Lebanon: is this the start of a World War?
Christopher Allbritton provides the latest on a Hezbollah-fuelled conflict in Beirut, suggesting it may be a coup. Juan Cole weighs in saying it’s 2 steps closer to a civil war. But the link he provides to veteran correspondent Liz Sly includes the big picture:
The last time Lebanese fought street battles on this scale was during the 1975-90 civil war, when Muslims and Christians fought in a variety of combinations. But never did Lebanese Sunnis and Shiites directly clash, making this a dangerous new development, both for Lebanon and for a region rife with Sunni-Shiite fault lines.
Standing behind the factions are their respective patrons, the U.S. and Saudi Arabia in the case of the pro-government forces, and Iran and Syria on the Shiite side. As long as Iran and the U.S. are not talking, it is unlikely their clients elsewhere will see fit to compromise, said Paul Salem, director of the Carnegie Endowment’s Middle East Center in Beirut.
“This is a very serious deterioration,” he said. “There’s already a Sunni-Shiite war in Iraq. and if this continues there could be a third one in Bahrain, a fourth in Kuwait, a fifth in Saudi Arabia and so on. These are oil-producing areas. You’re already talking about $120-a-barrel oil now, and wars in these countries are really going to get people’s attention.”
In addition to the potential for a Middle East-wide war (with its potential to involve the entire oil dependent world) between now and Labor Day, the odds of a massive oil price spike that pushes gasoline to $5/gallon is extraordinarily high.
And just when Republicans thought things couldn’t get any worse for them … and for our exhausted troops … and for the majority of the citizens of the Middle East caught in the middle of the war zone created by extremists in their governments and the terror orgs … and for all of us who’ll foot the bills.
After the housing bubble, we’ll get our oil bubble and maybe even a war bubble. And the only bright side to all of it is that bubbles soon collapse.
- Original article
- FILED UNDER: Guest Blogger
- May 9, 2008








Like all good non-thinking repubs and Hillbots
(one and the same), you equate anything less than 150% support for Israel with being pro-terrorist, anti-American, and anti-Semitic. I have news for you. No one is perfect, and that applies to nations as well as individuals.
Why don't you move to Syria or Lebanon or the West Bank or Gaza, and see how wonderful it is. How about Gaza, with an unemployment rate of 70%, and almost no fuel, as it has been shut down by Israel. No incoming medicine, the power plant has been shut down, so people can get sick, sit in the dark and sweat, and enjoy having no money for little luxuries like food. Hmmmm, where have I heard that before? Could it be that great Bush victory, Iraq?
You say we shouldn't sit down and discuss peaceful solutions to countries that want to exterminate the "holy" state of Israel? Well, we sat down over many decades to discuss peaceful solutions that wanted to wipe out our own country, and you know what? We're still here, none the worse for wear. If it's good enough to ensure our own survival, why isn't it good enough for Israel? Oh, that's right. They are "holy", and the only way to make sure the "holy chosen ones" are safe is to butcher as many millions as it takes to make them feel all comfy and cozy. You would have thought that their spies would have stolen enough secrets from us to make them more comfortable, and their sales of some of our most secret and sophisticated weapons to China would have given them enough new friends to keep them safe. That, and the wars we promised to fight for them to make them feel good. Cheney promising in 2001 that we would take out Iraq, and then take out Iran and Syria after that at Israel's request.
- parent
By UffdaguyMay 9, 2008 - 4:33pm