see the world's great anguish and its wrong, and dare not speak: Ralph Chaplin
Laura Bush asks SS Agent Rod Woody:
"Agent Woody, where's the President?"
Chim-Chim (from Anal Office): "I'm just going over some important state business! Be right out, dear!"
Agent Woody: "Oh, he's just masturbating to gay porn, ma'am."
Laura: "Again? Well, Cook is noticing all that lard missing from the kitchen!"
(Formerly Liberal Traitor--Liberal isn't treason anymore!)
well daaaaayum!
I had heard that Cheney used the lard on Rove and Tony Snow, during those nekkid wrestling matches they staged to make the Chimpenfuhrer smile!
I guess the clot put a stop to those. Poor Chimpy.
Mourn not the dead that in the cool earth lie, but rather mourn the apathetic, throng the coward and the meek who see the world's great anguish and its wrong, and dare not speak: Ralph Chaplin
So he wasn't just a whore, but a cheap whore.
No wonder he and MAN Coulter get along so well.
Yet more proof that she is really just a neo-con T-Girl posing as a cheap bigoted conservative hack.
Silence = Acquiescence
NEOCON=TRAITOR
"I'm a neocon and I'm OK..."
I cut down libs, I wear high heels
Suspendies and a bra.
I wish I had big man-tits
Just like my dear Limbaugh!
LOL!!! I just SPLUNGED all over my desk.
That was just rude.
Silence = Acquiescence
NEOCON=TRAITOR
bwahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!
bwahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!bwahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!
bwahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!
bwahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!
bwahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!
bwahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!
::cough cough::::
bwahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!
bwahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!
bwahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!
bwahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!
bwahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!
:coughing and laughing still:
Damn you! I'll be humming this ALL day!
bwahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!
bwahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!
Mourn not the dead that in the cool earth lie, but rather mourn the apathetic, throng the coward and the meek who see the world's great anguish and its wrong, and dare not speak: Ralph Chaplin
Submitted by LiberalIconoclast on March 8, 2007 - 11:09am.
LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!
It is a governing principle of nature, that the agency which can produce most good, when perverted from its proper aim, is most productive of evil.
James F. Cooper
Submitted by LiberalIconoclast on March 8, 2007 - 1:09pm
:lol: :lol: :lol:
BRILLIANT!!!
Errr....
...that...
...you...
...*headdesk*
On second thought, let's not go to Camelot. It is a silly place.
"It's only a model"
"Sssshhhhh"
Silence = Acquiescence
NEOCON=TRAITOR
"No Child Left Out of Boot Camp!"
At least the poor and not-white ones.
Actually I can see press gangs making a comeback too. I wish they'd grab my military-age white Republic neighbors first!
(Formerly Liberal Traitor--Liberal isn't treason anymore!)