Comes As No Surprise We’re Destablized

By Spencer Ackerman

Via reader Macaquakerman, Talat Massoud -- a member in good standing of the Pakistani military establishment -- has an instructive piece in the Daily Times that tells us what U.S. foreign policy looks like in Islamabad.

From the US perspective the immediate threat of Islamic radicalism rests along the Pak-Afghan border; the Iranian nuclear danger could be dealt with at a more opportune moment. Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama has also been saying that Iraq is the wrong war and Afghanistan the right one. It would not be long before the US decides to terminate the war in Iraq and declare Afghanistan and Pakistan as the epicentres of the global war on terrorism.

Clearly, any such move will inflame passions in Pakistan. Anti-American sentiments will rise exponentially. The civilian government would be destabilised and moderate forces will be further marginalised. For the Taliban and Al Qaeda this would be an ideal situation.

I'd weigh in on this but right now I have to finish up today's Crappy Hour with Megan before my imminent flight to Austin for Netroots Nation. I'll be in the air when it goes live, but click through after 10 a.m. to see us talk about Jesse Jackson and some other shit.

So in the view of Pakistan, it would piss them off if we

actually wised up, got the hell out of Iraq, and decided to go back and finish the job in Afghanistan that we should have focussed on from the beginning?

TOO DAMN BAD!!!! Pakistan vies with Israel for being the worst ally the US could possibly have. Pakistan is eager to take billions of dollars in US aid while providing support for the Taliban and Al Qaeda, mouthing platitudes that they really, really want to find Osama bin Laden. Pakistan's ISI supported the Taliban and helped them come to power in Afghanistan in the first place, with the assistance of the Pakistani army. The Afghanistan-Pakistan border has always been porous, so much so that the Pakistanis allowed bin Laden to escape over the border into Pakistan from Tora Bora. If we are to really deal with Al Qaeda and the Taliban, we need to deal with the Pakistan-Afghanistan border regions, and we need to get out of the same tired mold of supporting a leader instead of a nation. Musharraf is NOT Pakistan. Mubarrak is NOT Egypt. Maliki is NOT Iraq. Ahmadinajad is NOT Iran. The US always seems to end up supporting a person over a process. No wonder people around the world find our talk about democracy to be confusing and contradictory. We tell them that we want them to have free and fair elections, but if they choose someone we don't like, we immediately try to take them down. Once they have someone we approve of, or at least can stomach, we support them no matter what they do. Did anyone see that Karzai fired the chief prosecutor in Afghanistan yesterday, just after that man declared he would be a candidate in the presidential elections next year?

If we want to deal with other nations, especially in areas like the Middle East, and build stability, we need to start supporting processes, not individuals. Maybe Pakistan would shape up if we made it clear we support a democratic process, and not a man who lies to our faces while he steals our money, a man who took power in a coup and manipulated elections.