Bush's Midas Touch

(AP Photo/Karim Kadim)
The first known case of sex recorded on a mobile leading to murder was in 2004. Film of a boy making love with a 17-year-old girl circulated in the Kurdish capital, Arbil. Two days later she was killed by her family and a week later he was murdered by his. -- The IndependentThey are burning women alive in Iraq. Pouring paraffin over them and letting the die a horrible death because they have had sex. Shaira law is spreading in Basra and in other areas of southern Iraq. After decades there are men fighting in the streets in Lebanon again. Turkey has all but permanently invaded northern Iraq. The fallacy that Bush has made America safer is only valid if you don't include losing New Orleans or protecting our civil liberties. Or if you believe that "hasn't happened yet" equals "not going to." But, it is extremely clear that the middle east is not only a much more dangerous place, it has descended into religious terror and violence across the region.
Remember when our foreign policy was all about maintaining peace in the region? Remember fears of setting the middle east ablaze? Like many things from the reality based community that concept went out the window with reverse midas Bush. I am sure that Israel thought our invading Iraq and posting 100,000 troops next door in Iraq was a good idea, but as more and more goes wrong in more and more places, I suspect that that feeling of safety is running on par with Bush's polling numbers.
Our inability to win the "peace" as the pentagon's Orwellian phrase goes is a major factor in this. This is now beyond a military solution and has been for years. Having less people with guns around is a good first step. Nobody notices the sniper on the roof across from the womens shelter because that's normal.
- Original article
- FILED UNDER: Guest Blogger
- May 19, 2008








Do you think the residents
Do you think the residents of the areas of town that "you would never live in" want to live in such conditions either!?!?!? Of course not! Poverty breeds crime, what would you expect? Without providing a real means for them to get out of poverty (and don't give me that "pull yourself up by your bootstraps crap), it will persist.
Your stats on the Civil Rights bill area bit disingenuous as you don't give the complete breakdown.
Southern Democrats: 7-87 (7%-93%)
Southern Republicans: 0-10 (0%-100%)
Northern Democrats: 145-9 (94%-6%)
Northern Republicans: 138-24 (85%-15%)
It was only the Southern democrats who really opposed the bill. Northern Democrats supported it at 94%, greater than the 85% of northern Republicans who supported it. On top of that, 100% of the Southern Republicans opposed it. Granted there were only 10 of them, but still... See that's called being "honest". I could have just said that 100% of Southern Republicans opposed it, but I gave full disclosure and said there were only 10 of them.
The "bad apples" were mainly in the South, where racism persisted (and still does) more prevalently!
-- McCain = Four more years of the same --
- parent
By dtaylo75May 20, 2008 - 2:20pm