House Votes To Restricts Abortion Access In Health Care Reform

Sunday November 8, 2009 12:52 p.m.

Lead Photo

A supporter holds a sign during a rally against the health care overhaul bill on Capitol Hill in Washington, Saturday, Nov. 7, 2009.(AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

WASHINGTON (AP) — A bipartisan House coalition voted Saturday to prohibit coverage of abortions in a new government-run health care plan that Democrats would establish to compete with private insurers.

The 240-194 vote on an amendment by Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., was a blow to liberals, who would have allowed the Obama administration and its successors to decide whether abortions would be covered by the government plan. Sixty-four Democrats joined 176 Republicans in favor of the prohibition.

Stupak's measure also would bar anyone getting federal health subsidies from purchasing private insurance polices that included abortion coverage.

"Let us stand together on principle — no public funding for abortions, no public funding for insurance policies that pay for abortions," Stupak urged fellow lawmakers before the vote.

The amendment would bar the new government insurance plan from covering abortions, except in cases of rape, incest, or where the life of the mother is in danger. The Democrats' original legislation would have allowed the government plan to cover abortions, if the Health and Human Services secretary decided it should.

The amendment also would prohibit people who receive new federal health subsidies from buying insurance plans that include abortion coverage.

The Democrats' original bill would have allowed people getting federal subsidies to pay for abortion coverage with their own money. Abortion opponents dismissed that as an accounting gimmick.

Abortion rights advocates called the measure the biggest setback to women's reproductive rights in decades. Anti-abortion Democrats forced House leaders to bring it up for a vote by threatening to oppose the underlying bill, and efforts to reach a compromise fell apart Friday night.

"Like it or not, this is a legal medical procedure and we should respect those who need to make this very personal decision," said Rep. Diana DeGette, D-Colo.

Some Republicans considered voting "present" in hopes that might unravel support for the underlying health care bill among anti-abortion Democrats, but only one did, Rep. John Shadegg, R-Ariz.

"If I felt that the (health overhaul) bill could be killed by not advancing the Stupak amendment then it seems it would be prudent to vote in such a way that wouldn't advance the bill, but it doesn't appear that that's a possibility," Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., said before the vote.

The National Right to Life Committee and the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops lobbied lawmakers in both parties on the abortion measure. The bishops said they would oppose the bill if it lacked a strict prohibition on any federal funding for abortions.

Stupak's language applies to policies sold in a federally regulated insurance exchange that would be set up in 2013. The overhaul bill envisions both private companies and the government offering policies in the exchange.

Under the Stupak amendment, people who do not receive federal insurance subsidies could buy private insurance plans in the exchange that include abortion coverage. People who receive federal subsidies could buy separate policies covering only abortions if they use only their own money to do it.

There are 3 comments

3.
moderator_beta


@ 2. WWWoDEMOCRATZoORG,
===========================================================

STOP Spamming the threads! You are violating our Terms of Service policy and your comments can and will be taken down.
===========================================================

Thank you so very much for your cooperation!
===========================================================

Here is a shortcut to the referenced link:
http://airamerica.com/terms/
===========================================================

2.
WWWoDEMOCRATZoORG

I suggest catholics who believe in choice for women conduct a tithing strike untl congress removes the Stupak amendment.

Also see http://WWW.DEMOCRATZ.ORG for other phone calls and petitions to take action for.

In case you cannot reach http://www.democratz.org you can use http://bit.ly/democratz or http://bit.ly/DEMOCRATZ

1.
jade5454

Next stop, back-alley coat-hanger abortions. Health insurance does pay for sepsis, shredded uteri and cervices, and all sorts of other infections and trashed organs, so we do have that as the silver lining.

I would like for this country to wake up and see reality. Accessiblity to clean, safe abortions is not an assault on anti-abortion ethics. It's an assault on women. You have your beliefs, I have mine but in the meantime please stay out of my uterus. It's none of your business what *choices* I make.

There will always be abortions. There have been abortions since the beginning of mankind and it's not going to stop because some very vocal people want to impress their beliefs upon the rest of the nation. Rich people will always be able to find an abortion provider and will have the money to pay for it. Refusing goverment funding for the (shrinking)middle class, for those of us severely affected by the current economy or those of us stuck in life-long poverty makes accessiblity impossible. It's another way to keep women in their place - barefoot, pregnant, and in the kitchen, so to speak.

To the House: you are a bunch of wussies. I realize you want to be re-elected. Is your job more important than the countless lives you just made harder? To the Senate: I can't wait to see the watered-down uber-wussie crap you come up with.

Post a Comment

You are not logged in:

Log In | Register

Commenting Tips: Please review before clicking "Submit" - There will be no preview.

blogroll - take a look at what we're checking out

Collapse/Expand Blogroll