Wow!

Well I'll put my physics degree from one of the top schools in the country and many multiples of 30 hours against that.

I'll add my professional experience in financial fraud and proper legal investigations.

So in your 30 hours of study, here is just a few of thousands of things you missed. The NIST scientists and engineers have no explanation of any kind for WTC7. They have no explanation for the failure of the 2 Towers after the collapse initiation. Their test models do not support their collapse initiation theories.

And there IS NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER that Bin Laden funded the operation, which immediately shows that you do not know what you are talking about. The FBI does not even list Bin Laden as having participated in 9/11.

And if you think a bunch of scrawny kids with box-cutters could subdue our multi-billion dollar air defense system and outwit our state of the art intelligence agencies, then there are a few alien sites I could refer you to.

I am sure that you believed the Gulf of Tonkin attacks were real too until ... ooops, the government has years later admitted they were a hoax. Now how could the government be involved in a successful cover-up for so many years. Hmmmm.

I am sure, with your engineering background (LOL), you believed that junk science invented by the FBI just for the JFK assassination that they could microscopically compare and trace the bullet fragments that hit JFK to the cartridges left behind (supposedly) by Oswald until ..... ooooops, the FBI just recently admitted that they sorta just made it all up and it is another hoax - more junk science.

Seems to me that you have a thing for believing in hoaxes. How are you on bigfoot? Loch Ness? Aliens? To be nice - yes - I'll just stick with calling that being uniformed and gullible. I'd hate to think that you are outright stupid. Where did you get the engineering degree from?