Tough Road Ahead In Senate For House Health Care Bill

Sunday November 8, 2009 12:50 p.m.

Lead Photo

Speaker Nancy Pelosi, center, is joined by (L-R) Majority Whip James Clyburn, and Rep. George Miller, D-Calif. during a press conference at the U.S. Capitol, Saturday, Nov. 7, 2009 in Washington after the passage in the house of the health care reform bill. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Democratic-controlled House narrowly passed far-reaching health care legislation, handing President Barack Obama a hard-won victory on his chief domestic priority though the road ahead in the Senate promises to be rocky.

The 220-215 vote late Saturday cleared the way for the Senate to begin a long-delayed debate on the issue that has come to overshadow all others in Congress.

"The House bill is dead on arrival in the Senate," Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said Sunday. "It was a bill written by liberals for liberals." A Democratic colleague, Sen. Jack Reed of Rhode Island, predicted an overhaul would pass the Senate because "it's essential" to the country's economic success and people's quality of life. "It will take time," he added.

House Republicans were nearly unanimous in opposing the plan that would expand coverage to tens of millions of Americans and place tough new restrictions on the insurance industry.

A triumphant Speaker Nancy Pelosi compared the legislation to the passage of Social Security in 1935 and Medicare 30 years later.

Obama, who went to Capitol Hill on Saturday to lobby wavering Democrats, said in a statement after the vote that he looked forward to signing a bill by year's end.

Republicans detailed their objections across hours of debate on the 1,990-page, $1.2 trillion legislation.

"We are going to have a complete government takeover of our health care system faster than you can say, 'this is making me sick,'" said Rep. Candice Miller, R-Mich.

In the run-up to a final vote, conservatives from the two political parties joined forces to impose tough new restrictions on abortion coverage in insurance policies to be sold to many individuals and small groups.

The legislation would require most Americans to carry insurance and provide federal subsidies to those who otherwise could not afford it. Large companies would have to offer coverage to their employees. Both consumers and companies would be slapped with penalties if they defied the government's mandates.

Insurance industry practices such as denying coverage because of medical conditions would be banned, and insurers would no longer be able to charge higher premiums on the basis of gender or medical history. The industry would also lose its exemption from federal antitrust restrictions on price fixing and market allocation.

At its core, the measure would create a federally regulated marketplace where consumers could shop for coverage. In the bill's most controversial provision, the government would sell insurance, although the Congressional Budget Office forecasts that premiums for it would be more expensive than for policies sold by private companies.

Graham said he thinks the government option "will destroy private health care. Nobody in this country in the insurance business can compete with a government-sponsored plan, where the government writes the benefits and politicians will never raise the premiums."

Sen. Joe Lieberman, an independent from Connecticut, said that "if the public option plan is in there, as a matter of conscience, I will not allow this bill to come to a final vote because I believe the debt can break America and send us into a recession that's worse than the one we're fighting our way out of today."

There are 3 comments

3.
Wes

Health Care can get passed in the Senate through the reconciliation process. There you only need 50 Democrats to vote "Aye" and there are 57 Democrats who will vote "Aye" on a bill with a public option.

Lieberman, Snowe, Bauchus, and the bull dike looking senator named Lindsey and the rest of them are just not relevant. Stop perpetuation myths and tell people to call their senators and demand a reconciliation vote now.

Every day Republicans waste with their nonsense in the Senate gets more and more Americans killed. Republicans have already killed tens of thousands of Americans just this year alone with their delay tactics and theatrics. Enough is enough.

2.
pipefittergal

OOPS... either I missed it (probably) or AAR put it back up in another thread with a different photo.

[**shrugs**]

1.
pipefittergal

Oh, here it is, up-dated and scrubbed free of previous comment. This story was posted here this morning, but it disappeared for a few hrs.

This bill has a couple of good things in it, such as repeal of anti-trust exemption for insurers (though I have little faith in enforcement) and insurers can't deny coverage for a pre-existing condition, nor base rates on things like gender.

I don't like for one second that there will be those forced to buy insurance from a private carrier and if they can't afford it, the tax-payers will foot the bill to make up the difference. I MUCH PREFER a strong public option. IMO, this bill is a BOON to private insurers, and once again, the people end up with scraps.

Post a Comment

You are not logged in:

Log In | Register

Commenting Tips: Please review before clicking "Submit" - There will be no preview.

blogroll - take a look at what we're checking out

Collapse/Expand Blogroll