Comes As No Surprise We’re Destablized
Via reader Macaquakerman, Talat Massoud -- a member in good standing of the Pakistani military establishment -- has an instructive piece in the Daily Times that tells us what U.S. foreign policy looks like in Islamabad.
From the US perspective the immediate threat of Islamic radicalism rests along the Pak-Afghan border; the Iranian nuclear danger could be dealt with at a more opportune moment. Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama has also been saying that Iraq is the wrong war and Afghanistan the right one. It would not be long before the US decides to terminate the war in Iraq and declare Afghanistan and Pakistan as the epicentres of the global war on terrorism.
Clearly, any such move will inflame passions in Pakistan. Anti-American sentiments will rise exponentially. The civilian government would be destabilised and moderate forces will be further marginalised. For the Taliban and Al Qaeda this would be an ideal situation.
I'd weigh in on this but right now I have to finish up today's Crappy Hour with Megan before my imminent flight to Austin for Netroots Nation. I'll be in the air when it goes live, but click through after 10 a.m. to see us talk about Jesse Jackson and some other shit.
- Original article
- FILED UNDER: Guest Blogger
- July 17, 2008








If what we are fighting in Iraq
really was predominantly AQ, then leaving would present a lot of difficulty. Taking our troops out would be followed by a huge increase in violence that Iraqi troops would be hard pressed to handle. But that is not the case.
Most of those fighting in Iraq are Iraqis, angry at the US occupation. When American troops leave, they will have gotten what they wanted all along. If they keep fighting us as we leave, it could only delay our departure further. Why keep fighting after you won?
With us out of the picture, the Iraqis can focus on AQ. They are a small faction with little local support.
- parent
By gt6July 17, 2008 - 10:03am