Show Schedule:
Weekday
Saturday
Sunday
[ Times shown are EST ]Fred Thompson Confirms it
News:
In an interview with USA TODAY Fred Thompson makes it clear that he plans to run. He's planning an unconventional campaign using blogs, video posts and other Internet innovations to reach voters repelled by politics-as-usual in both parties.
Yeah buddy!
I've been waiting for this!
Secure our borders! Win the War! Fred Thompson '08!
Do any of you libs REALLY want Mrs. William J. Clinton as the Commander-in-Chief?
Hillary will mop the floor
with Thompson. No Republican has a chance after Bush.
Fred_Dalton_Thompson.......neo-scum
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Dalton_Thompson
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article3330.htm
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Corporate_Welfare/S&L_Bailout.html
Fred Dalton Thompson : enabled S & L crisis of '80s
Please spread the word....this is not the type of man we want as President.
In 1975, Thompson began his eighteen year engagement as a lobbyist in Washington, D.C., eventually representing clients including Westinghouse, General Electric (the current corporate owner of the NBC Universal-NBC television network), and the Tennessee Savings and Loan League.[6]
[..]
By 1982, Thompson worked the U.S. Congress membership as a lobbyist for passage of the Savings and Loan deregulation legislation desired by the Tennessee Savings and Loan League --- in this case, federal deregulation legislation allowing for additional government support of ailing S&Ls; giving U.S. thrifts the freedom to invest in potentially more profitable, but riskier, ventures; and eliminating interest-rate ceilings on new accounts to increase S&Ls' competitiveness.
Enacted into law during in September 1982, the Senate bill pushed by Thompson was incorporated into the Garn - St Germain Depository Institutions Act of 1982.
The Garn - St Germain Depository Institutions Act of 1982 is widely credited with having laid the groundwork for the U.S. Savings and Loan crisis of the late 1980s.[6] ---------------------
The savings and loans crashes of the 1980s, themselves directly the result of Reagan’s deregulation of the banking industry, is more interesting because of how it reflects the rapacious nature of unbridled capitalism than of Neil Bush himself. Who by the way, is now embroiled in another scam with his latest venture, educational software, Ignite
(turnover $20 million, much of it from educational subsidies obtained in the state of Florida ,where, ‘coincidentally’ of course, his bro Jeb, is governor).
Altogether, it’s been calculated that bailing out the failed S&Ls countrywide cost the US taxpayer around $1.4 trillion!
---------------
By the time Ronald Reagan took office in 1981, two-thirds of the nation's S&Ls were losing money and many were broke. If all the problem thrifts had been shut down right then, the government's insurance fund would have covered their debts.
Instead, the government delayed an average of two years-and, in some cases, as many as seven years-thus allowing bankrupt S&Ls to go on losing billions of dollars.
This delay also gave S&Ls a chance to gamble on questionable investments, in an attempt to regain solvency. But first they had to convince Congress to deregulate them.
One night in 1980, Representative Fernand St Germain (D-Rhode Island), whose $10,000-to-$20,000-a-year restaurant and bar tab was paid for by the S&L industry's chief lobbyist, proposed raising federal insurance on S&L savings accounts from $40,000 to $100,000- even though the average size of an S&L account was $6,000.
He waited until after midnight, when only eleven representatives were still on the floor of the House; they approved his proposal unanimously. But St Germain was just getting warmed up.
In 1982, he cosponsored a bill that removed all controls on what S&Ls could charge for interest and released them from their century-old reliance on home mortgages.
it figures you would want this -- another handpuppet
Gee -- he can speak lines -- let's make him PRESIDENT.
Can't fix stupid.
Question with boldness even the existence of God; because if there be one, He must approve the homage of Reason rather than that of blindfolded Fear. -- Thomas Jefferson
Submitted by Fight4it on May 30, 2007 - 11:06am
I wouldn't get too excited just yet, sparky. Recently, politico.com has been wrong more than once.
On some great & glorious day the plain folks will reach their hearts desire at last, & the White House will be adorned by a downright moron. - H.L. Mencken
three cheers for Fred..
what is it that you like about him so much(I really want to know)why is he the "one"..is it cuz the others dont cut it?..his voting record?his fame?...is he the great white hope?not try'n ta be and ass,just like to know..Is it time to rapture these fake christians yet?
Submitted by shloger on May 30, 2007 - 12:41pm. |
It's the red pick up truck he campaigns in. It has all the contards like Frogglodyte in a big lather. :~)
Submitted by shloger on May 30, 2007 - 12:41pm
It kind of falls to intangibles. I don't like is positions on AB or Gay rights. But I'll trade those dislikes for his stated strength in the area of defense. I know I'm going to get slapped around for this but here goes. He seems most like Reagan then any other Republican candidate. His support of gun rights works for me and this differs from Rudy. I vote based on more than one issue but defense of this nation is paramount.
Submitted by Fight4it on May 30, 2007 - 1:02pm
He seems most like Reagan then any other Republican candidate.
----------------------
That might be because he's the only dumb Hollywood Elitist running in the Party that hates dumb Hollywood Elitists.
Being desperate to keep power sure makes for some nasty smelling hypocrisy, FRightenedTwit.
P-U!.
*** *** *** ***
"The Democratic leadership has surrendered to a president who happily blackmails his own people and uses his own military personnel as hostages to his asinine demand..." --Keith Olbermann
Yawn, yet another stay the
Yawn, yet another stay the course neocon. After 8 years of neocon rule, corruption, scandal, illegal spying, cronyism, gross incompetence and wars based on lies, there is no way in hell another stay the course PNAC neocon will be elected. Get over it, you guys are OUT in 08.
Support Operation YELLOW ELEPHANT
Sign Up or SHUT UP.
Submitted by Tremolux on May 30, 2007 - 1:13pm
So you want to see Mrs. William J. Clinton as the Commander-in-Chief?
You are kidding....I hope...
I would definately like to see
Hillary as pres. It really does not matter what I want, Hillary will be the next pres.
Submitted by hufflarry2000 on May 30, 2007 - 1:21pm
Hillary will be the next pres.
----------------------
Not if I and hundreds of thousands of other primary voters can do something about it.
I gotta tell you, huff: each time I read a comment like yours or I hear Hillary utter some variation of "When I'm President", it only motivates me that much more to make certain she's not...
Keep it up. I'm getting energized.
*** *** *** ***
"The Democratic leadership has surrendered to a president who happily blackmails his own people and uses his own military personnel as hostages to his asinine demand..." --Keith Olbermann
Submitted by Fight4it on May 30, 2007 - 1:18pm
Wouldn't you adore a President Hillary Clinton with all the expanded powers of Shrubco?
Yummmmm...tastes good , don't it.
Beg4it needs reality check
I'd rather see Hillary as Prez than ANY fucking PNAC stay the fucked-up course neocon. Actually, Hillary is not my first choice, I'd rather see Edwards, Obama or even Gore.
But there is one thing you can bet your chickenhawk neocon ass on, the next Prez will NOT be a PNAC/AEI neocon. Neoconservatives make this world a more dangerous place with their idiotic policies. Neocons are as big an international terrorist organization as alQaeda.
Support Operation YELLOW ELEPHANT
Sign Up or SHUT UP.
Submitted by Tremolux on May 30, 2007 - 2:47pm
Hillary ... than ANY fucking PNAC stay the fucked-up course neocon
---------------------
You're able to tell the difference between the two? I'm not.
*** *** *** ***
"The Democratic leadership has surrendered to a president who happily blackmails his own people and uses his own military personnel as hostages to his asinine demand..." --Keith Olbermann
Submitted by Tremolux on May 30, 2007 - 1:13pm
I hope you poeple give us a real alternative and nominate Richardson or Edwards (should have been him in 06)...But Mrs. Clinton will get the nod from moveon.org and the Oprah crowd...
I would only...
vote for that ex-college republican (Hillary) if it would be a slap in the face to all those who have been involved in the farsical impeachment of her husband. Otherwise I know she is just another shill for the corporatists like her husband was.
The field is so pathetic on both sides it makes me wish I had some 'disposable income' to run on. But I, like so many other Americans, are economically locked out of the political process.
The only vice we're allowed anymore is the one our balls are in!
Submitted by Cybershaman on May 30, 2007 - 1:40pm
I'll go with that, the impeachment of Bill Clinton was moronic. I'm sure there were better things out there. Wasted a BUNCH of money just because he got a hummer... Why didn't he just say "Yeah, I did it...SO?!?"
Submitted by Fight4it on May 30, 2007 - 1:46pm
Why didn't he just say "Yeah, I did it...SO?!?"
Submitted by Fight4it on May 30, 2007 - 1:46pm
Just like Gonzo did....
Just like Monica Goodling did...
Why didn't he just say?
Same reason that Newt didn't admit to the affair he was having at the same time he was trying to crucify Clinton.
Submitted by gt6 on May 30, 2007 - 2:03pm
And Newt should be blasted for it.
I disagree
Aside from Newt's hipocracy I don't think either one should be raked over the coals for trying to keep a private affair private.
Submitted by gt6 on May 30, 2007 - 2:28pm
Point...
I just hate the hypocrisy more than the issue. If you want to have an affair, fine. But don't portray yourself holier than thou...
I REALLY don't like Jim Baker...
Fuck MoveOn and Oprah, they
Fuck MoveOn and Oprah, they don't speak for all of us. I do get MoveOn's emails and sign some of their petitions, but I decide for myself who the best person would be. I do NOT want the pendulum to swing all the way from the extreme right (where it is now) to the extreme left. I want left of center, but no whackjobs.
Hell, even Olbermann called MoveOn "extreme left".
Support Operation YELLOW ELEPHANT
Sign Up or SHUT UP.
I agree that I don't want an extreme lefty
I also agree that Hillary is not my first choice. HOWEVER my problem with Hillary is that she is too far RIGHT. She is right on many issues, possibly a little too left on some, but definately too corporate in businees philosophy.
Hillary, like Bill, are
Hillary, like Bill, are indeed a little too far right for my liking on a couple issues, but with that said, they certainly are not as far to the right as McCain, Giuliani and the Mormon. At least Hillary is NOT a stay the wrong course PNAC neocon.
The latest polls I saw last night show her slightly behind Obama. (With Obama beating all 3 top neocons, Hillary beating all but Giuliani.) Like I said earlier, she certainly isn't my first choice, but she's better than a neocon. Any neocon. Personally I'm pulling for Obama, Edwards and maybe even Gore. All left of center, but not whackjob extremists.
I really don't see MoveOn effecting the DNC selection process as much as they will disrupt and smear the GOP. Don't worry about MoveOn if you're a Dem, they will be busy digging up the dirt on the neocons and will have little if any impact on the convention results.
Support Operation YELLOW ELEPHANT
Sign Up or SHUT UP.
I saw a poll showing Hillary beating any Republican
In fact the poll showed any Dem beating any Rep.
Submitted by hufflarry2000 on May 30, 2007 - 4:54pm
Well then, you were looking at an old poll. The latest polls show Obama in the lead.
On some great & glorious day the plain folks will reach their hearts desire at last, & the White House will be adorned by a downright moron. - H.L. Mencken
Zogby dissagrees
http://www.zogby.com/Soundbites/ReadClips.dbm?ID=15096
Anybody but Hillary....
Huffy
Again, back up what you say. Where is this Poll?
Submitted by Tremolux on May 30, 2007 - 5:50pm
At least Hillary is NOT a stay the wrong course PNAC neocon.
---------------------------
Bullshit.
It's impossible to square that statement with her vote for, and her continued support of, the occupation of Iraqnam.
*** *** *** ***
"The Democratic leadership has surrendered to a president who happily blackmails his own people and uses his own military personnel as hostages to his asinine demand..." --Keith Olbermann
Submitted by Tremolux on May 30, 2007 - 2:52pm
I hope you are right. But unlike the Repubs who seem to be moving away from the religious right (we seem to like Rudy - pro choice) the dems seem to be moving toward Moveon. I respect Olbermann's opinion and he seems genuine (wrong many times) but genuine.
I'm OK with right or left of center as long as the pendulum is more center then either righ or left.
Keep the government out of my pocket and the church out of my bedroom..
fight..
there is hope for you yet....Is it time to rapture these fake christians yet?
I think the distance between
I think the distance between the GOP and the far right fundies is a result of two actions. One, the rank and file Repub sees them as religious nuts and exremists, and understands that if the party is associated with extreme right positions, they will lose the middle, and hence, the election. OTOH, the fundies see themselves as being betrayed by the GOP who talked a good game but did not deliver on those promises on the social domestic agenda.
Hopefully the Falwell crowd will crawl back into their holes and patiently await their rapture.
Pragmatic Republicans will try to move their party back from the extremes, more towards the center, or else risk losing it all. America is fed up to death with the far right wing whackjob extremists like the neocons and the bible thumpers. You can thank Bush, Cheney, Falwell and Robertson for all that, plus their do-nothing rubber stamp congress under DeLay and Frist.
The only regions who will still support the right wing whacks are the deep south, which is full of religious fanatics, racist rednecks, hillbillies and rubes.
Support Operation YELLOW ELEPHANT
Sign Up or SHUT UP.
he's an actor....
so he can lie with conviction.....Is it time to rapture these fake christians yet?
Clinton Socialist...
You people hear about Mrs. William J. Clinton's introduction to Socialism speech yesterday.
"I prefer a 'we're all in it together' society," she said.
Vagina envy?
Or does your fear of women just boil over at the thought of a woman in the white house?
Oh wait -- you're the one who wants a NEW handpuppet in the White House.
As long as it has a dick, right?
Question with boldness even the existence of God; because if there be one, He must approve the homage of Reason rather than that of blindfolded Fear. -- Thomas Jefferson
Well actually,
I think he would prefer a white dick more specifically.
Fortunately for the neocons, white dicks are all they have to offer, ranging from small to negligible.
since you make your living off
the big govt and the taxpayers and have socialized healthcare, you are an expert on socialism. You are a practicing SOCIALIST!
Submitted by hufflarry2000 on May 30, 2007 - 12:15pm
I've mentioned this before but in case you have a difficult time reading with comprehension..
Having a job with benefits does not a socialist make. It is when you depend on the govt because you've made bad choices and you are unable to get a good job and need the govt for those benefits that you are a socialist. (People who are UNABLE to work, do require assistance).
Try it some time....Getting a good job I mean. It works wonders for your self image. I made sacrifices that most Americans would not for my job...
you have NO fucking CLUE of which you speak
But of course, like all the other little bootlickers -- ingnorance doesn't shut your rabid piehole.
Keep whining Beg4It. It's soooo YOU.
Question with boldness even the existence of God; because if there be one, He must approve the homage of Reason rather than that of blindfolded Fear. -- Thomas Jefferson
The govt and taxpayers
pay for your employment and your socialized healthcare. You work for the big govt. The big government provides everything in your life. Therefore, you are a socialist
It has nothing to do with bad choices. You joined the socialist brigade because it was easier and had more security. Being a socialist yourself, you really should learn more about who you are and what you do.
Sorry, but I am a capitalist, a business owner in the private sector and the free market. I do not need the big govt to make a living.
Submitted by Fight4it on May 30, 2007 - 12:11pm.
"I prefer a 'we're all in it together' society," she said.
Submitted by Fight4it on May 30, 2007 - 12:11pm.
What the hell is wrong with all of us being "in it together"???WTF??? You're not serious, you're just trying to yank peoples chains.
Submitted by othello on May 30, 2007 - 12:22pm
Not when you combine it with her other statements about other industries:
"I would take those profits..." Who the hell is she to take anybody's profits? Hugo Chavez!!!!
The Democratic senator said what the Bush administration touts as an "ownership society" really is an "on your own" society that has widened the gap between rich and poor.
"I prefer a 'we're all in it together' society," she said. "I believe our government can once again work for all Americans. It can promote the great American tradition of opportunity for all and special privileges for none."
That means pairing growth with fairness, she said, to ensure that the middle-class succeeds in the global economy, not just corporate CEOs.
IMO: Her statment smacks of socialism. Can you deny that?
beggy,,,you'll like this link
http://www.airamerica.com/node/3805#comment-197569
I'll believe it when I see it....
IMO: Her statment smacks of socialism. Can you deny that?
Submitted by Fight4it on May 30, 2007 - 12:29pm. |
..but I believe she is talking about limiting the power of corporations. Leveling the playing field.
The Democratic senator said what the Bush administration touts as an "ownership society" really is an "on your own" society that has widened the gap between rich and poor.
Submitted by Fight4it on May 30, 2007 - 12:29pm
The Bush ownership society is a cataclysmic failure. The huge disparity between Executive and worker pay alone is enough to convince me of that. Maybe part of that ownership society should include everyone "owning" an affordable, comprehensive health care policy? No?
Submitted by othello on May 30, 2007 - 12:53pm
I've already stated that I think a Universal Primary Care system would probably be good for our nation (fiscally). Better than using the ED as Primary Care which is what many poor have to resort to now...
Submitted by Fight4it on May 30, 2007 - 1:05pm.
Right, so we can agree that Bush's ownership society is a monumental failure, much like Reagan's "trickle down" economics? Now I have to bust yer chops; Doesn't a "Universal Primary Care" system sound suspiciously like....socialism? :~()
I have to log off and go to work now.....good day to you, fighty.
Submitted by othello on May 30, 2007 - 1:23pm.
Yes, it does but I'm living in the real world here. We have laws saying that you cannot turn away a person in need at the ER. Fine. From a business and health care access standpoint, IMO it would be cheaper to have people see a PCM for routine needs rather than go to the ER for a cold/fever or wait until that bacterial infection becomes so bad that it is an emergency. Yes, it is a "socialist" move but I support it because IMO it would save tax payer dollars over time...
Why is it ...
When anybody tries to bring some economic justice to this banana republican system the neocons have foisted upon the working class, the nimrods start screaming "SOCIALISM"? There is nothing 'Free Market" about a system that has been corrupted by extreme greed. The ill gotten money that came from the S+L bailout was used to leverage hostile takeovers where the 'conservative' economic base worked in every underhanded way possible to disenfranchise the 'liberal' economic base. Since 'liberals' are reluctant to utilize slave labor 'conservatives' gained an economic benefit by selling out their own constituants. Eventually the ethically challenged turds from both parties bobbed to the surface, where, they have been tirelessly working to increase their own personal economic power at the expense of eveyone else. These 'elitists' will continue to financially rape the rest of us until we overcome our diversions with desperation and the blood will flow. The pattern is set, the results are inevitable. It is only a matter of time.
Every system collapses in on itself if a small group of families refuse to understand that they must support the infrastructure that is supporting them also. Capitalistic, Socialistic, Communistic all break down in the same way. The only difference is how that power is gained. Through connections or exploitation of your workers.
The only vice we're allowed anymore is the one our balls are in!
Submitted by Cybershaman on May 30, 2007 - 1:28pm
I gotta take issue on this one..
"Since 'liberals' are reluctant to utilize slave labor 'conservatives' gained an economic benefit by selling out their own constituants."
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2006/11/pelosis_illegal_alien_employ...
As Peter Schweizer notes in his best—selling expose of liberal hypocrisy, "Do As I Say (Not As I Do)," part of the fortune of this defender of the working man is a Napa Valley vineyard worth $25 million that she owns with her husband. The vineyard produces expensive grapes for high—end wines. Napa grapes bring up to $4,000 a ton compared with $300 a ton for, say, San Joaquin grapes.
But Pelosi, winner of the 2003 Cesar Chavez award from the United Farm Workers, hires only nonunion workers and sells these grapes to nonunion wineries. [....]
Which makes Pelosi's steadfast opposition to any attempts to enhance border security and stem the flow of illegal immigration into the U.S. all the more interesting since she seems to be among those rich employers who financially benefit from a steady supply of cheap foreign labor. [....]
best-selling expose? Yeah -- it's on the REMAINDER table
But you go right ahead with your delusions ROFLMAO!!!
Question with boldness even the existence of God; because if there be one, He must approve the homage of Reason rather than that of blindfolded Fear. -- Thomas Jefferson
a useless right wing propaganda site
not a word is true. How much of the vinyard does Pelosi own? Does she make all the business decisions? Does she do the hiring?
Submitted by hufflarry2000 on May 30, 2007 - 1:38pm
I understand that since the article didn't come from the left wing that it doesn't matter. Typical attack...Ho hum...
Submitted by Fight4it on May 30, 2007 - 1:51pm
No, it doesn't matter cause it's a fuckin' slanderous lie. Read my response and get with the facts, dickhole.
*** *** *** ***
"The Democratic leadership has surrendered to a president who happily blackmails his own people and uses his own military personnel as hostages to his asinine demand..." --Keith Olbermann
It was already proven untrue
try to keep up.
The Real Nancy Pelosi
http://sadbastards.wordpress.com/2006/11/10/the-real-nancy-pelosi-multi-...
more right wing propaganda
It is not true, not a word of it.
*yawn* another little boy with vagina envy
Just like his buttbuddy Beg4It.
Question with boldness even the existence of God; because if there be one, He must approve the homage of Reason rather than that of blindfolded Fear. -- Thomas Jefferson
Man or Woman
Just because I disagree with a woman does not mean I have any sort of envy. But, you prove it is easier for you to make ridicules allegations and comments then to actually discuss a point. I would vote for Condoleeza Rice in a second if She ran for President. Would you?
Not a chance
She is complicit in the Bush Crime Family. But you like all the deaths of american soldiers over Bush lies dont you? You love murder. Those are your Republican values. No morals or conscience. And VERY stupid.
just keep showing your ignorance
KindaSleezy is far too busy giving BJ's to every Bush compatriot in the Middle East, to make up for all the mistakes he's made.
Question with boldness even the existence of God; because if there be one, He must approve the homage of Reason rather than that of blindfolded Fear. -- Thomas Jefferson
Hobbit - Thats my point
You would not vote for a conservative, male or female. So you see, being a woman has nothing to do with me voting for or against Hillary or not agreeing with Pelosi. If I was in line with there views on issues, I would vote for them. I am not.
My point of responding to you is to point out the fact that, you can not have a discussion. you resort to name calling and, based on your last response, crude language, to attempt to discuss an issue. However, again, given the chance to make a legitimate argument, you fail.
Rice is not a conservative
she is a neocon, a fascist. No one will have a dicussion with you because you are willfully ignorant, uneducated, and a liar. You are the enemy we true americans are fighting against. You want to destroy my country and replace it with your sick, perverted form of fascism. I will never, ever treat anti american scum like you with respect. You dont deserve it. You deserve a one way ticket out of america.
Submitted by Jim2244 on May 30, 2007 - 4:20pm
I would vote for Condoleeza Rice in a second if She ran for President.
------------------------
Despite 3,000 dead Americans on American soil as a result of a failure to keep the NATION SECURE on her watch as....
wait for it...
NATIONAL SECURITY Advisor.
Keerist, you're one dumb sheep.
*** *** *** ***
"The Democratic leadership has surrendered to a president who happily blackmails his own people and uses his own military personnel as hostages to his asinine demand..." --Keith Olbermann
And she is a confirmed liar!!
And she is a confirmed liar!!
The Real Nancy Pelosi
http://sadbastards.wordpress.com/2006/11/10/the-real-nancy-pelosi-multi-...
Submitted by Fight4it on May 30, 2007 - 1:34pm
Now read the 1975 Agricultural Labor Relations Act and educate yourself on how it makes it illegal for owners to assist their workers in the formation of a union, dolt.
And, as an aside: " the Pelosis pay more than union workers are paid in the same valley.."
Kinda shits all over your silly little slanderous lie, now doesn't it?
*** *** *** ***
"The Democratic leadership has surrendered to a president who happily blackmails his own people and uses his own military personnel as hostages to his asinine demand..." --Keith Olbermann
What are you talking about
Pelosi only hires non-union employees and it is not her fault. WalMart hires non-union employees and they are evil. Again, double standard, mixed with double talk, mixed with lies.
Submitted by Jim2244 on May 30, 2007 - 1:59pm
What are you talking about
----------------------
Something you clearly do not understand, Adolf. Go stick your head back in the sand.
*** *** *** ***
"The Democratic leadership has surrendered to a president who happily blackmails his own people and uses his own military personnel as hostages to his asinine demand..." --Keith Olbermann
You can not explain your position
So you name call....very mature.
Submitted by Jim2244 on May 30, 2007 - 2:10pm
You can not explain your position
--------------------
Pssst: I didn't state a position. I debunked the lie posted by your circle-jerk buddy.
Do try to keep up.
*** *** *** ***
"The Democratic leadership has surrendered to a president who happily blackmails his own people and uses his own military personnel as hostages to his asinine demand..." --Keith Olbermann
name calling is what bootlicking retards deserve
So shut it and take it like a man.
Question with boldness even the existence of God; because if there be one, He must approve the homage of Reason rather than that of blindfolded Fear. -- Thomas Jefferson
do you take notes while watching Fox Mr. Howard?
Or do you have others write it down for you?
Question with boldness even the existence of God; because if there be one, He must approve the homage of Reason rather than that of blindfolded Fear. -- Thomas Jefferson
Unfortunately ...
...your argument only proves that the working class has no voice in the present political atmosphere. Due to the machinations I stated in my previous post, the ethically challenged turds have floated to the top. It makes no difference which party you look at. The only difference is how pervasive it is, and the Republicon party is packed fuller than a spastic colon. The Democrats have their examples also, but it is not as fully embraced.
BTW, your take on Universal Healthcare looks suspiciously like what the 'liberals' have been saying for thirty years. Just like King George's take on the environment sounds like what 'liberals' have been saying for decades. If it wasn't for the stereotypes that have been spoon fed to you regarding 'liberal' positions, over the years, you might see that we really have the same goals in mind, only differing ways of acheiving those goals. Your ways don't seem to be working out too well.
OH ... another BTW ... how many offshore sweat shops are owned by banana republicans? Cayman isle anyone?
The only vice we're allowed anymore is the one our balls are in!
Submitted by Cybershaman on May 30, 2007 - 1:57pm
I won't argue with that both parties have their issues. The reason the new dems haven't been hit as hard (recently) is because they haven't been in DC very long. Give them time and many of them will be just like Rep. William Jefferson. The difference, the repubs flush our crap like Cunningham and Foley. The dems hold onto it Fienstine (Dianne Feinstein resigns committee post amid scandal; accused of war profiteering), Jefferson (90K in freezer), Kennedy(need I say more)...
The Reps flush their crap?
You CANT be serious! That was too stupid of post to be taken seriously.
Submitted by Fight4it on May 30, 2007 - 2:08pm
The difference, the repubs flush our crap like Cunningham and Foley
----------------------
Psssst: Cunningham wasn't flushed by Republicans. He was found guilty after being prosecuted in a court of law.
His bribery was known to Republicans long before he was indicted, yet they just let that piece-of-shit float around in the toilet. Try again.
*** *** *** ***
"The Democratic leadership has surrendered to a president who happily blackmails his own people and uses his own military personnel as hostages to his asinine demand..." --Keith Olbermann
Ahhhhh....
It seems that the Repubs only flush away those who have been exposed and threaten to bring others down with them. NO? The neocons keep bringing up Jefferson's freezer money. But there has been no evidence that it was being used for illegal purposes. It sounds bad but even if it was stashed for his personal use it pales in comparison with the millions lost in Iraq. Maybe Republicans are better at opening secret bank accounts. Oh, I went to the site on Pelosi. Where are the links to the evidence? Heresay doesn't convince me of anything. What an echo chamber that was. It's hard to think critically when you can't hear yourself think over the din of repeated stereotypes. Hi IJ! I miss the rough and tumble debating, gotta find more time to post here.
The only vice we're allowed anymore is the one our balls are in!
Millions lost in Iraq
CORRECTION - Billions
at least the
media will have something to talk about besides rich girls getting D.U.I's and dead Americans..Is it time to rapture these fake christians yet?
Can we add this
to the who gives a shit file?
so this will be...
the troll hang out for today..times must be hard..Is it time to rapture these fake christians yet?
As long as the dude is not
As long as the dude is not wishy washy like both Clintons, or Obamma.
Rudy or him is ok by me, and even though I disagree with Richardson, he would be the best guy for the job on the dems side.
We need to rid our country of "Clinton-Gore" samo old ass crap for years now.You libs want a change but yet we will have the same old arguments or worse if either Gore or Hillary gets in.
Time to put the past in the past, along with "Bush"
Latley Obamma is looking more black, for some reason, not his appearance but the people around him.And you can bet all that great knowledge of the constution will go by the wayside once his group influences him. ie, (we are black)
I know he doesn't think that way, but he will afterwards.The same way cheny influenced Bush.
WARNING
http://www.blackfive.net/
"An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last." - Sir Winston Churchill
http://www.freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html
*yawn*
So there's another eminently-unelectable PNAC wannabee with his hat in the ring.
Are we supposed to give a shit now, or after he has his ass handed to him in the primaries?
The g0p has YET to have anyone step up who has a snowball's chance in a blast furnace of getting into the Oval Office without cheating the way the Oathbreaker did.
g0p = modern-day lotus-eaters = p\/\/n3d!
So just because YOU say it's
So just because YOU say it's impossible makes it so anyone else you don't want a cheat.
your thinking rather child like, I must say.
WARNING
http://www.blackfive.net/
"An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last." - Sir Winston Churchill
http://www.freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html
And you
Sound dumber than a retarded 3 year old when you try to talk/type. Seriously, was there an actual SENTENCE anywhere in there?
is this the Neener Neener response?
When shall we expect the "I'm rubber, you're glue" response dumbass?
Question with boldness even the existence of God; because if there be one, He must approve the homage of Reason rather than that of blindfolded Fear. -- Thomas Jefferson
My, my, my
How SHRILL you've gotten, little troll-monkey. Still putting your fingers in your ears and yelling "NANANANANANANA I CAN'T HEAR YOU", I see.
Sticking your head in the sand doesn't make those pesky FACTS go away. Just as your precious Oathbreaker-in-Chief is soon to discover for himself, whether he (or you) like it or not.
And your inanity doesn't change the simple, stubborn, irreducible FACT that Thompson is eminently un-electable. Possibly even more so than Rudy. The g0p would have a far, far better chance of getting Isaac Kleiner elected than anyone currently saying they're running on their ticket!
g0p = modern-day lotus-eaters = p\/\/n3d!