Republicans Say Dems Health Care Bills Too Pricey
Sunday October 25, 2009 11:44 a.m.
FILE - In this Sept. 17, 2009 file photo Sen. Mike Johanns, R-Neb., second from left, talks about health care reform on Capitol Hill in Washington with, from left, Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H., Johanns, Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., Vermont Gov. James Douglas, and Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour. Johanns, in the GOP's weekly video and radio address Saturday Oct. 24, 2009, asked voters a basic question about Democratic proposals to overhaul the nation's health care system; "Will this improve your life?" (AP Photo/Harry Hamburg, File)
WASHINGTON (AP) — With landmark health care votes expected in the coming weeks, Republicans are warning voters that the Democratic plan to expand coverage to millions who lack it will increase costs for the average American.
In the GOP's radio and Internet address Saturday, Nebraska Sen. Mike Johanns said the health care legislation would mean higher monthly premiums and taxes, as well as cuts to Medicare for older people.
"There's no doubt about it," said Johanns.
Democrats have denied these claims, contending that health care costs are already spiraling out of control and will only continue to rise if Congress doesn't act. They say their plan would ultimately lower prices because it would rein in wasteful spending. They cite, for example, the high costs of hospitals treating uninsured patients in the emergency room that gets passed on to other patients.
As Democrats continue to struggle with the details, including how to pay for it, party leaders in the House and Senate are aiming to vote next month on legislation.
In general, the legislation would remake the nation's $2.5 trillion health care system with a new requirement for most Americans to purchase health insurance, and government subsidies to help lower-income people do so. Insurers would face new restrictions against dropping coverage for sick people or denying coverage to people with pre-existing health conditions.
But Johanns, a former agriculture secretary in the Bush administration, said the plan would hurt a cross-section of people struggling in the economic downturn. Factory workers would be hit with higher premiums, while college graduates saddled with student loans would be forced to pay for health care they might not be able to afford, he said.
Johanns also claimed that the Democratic plan would eliminate entirely the ability for families to pay for medical expenses using tax-free dollars through flexible spending accounts.
The Senate bill under consideration would allow for flexible spending accounts, but cap them at $2,500 annually. Currently, there is no federal limit, although employers typically impose their own caps.
As for the proposed cuts to Medicare providers, Democrats say their plans would not affect core Medicare benefits and would strengthen the program overall by reducing fraud and abuse.
Johanns said Democrats' plans would end flexible spending accounts as they are currently offered and result in increased out-of-pocket costs.
Legislation in the Senate would cap at $2,500 annually the amount people are allowed to deduct from their salaries for deposit in these tax-free accounts. Currently, there is no federal cap, although employers typically impose their own caps. The proposed change raises money to help pay for Democratic health care legislation because it exposes more income to taxation.
___
Associated Press writer Erica Werner contributed to this report.
___
On the Net:
Weekly Republican address: http://www.youtube.com/user/gopweeklyaddress


There are 6 comments
I believe that the senators and house of representatives salaries are to pricey and should be deleted...
These are the jobs which needs to be outsource premanently...
and while i'm at it----when did it become illegal, unconstitutional, amoral, and unmentionable in polite society to suggest raising taxes on that top 1% of the chain?.....if only the top rate would go UP (that's right UP) to what it was under the republican jesus reagan, universal single-payer health care would be paid for ...with enough left over for medicare, medicaid, and soc sec
insurance mandate=criminalizing the inability to afford expensive health insurance......what a country
Interesting. Republicans under Bush had no difficulty giving tax breaks equaling 2.5 x that amount to the top 1% of the food chain, but have a problem getting health care to the other end.
So sad...
Okay, RepubliCANTs...what's your altenative?
Oh, that's right. My bad. You don't HAVE one. Except, as Rep. Grayson so adroitly pointed out, "die quickly."
Those pesky, pesky facts...
Yes, there's no doubt about it. The GOP will be quite content with another 20% increase in your insurance premiums, because, frankly, the insurance industry is still putting re-election cash in their pockets, and if any of them by some chance should be defeated in their next election, the insurance robbers will give them a job as a lobbyist..
Mandate to purchase health insurance minus competitive public option = cash cow for the insuance industry and the GOP.
Post a Comment
You are not logged in:
Log In | Register